메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박정은 (경희대학교) 장미정 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 語文學 第144輯
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
331 - 359 (29page)
DOI
10.37967/emh.2019.06.144.331

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examines how the method used to provide answer options for multiple choice questions in listening and reading tests of the Korean language affects test results by focusing on the questions that involve understanding specific information. In this study, 160 foreign undergraduate students took Korean listening and reading tests. For the evaluation, ten multiple choice questions that involved understanding specific information were selected from each of the listening and reading examinations of the intermediate-level Test of Proficiency in Korean. The answer options were provided in two different ways: the first was according to the length of each sentence, and the second was according to the order in which information was provided. The results showed that the listening test was more strongly impacted than the reading test by the composition of the answer options. In the case of the listening test, in particular, results were better when the answer options were listed in the same order as the information was provided in the passage than when listing the options according to the length of each sentence. Advanced learners’ results did not vary for the reading test, regardless of the way the multiple answer options were provided. However, the listening test showed different results depending on how the answer options were listed. Intermediate learners showed different test results depending on the listing method of the answer options in both listening and reading tests, but the difference was more prominent in the former. Based on the results above, this study suggests that listing the multiple answer options according to the order in which the information was provided to the participant in the passage is more effective for measuring the learners’ own ability to understand Korean.

목차

1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 연구 방법
4. 연구 결과
5. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-810-000858723