메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
권태원 (한양대학교) 양진관 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제27권 제5호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2018.10
수록면
1,477 - 1,486 (10page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2018.10.27.5.1477

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analysis whatever Borg’s RPE(Rate of Perceived Exertion) always could apply regardless to subject’s characteristics in progressive exercise intensity load. That is, This study is to verify whether Borg’s RPE can apply regardless of age group (from 20s to 40s).
The subjects for this experiment were each of 20s, 30s, and 40s group in each of 10 persons who involved in female and male group, respectably. Borg’s 7,9,11,13,15,17,19 out of 15 steps were arranged by adding 17, 19 levels which is upper level to the load that described mainly for the exercise prescription of the Korean adults.
The results are as follows:
1. In male, there is no significant difference in the total group of 20s, 30s, 40s in each steps(p>.05). Also, in the test of post-hoc of the each age group is no significant difference (p>.05) except for the between 30s and 40s(p<05).
2. In female, there is significant difference in the total group of 20s,30s ,and 40s in 9, 11 step levels(p<.001). the group of the 20s is higher than 30s,40s in the step levels statistically. Also, in the test of the post-hoc of the each age group show significant different between 20s and 30s in 9 step level. And show significant different between 20s and 40 in the 9 step level(p<.001) and 11 step level (p<.05), 13 step level (p<.05), and 15, 19 step levels(p<.05). in the post-hoc test, 20s shows higher than 30sand 40s, statistically, (p<.001).
In conclusion, the table of Borg’s RPE needs to adjust according to the age group 20s, 30s, 40s, male and female, respectably. that shows differently with the Borg’s table.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-692-000058545