지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제112호
- 발행연도
- 2019.6
- 수록면
- 135 - 170 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2019.06.112.135
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is Baekje’s diplomatic negotiations with China in the 3rd and 4th centuries, with a local post named “Dong’ih Gyowi.” There are not that many records of this period and it is difficult to determine what really happened in this period, but it was an important period for Baekje nonetheless, in terms of its growth as an Ancient kingdom. Considering such significance of this period better understanding of it should be pursued, and the nature of diplomatic relationships that Baekje had with other countries may be a good place to start.
For Chinese dynasties, the ‘peripheral units(“Byeon’gun”)’ were put in charge of dealings with ‘barbaric neighbors,’ but later they were replaced by the “Gyowi” figures. These ‘Gyowi’ figures were initially in charge of dealing with respective individual races, but during the Western Jin(‘Seojin’) era, the post itself was redesigned to be put in charge of monitoring ‘all’ races (in designated quadrants), and among the “Gyowi posts for Barbaric races on all Four sides(四夷名),” the Gyowi figure which was in charge of the Dong’ih area was named the “Dong’ih Gyowi.” Junior political entities on the Korean peninsula –which included Baekje- responded to such policy of the Chinese dynasties by changing their diplomatic channels from the peripheral Byeon’gun units to Gyowi figures. Yet the Dong’ih Gyowi office was located in a much farther position, and in order to pay tributes to Dong’ih Gyowi, Baekje had to absorb the population of some peripheral units, which had been its previous counterpart in diplomatic dialogues.
The Dong’ih Gyowi was redesigned to be in charge of barbaric races in general, and to such races the Dong’ih Gyowi post maintained such status even after the fall of Seojin. The Moyong Seonbi in particular served the task of Dong’ih Gyowi, as a subordinate of Eastern Jin(‘Dongjin’) and under its orders. Even after it began to call itself an empire in 345, the Dong’ih Gyowi post was still filled under the name of controling barbaric races. Baekje continued to deal with them –as Former Yeon(‘Jeon’yeon’) was part of Dongjin’s rule- in order to monitor Goguryeo.
When Jeon’yeon fell in 370, Baekje initiated direct contacts with Dongjin. Baekje, since the time it was a mere small political entity, had maintained diplomatic ties with the Han race(漢族), and had also been influenced by all the Han individuals who manned the Nakrang and Daebang Commandery units which had also occupied a big part in Baekje people’s external dealings. With all those experiences under its belt, Baekje commenced full-scale diplomatic negotiations with the Southern dynasties.
For Chinese dynasties, the ‘peripheral units(“Byeon’gun”)’ were put in charge of dealings with ‘barbaric neighbors,’ but later they were replaced by the “Gyowi” figures. These ‘Gyowi’ figures were initially in charge of dealing with respective individual races, but during the Western Jin(‘Seojin’) era, the post itself was redesigned to be put in charge of monitoring ‘all’ races (in designated quadrants), and among the “Gyowi posts for Barbaric races on all Four sides(四夷名),” the Gyowi figure which was in charge of the Dong’ih area was named the “Dong’ih Gyowi.” Junior political entities on the Korean peninsula –which included Baekje- responded to such policy of the Chinese dynasties by changing their diplomatic channels from the peripheral Byeon’gun units to Gyowi figures. Yet the Dong’ih Gyowi office was located in a much farther position, and in order to pay tributes to Dong’ih Gyowi, Baekje had to absorb the population of some peripheral units, which had been its previous counterpart in diplomatic dialogues.
The Dong’ih Gyowi was redesigned to be in charge of barbaric races in general, and to such races the Dong’ih Gyowi post maintained such status even after the fall of Seojin. The Moyong Seonbi in particular served the task of Dong’ih Gyowi, as a subordinate of Eastern Jin(‘Dongjin’) and under its orders. Even after it began to call itself an empire in 345, the Dong’ih Gyowi post was still filled under the name of controling barbaric races. Baekje continued to deal with them –as Former Yeon(‘Jeon’yeon’) was part of Dongjin’s rule- in order to monitor Goguryeo.
When Jeon’yeon fell in 370, Baekje initiated direct contacts with Dongjin. Baekje, since the time it was a mere small political entity, had maintained diplomatic ties with the Han race(漢族), and had also been influenced by all the Han individuals who manned the Nakrang and Daebang Commandery units which had also occupied a big part in Baekje people’s external dealings. With all those experiences under its belt, Baekje commenced full-scale diplomatic negotiations with the Southern dynasties.
목차
머리말
1. 서진(西晋) 동이교위(東夷校尉)를 통한 교섭의 개시
2. 동이교위(東夷校尉) 변화상과 교섭의 지속
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (63)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
中西部地域 原三國~漢城期 百濟 시루의 地域特性 硏究
백제연구
2017 .01
-
일본 속 백제 유물의 범위와 의미
백제문화
2015 .08
-
통일에서 분열로 : 후백제의 성립 배경과 관련하여
신라사학보
2018 .04
-
GIS를 활용한 한성기 백제 관방체계 연구
고조선단군학
2022 .12
-
한성시기 백제의 宋･北魏와의 외교 배경과 그 양상
선사와 고대
2017 .01
-
고대 동아시아의 해양기술을 통해 바라본 백제 한성기 항해술과 조선술
해양문화재
2022 .06
-
640년대 전반 ‘麗濟連和’의 실상과 唐의 백제 인식
사학연구
2021 .03
-
2018년 경기·호서지역 백제 고고학 연구 성과와 과제
백제학보
2019 .01
-
포스터를 통해 바라본 백제문화제 -최근 10여 년을 중심으로-
人文科學硏究
2023 .02
-
백제 의복 고유양식의 성립과 변화
한국고대사연구
2015 .03
-
백제 국제관계사 연구동향과 시기구분 시론
백제학보
2015 .01
-
4~5세기 동아시아 국제정세와 백제의 외교정책
백제문화
2017 .02
-
백제의 ‘전북지역’ 진출 과정과 추이 변화
전북사학
2020 .01
-
한성기 백제토기 하한에 대한 비판적 검토
역사학보
2024 .12
-
중국 학계의 백제사 연구 동향
동북아역사논총
2018 .06
-
백제 외교문서의 종류와 형식 －5세기 남북조와의 관계를 중심으로－
한국사학보
2022 .11
-
백제 서남부지역 최근 고고학적 조사 현황과 과제
백제연구
2023 .02
-
후백제의 정체성 변화에 따른 외교 전략
전북사학
2024 .07
-
백제부여출자설의 역사적 배경과 의의
한국고대사연구
2023 .09
-
백제의 고창·영광지역 지배 과정과 그 추이
백제학보
2023 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-911-000857860