메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제47권 제3호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
23 - 42 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
When Philip Larkin died of cancer of the esophagus in 1985, the obituaries endowed him with near sainthood. His fame was great and his claims on immortality considerable. But a funny thing happened on his way up Parnassus. Thanks to two of Larkin’s literary executors, his reputation has been sinking in a critical storm whose rumblings continue to this moment. With the publication of the Selected Letters by Anthony Thwaite in 1992 and Andrew Motions’s biography in 1993, opinion changed sharply. Larkin had become a racist, a misogynist, foul-mouthed, neurotic, addicted to pornography, a fascist, a politically incorrect misanthropist who belittled even his closest friends. But the relationship between Larkin’s life and work is highly problematic and teasingly oblique. So, for a rightful access to the recent criticism against Larkin, we have to move away from a concern with Larkin as person to a more deep look at his poetry and at its major themes and techniques. In order to understand Larkin’s dichotomy between his social life and his writing life, we should return to the rhetorical strategies which make his poems simultaneously self-revealing and self-protective. He must be estimated and remembered on the basis of his work, not of the biographical details.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0