메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역상무학회 무역상무연구 무역상무연구 제42권
발행연도
2009.5
수록면
275 - 305 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Marine insurance contracts, which intended to provide indemnity againstmarine risks upon the payment of price, known as a premium, originatedin Northern Italy in the late 12th and early 13th centuries. The law andpractice were later introduced into England through the Continent. It is,therefore, quite exact that English and European marine insurance lawhave common roots. Nevertheless, significant divergences between Englishand European insurance systems occurred since the late 17th century,mainly due to different approaches adopted by English courts.The rule of warranty in English marine insurance was developed andclarified in the second part of the 18th century by Lord Mansfield, wholaid the foundations of the modern English law of marine insurance, anddeveloped different approaches, especially in the field of warranty inmarine insurance law. Since the age of Lord Mansfield, English marineinsurance law has a unique rule on warranty. This article is, therefore,designed to analyse the overall rule of the rule of warranty in Englishmarine insurance law. The result of analysis are as following.First, warranties are incorporated to serve a very significant function inthe law of insurance, that is, confining or determining the scope of thecover agreed by the insurer. From the insurer's point of view, such thefunction of warranties is crucial, because his liability, agreed on thecontract of insurance, largely depend on in, and the warranties,incorporated in the contract play an essential role in assessing the risk. Ifthe warranty is breached, the risk initially agreed is alteredand that servesthe reason why the insurer is allowed to discharge automatically furtherliability from the date of breach.Secondly, the term 'warranty' is used to describe a term of the contractin general and insurance contract law, but the breach of which affordsdifferent remedies between general contract law and insurance contractlaw.Thirdly, a express warranty may be in any form of words from whichthe intention to warrant is to be inferred. An express warranty must beincluded in, or written upon, the policy, or must be contained in somedocument incorporated by reference into the policy. It does not matterhow this is done.Fourthly, a warranty is a condition precedent to the insurer's liability onthe contract, and, therefore, once broken, the insurer automatically ceasesto be liable. If the breach pre-dates the attachment of risk, the insurerwill never put on risk, whereas if the breach occurs after inception ofrisk, the insurer remains liable for any losses within the scope of thepolicy, but has no liability for any subsequent losses.Finally, the requirements on the warranty must be determined inaccording to the rule of strict construction. As results, it is irrelevant: thereason that a certain warranty is introduced into the contract, whether thewarranty is material to the insurer's decision to accept the contract,whether or not the warranty is irrelevant to the risk or a loss, the extentof compliance, that is, whether the requirements on the warranty iscomplied exactly or substantially, the unreasonableness or hardship of therule of strict construction, and whether a breach of warranty has beenremedied, and the warranty complied with, before loss.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-320-000232755