지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 1 - 132 (132page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As environmental issues become complex and the dependence among socio-economic activities increases, the importance of cooperative system through participation of interested parties is emphasized. Because conflicts regarding resource recirculation take a variety of forms from installation of waste management facility to conflicts around living environment, development of and active participation in the governance of resource recirculation is an important tool for resolution. This study analyzes infrastructure for revitalization of resource recirculation in Gyeonggi province and proposes plans for revitalization of resource recirculation in Gyeonggi province by analyzing recognition of residents and treatment facility personnel.
First, “Basic Ordinance for Resource Recirculation in Gyeonggi Province” needs to be enacted. It is necessary to pass Basic Ordinance for Resource Recirculation that contains the vision and basic principle about resource recirculation society in Gyeonggi Province, role and responsibility of each entity, resource recirculation policy committee, construction of infrastructure for resource recirculation, expansion of resident participation, and partnership between civil and governmental entities.
Second, guidelines for local governments and regulations for supporting “Resource Recirculation Meeting (tentative)” are necessary. Guidelines for basic ordinance on resource recirculation in local governments need to set in place, and regulations for supporting “Resource Recirculation Meeting (tentative)” that promotes opinion-hearing for residents and joint investigation and evaluation into waste management need to be enacted. In order to resolve conflicts regarding the location of waste treatment facility and waste treatment, a framework for discussion where Resource Recirculation Meeting (tentative) composed of resident representatives and field experts takes charge in resolving points of conflicts in the process of location setting, construction and operation needs to be prepared.
Third, the base function of resource recirculation governance in Gyeonggi Province needs to be strengthened and a network of resource recirculation villages needs to be constructed. As there is a recent increase in the number of civil complaints and conflicts regarding new facilities such as SRF facility, automated vacuum waste collection facility, and food waste RFID facility, sharing of recognition on the operation of the facilities and preparation of a system for dialogue are considered important factors. In order to strengthen the base function of resource recirculation governance, support and promotion for programs for constructing partnerships with industrial counterparts with metropolitan-level upcycle center, green purchase center and resource recirculation-related facility need to be made, and the functions and roles as a hub for resource recirculation governance such as education, promotion and personnel training need to be expanded.
Fourth, plans for constructing and supporting the governance platform for resource recirculation at the metropolitan and local government levels need to in place. By utilizing resource recirculation governance regarding waste treatment facility operated in local areas, environmental information about management of treatment facility needs to be disclosed and evaluations for both environmental and health effects need to be conducted. Programs for operating waste treatment facility in local governments and activities of resident support committee need to be evaluated. In order to evaluate the possible expansion of governance for the expansion of culture about resource recirculation, pilot programs need to be conducted and expanded to other levels of government after performance evaluation.
First, “Basic Ordinance for Resource Recirculation in Gyeonggi Province” needs to be enacted. It is necessary to pass Basic Ordinance for Resource Recirculation that contains the vision and basic principle about resource recirculation society in Gyeonggi Province, role and responsibility of each entity, resource recirculation policy committee, construction of infrastructure for resource recirculation, expansion of resident participation, and partnership between civil and governmental entities.
Second, guidelines for local governments and regulations for supporting “Resource Recirculation Meeting (tentative)” are necessary. Guidelines for basic ordinance on resource recirculation in local governments need to set in place, and regulations for supporting “Resource Recirculation Meeting (tentative)” that promotes opinion-hearing for residents and joint investigation and evaluation into waste management need to be enacted. In order to resolve conflicts regarding the location of waste treatment facility and waste treatment, a framework for discussion where Resource Recirculation Meeting (tentative) composed of resident representatives and field experts takes charge in resolving points of conflicts in the process of location setting, construction and operation needs to be prepared.
Third, the base function of resource recirculation governance in Gyeonggi Province needs to be strengthened and a network of resource recirculation villages needs to be constructed. As there is a recent increase in the number of civil complaints and conflicts regarding new facilities such as SRF facility, automated vacuum waste collection facility, and food waste RFID facility, sharing of recognition on the operation of the facilities and preparation of a system for dialogue are considered important factors. In order to strengthen the base function of resource recirculation governance, support and promotion for programs for constructing partnerships with industrial counterparts with metropolitan-level upcycle center, green purchase center and resource recirculation-related facility need to be made, and the functions and roles as a hub for resource recirculation governance such as education, promotion and personnel training need to be expanded.
Fourth, plans for constructing and supporting the governance platform for resource recirculation at the metropolitan and local government levels need to in place. By utilizing resource recirculation governance regarding waste treatment facility operated in local areas, environmental information about management of treatment facility needs to be disclosed and evaluations for both environmental and health effects need to be conducted. Programs for operating waste treatment facility in local governments and activities of resident support committee need to be evaluated. In order to evaluate the possible expansion of governance for the expansion of culture about resource recirculation, pilot programs need to be conducted and expanded to other levels of government after performance evaluation.
목차
[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구배경 및 목적
2. 연구범위 및 방법
[제2장 자원순환 거버넌스 동향]
1. 자원순환 거버넌스의 이해
2. 자원순환 거버넌스 관련 법·제도
3. 경기도 자원순환 정책의 주민참여 인프라
[제3장 국내·외 사례]
1. 국내사례
2. 국외사례
[제4장 자원순환 거버넌스 운영 활성화 방안]
1. 자원순환 거버넌스 관련 인식 조사
2. 자원순환 거버넌스 운영 활성화 방안
[제5장 결론 및 정책제언]
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Environmental Governance Practices of Local Government Units on Waste Policy Implementation
산경연구논집
2021 .01
-
경기도 자원순환문화 조성사업 추진방안
정책연구
2019 .08
-
교정보호시설의 입지갈등과 대응방안 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2018 .12
-
2021년 청년정책 거버넌스의 단계와 성격: 경기도 기초자치단체 실태 분석을 통하여
현대정치연구
2021 .12
-
서울시 민관협치 활성화 기본계획 수립 연구
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2017 .10
-
남양주시 지역사회 민관 복지관련기관 네트워크의 구조적 특성과 거버넌스 유형
사회보장연구
2016 .01
-
공공 거버넌스의 유형: 모델링을 위한 메타분석을 중심으로
국정관리연구
2018 .01
-
경기도 생활계 유해폐기물 관리방안
정책연구
2020 .09
-
서울시 폐기물관리체계 A에서 Z까지
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .04
-
대학 시설경영관리 능률향상을 위한 FM 항목분석
한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회지
2018 .01
-
그린케어(Green Care) 도입을 위한 시설과 프로그램 유형분류 및 중요도 분석
농촌계획
2019 .01
-
데이터 거버넌스 수준평가 모델 개발의 제안
한국경영과학회지
2017 .02
-
경기환경공단 설립을 위한 사전 연구
정책연구
2018 .07
-
Data Governance 정량평가 모델 개발방법의 제안
한국경영과학회지
2017 .02
-
경기도 사업장 미세먼지 배출시설 인허가 제도 개선방안 연구
정책연구
2021 .03
-
농촌지역 공동시설 저활용 원인에 대한 이해관계자별 인식비교 연구
농촌계획
2023 .02
-
글로벌 폐기물 거버넌스와 중국의 환경외교 ― 국제정치적 갈등과 상호협력의 역학
중국학논총
2024 .03
-
광주시 공공시설(문화 및 체육)의 효율적 관리운영 방안 연구
정책연구
2022 .11
-
경기도 도시계획을 위한 기초조사정보체계 구축방안
정책연구
2021 .11
-
한국의 의료 클러스터에서 거버넌스 영향에 관한 실증연구
무역연구
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-309-003403917