메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
권영진 (한국예술종합학교)
저널정보
한국근현대미술사학회 한국근현대미술사학 한국근현대미술사학 제35집
발행연도
2018.7
수록면
147 - 174 (28page)
DOI
10.46834/jkmcah.2018.07.35.147

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to analyze the entries and prize-winning art works of the National Exhibition, and determine the contributions and limitations brought on by the 30-year history of the exhibition on the formation of Korea’s modern art, and what role it played in the development of the Koreans’ perception on enjoyment of art and modern art. A closer look into the entries and award-winning works at the exhibition between 1949 and 1981 reveals that there existed a predominant style of painting of realistic figurative art, which was also called academism, yet on the other hand, a number of half-abstraction and abstract works were forming a clear linage of some sort from the early on. Statistics and studies on the materials of work books of the exhibition have pointed to the conclusion that the abstract style of paintings by non-mainstream artists who challenged a conservative National Exhibition was forming a somewhat similar stream within the exhibition. It seems inappropriate to explain the interior border of the National Exhibition with conflicting ideas such as conservative and avantgarde; mainstream and non-mainstream; and figurative and abstract style. The abstractionism that challenged the realistic style of painting in the National Exhibition was accepted in the exhibition to form academism, and the National Exhibition that accepted the challenge of the unconventional had developed to encompass two different streams at the same time.
The post-war Korean National Exhibition, therefore, was not a failed institution, but rather it embraced both conservative academism and avant-garde modernism at the same time, thereby developing an academism peculiar to the reality in Korea. Furthermore, it accorded with the Korean government’s objective to create a nationwide venue for art participated by all artists, as well as responded in an appropriate manner to the needs of the artists who attempt to acquire authority and honor through the National Exhibition, thus fulfilled its mission.

목차

Ⅰ. 국전과 한국미술의 아카데미즘
Ⅱ. 국전 30년의 제도 변천
Ⅲ. 국전 내 추상미술의 발전 경로
Ⅳ. 두 개의 국전, 두 개의 아카데미즘
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-605-000327020