지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.8
- 수록면
- 1,169 - 1,182 (14page)
- DOI
- 10.35159/kjss.2019.08.28.4.1169
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study applies the three-phase evaluation theory to analyze the categorial differences in type of technical scores by stage of male table tennis players by country. To achieve the goals of the study of Korean, Chinese and Japanese National Men’s Table Tennis Players were examined. Four players from each national team were selected and competition data from the previous three years were analyzed. Twenty competitions per player and 80 competitions from each team were analyzed, equaling a total of 240 competitions. The results of the study are as follows.
First, an examination of the categorical differences in type of technical scores by stage of Korean, Chinese and Japanese male table tennis players by country using the three-phase evaluation theory suggests that among the first and third balls, the sidespin serve resulted in the greatest points for the first ball. For the third ball, the topspin technique resulted in the greatest points and the forehand drive technique led to more points than the backhand drive technique. The greatest number of points were conceded using the topspin from the forehand technique. Among the backhand techniques, the Korean and Chinese male table tennis teams possessed the best topspin and the Japanese male table tennis team possessed the best backhand defense.
Second, For the second and fourth balls, the forehand cut and the forehand drive techniques most commonly led to greater points for the second ball. Among the backhand techniques, the backhand drive and the backhand cut techniques were the most common. The greatest number of points were conceded by the Chinese male table tennis team when using the forehand drive technique and by the Korean and Japanese male table tennis teams when using the forehand cut technique. Among the backhand techniques, the backhand drive was the most common. Among the forehand and backhand techniques, the topspin resulted in more points and the defense technique resulted in the greatest number of point concessions for the fourth ball.
Third, After the fourth ball, the greatest number of points were awarded using the drive technique among the forehand and backhand techniques.
The greatest number of points were conceded using the forehand drive for the Chinese and Korean male table tennis players and using the defense technique for the Japanese male table tennis players. Among the backhand techniques, the defense technique was the most commonly used.
First, an examination of the categorical differences in type of technical scores by stage of Korean, Chinese and Japanese male table tennis players by country using the three-phase evaluation theory suggests that among the first and third balls, the sidespin serve resulted in the greatest points for the first ball. For the third ball, the topspin technique resulted in the greatest points and the forehand drive technique led to more points than the backhand drive technique. The greatest number of points were conceded using the topspin from the forehand technique. Among the backhand techniques, the Korean and Chinese male table tennis teams possessed the best topspin and the Japanese male table tennis team possessed the best backhand defense.
Second, For the second and fourth balls, the forehand cut and the forehand drive techniques most commonly led to greater points for the second ball. Among the backhand techniques, the backhand drive and the backhand cut techniques were the most common. The greatest number of points were conceded by the Chinese male table tennis team when using the forehand drive technique and by the Korean and Japanese male table tennis teams when using the forehand cut technique. Among the backhand techniques, the backhand drive was the most common. Among the forehand and backhand techniques, the topspin resulted in more points and the defense technique resulted in the greatest number of point concessions for the fourth ball.
Third, After the fourth ball, the greatest number of points were awarded using the drive technique among the forehand and backhand techniques.
The greatest number of points were conceded using the forehand drive for the Chinese and Korean male table tennis players and using the defense technique for the Japanese male table tennis players. Among the backhand techniques, the defense technique was the most commonly used.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국과 중국 국가대표 남자탁구선수의 경기내용 분석
한국스포츠학회
2015 .12
-
국가 간 남자 탁구대표선수의 단계별 득실점시스템이 시합승패에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2020 .10
-
훈련 경험 및 성별에 따른 테니스 선수의 라이프 스킬 비교
한국체육과학회지
2016 .04
-
휠체어 탁구 백핸드 드라이브 시 방향에 따른 인체분절의 운동학적 변인 비교 분석
코칭능력개발지
2025 .02
-
테니스 학생선수의 경기력 결정요인 탐색
한국체육과학회지
2025 .02
-
타격 중 시선 선행이 신체의 운동학적 변인에 미치는 영향
한국사회체육학회지
2016 .08
-
스쿼시 포핸드와 백핸드 드라이브 스윙 시 성별에 따른 운동역학적 비교 분석: 사례 연구
한국체육과학회지
2022 .08
-
삼단평가이론을 적용한 한·중 남자 국가대표 탁구선수의 기술 사용효율성과 시합성과 분석
한국체육측정평가학회지
2018 .06
-
한국 탁구선수 육성체계 현황 및 개선방안
한국체육정책학회지
2016 .02
-
Using Counseling to Improve the Self-confidence of a Young Competitive Female Tennis Player : A Case Study
International Journal of Coaching Science
2018 .07
-
테니스선수 자기효능감이 인지된 경기력과 운동수행능력에 미치는 영향
한국사회체육학회지
2020 .07
-
테니스 선수의 경력, 경기수준 및 성격유형에 따른 선호하는 지도자의 행동유형 분석
한국체육과학회지
2015 .10
-
테니스 발리 기술의 평가도구 개발
코칭능력개발지
2018 .03
-
삼단평가이론을 적용한 한국⋅중국⋅독일 남자 탁구 국가대표 선수의 기술사용 효율성 및 시합 성과 분석
한국스포츠학회
2019 .01
-
초등학생 배드민턴 선수의 백핸드 드롭 동작 개선을 위한운동학적 및 상지의 근활동 분석
한국초등체육학회지
2016 .01
-
대학 교양체육 테니스에서 양손 백핸드 그라운드스트로크 평가도구 개발
코칭능력개발지
2015 .12
-
테니스협회 통합에 따른 테니스대회 통합방안
한국체육정책학회지
2019 .02
-
정서조절을 매개로 한 탁구선수의 열정과 탈진에 관한 연구
한국체육과학회지
2017 .08
-
코어 안정화 운동이 테니스 동호인의 균형능력 및 포핸드 스토로크 기능에 미치는 영향
한국사회체육학회지
2017 .02
-
휠체어 테니스 선수들의 수행수준에 따른 수행전략과 경쟁불안의 관계
한국체육과학회지
2015 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0