메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이미옥 (명지대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제59집
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
5 - 20 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to compare Go Jeong-hui who went through the period of turbulence in the 80’s with a series of pro-democracy movements in Korea and Sū Tǐng who lived through the 80’s in China that was in the center of enormous social as well as economic transformation within the flow of new culture and ideology after the cultural revolution of major disturbance lasting for 10 years and consider how women’s writing was realized aesthetically as participation in the era when resistance against suppression took place explosively in the two areas equipped with different cultures and systems as capitalism and socialism. Go Jeong-hui and Sū Tǐng were both representative women oriented to the same path in the aspects of resisting against male authority and refusing male-dominated literary tradition; however, in the aspects of expression, they are characterized very differently. Go Jeong-hui established the identity of feminist poetry by dismantling poetic grammar that trapped the writers and disclosing the suppressive mechanism of poetic writing through explicit utterances while Sū Tǐng expressed what she wanted to say through misty poetry correspondingly to the circumstances in China.
Go Jeong-hui reported physical suppression, substantial pain, and hardships in life that women had to go through in men-oriented society through female narrators either directly or indirectly whereas Sū Tǐng chose not to report such aspects of men directly but to negate the image of traditional women relying on and adapting to men and stress the importance of women having to become independent and subjective mainly. Also, in reporting the truth of external world symbolizing male authority, Go Jeong-hui tried to resist that through straight-forward expressions while Sū Tǐng suggested women them to look back on themselves first rather than to confront it directly through the use of exquisite analogy or metaphor. Lastly, about the possibility of overcoming it, Go Jeong-hui developed the possibility of building a new world through mothers’ sacrifice and sisterhood whereas Sū Tǐng brought macroscopic discourse as comparing mothers to the mother nation solely.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 고정희의 평범한 여성상과 수팅의 신화적 여성상
Ⅲ. 고정희의 외부확장과 수팅의 내부지향(비판대상의 부재)
Ⅳ. 고정희의 ‘자매애’와 수팅의 ‘조국애’
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
논문초록

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0