지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제108호
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 209 - 243 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.06.108.209
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is why the global meaning of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement was never fully evaluated nor appropriately appreciated, and then was stuck in such status for such a long time. It is indeed an odd thing, considering the fact that this movement was arguably the first event ever to occur in Asia after the first World war ended, as a violence-free resistance against oppression, and as a struggle for a small and weak country to liberate itself from colonial occupation.
Some politicians and intellectuals who took notice of such nature began to argue that this Korean Movement actually paved the way for other similar movements in China and India, and virtually led Asian people’s struggle for independence. Some members of the Korean academic circle even suggested that the Korean March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement had significant influence upon the May 4<SUP>th</SUP> movement in China. These are all arguments and suggestions that had never been fully verified or proven (possibly with the exception of the aforementioned March 1<SUP>st</SUP>-May 4<SUP>th</SUP> connection). Nevertheless, the Korean press always emphasized March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement’s “historical meaning,” in terms of its supposed influence upon other weak and small countries’ similar efforts around the world.
Meanwhile, senior Korean scholars such as Shin Yong-ha and Yi Hyeon-hi began to write about the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement’s meaning ‘in world history’ through their professional works. And beginning with the 1974 State-produced High school National history textbooks, the Korean government also dictated that the meaning of March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement in terms of ‘global history’ should be described in all National(Korean) history textbooks. All these efforts ironically forced the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement to be paralyzed, in a status of ‘past history,’ burdened with a responsibility to perform its role as a ‘global event.’ Forced upon the legacy of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement was a nature which was never fully discussed or verified by academic circles.
Some politicians and intellectuals who took notice of such nature began to argue that this Korean Movement actually paved the way for other similar movements in China and India, and virtually led Asian people’s struggle for independence. Some members of the Korean academic circle even suggested that the Korean March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement had significant influence upon the May 4<SUP>th</SUP> movement in China. These are all arguments and suggestions that had never been fully verified or proven (possibly with the exception of the aforementioned March 1<SUP>st</SUP>-May 4<SUP>th</SUP> connection). Nevertheless, the Korean press always emphasized March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement’s “historical meaning,” in terms of its supposed influence upon other weak and small countries’ similar efforts around the world.
Meanwhile, senior Korean scholars such as Shin Yong-ha and Yi Hyeon-hi began to write about the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement’s meaning ‘in world history’ through their professional works. And beginning with the 1974 State-produced High school National history textbooks, the Korean government also dictated that the meaning of March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement in terms of ‘global history’ should be described in all National(Korean) history textbooks. All these efforts ironically forced the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement to be paralyzed, in a status of ‘past history,’ burdened with a responsibility to perform its role as a ‘global event.’ Forced upon the legacy of the March 1<SUP>st</SUP> movement was a nature which was never fully discussed or verified by academic circles.
목차
머리말
1. 세계사적 관점의 3.1운동 인식의 상반된 형성
2. ‘3.1운동의 세계사적 의의’의 공식화와 학문적 정립 시도
3. ‘3.1운동의 세계사적 의의’의 ‘미세한’ 균열
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Solidarity of the Oppressed in a Globalizing World
신학논단
2017 .12
-
3 · 1운동사 연구의 최근 동향과 방향성
역사와현실
2018 .12
-
영어와 한국어의 공범주 현상 비교 분석
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
-
7차 교육과정 이후 고등학교 <한국 근･현대사>･<한국사> 교과서의 1920년대 여성운동에 대한 서술 추이 연구
史叢(사총)
2024 .09
-
한국종교 사회운동의 패러다임 변화연구 : 불교와 개신교의 사회운동 전개과정을 중심으로
원불교사상과종교문화
2015 .12
-
HISTORY TEACHER’S REVIEW: WHAT DOES THE MARCH 1ST INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT OF 1919 MEAN TO US?
Public History & Museum
2019 .12
-
신불교사회운동으로서 깨달음의 사회화 운동
불교학보
2022 .07
-
영어와 한국어의 이동현상에 대한 연구
영어영문학
2018 .08
-
한국기독교역사연구소 사회운동 연구 동향과 과제
한국기독교와 역사
2023 .03
-
세기전환기 반자본주의 운동과 신 사회운동의 딜레마 -탈 물질주의적 가치관과 문화주의 이론의 한계-
서양사론
2017 .09
-
일제강점기 盧明愚의 민족운동과 사회운동
대구사학
2021 .01
-
1920~30년대 전북의 독립운동과 3.1운동 세대
전북사학
2019 .01
-
대만 사회운동에 관한 연구 - 2014년 해바라기운동을 중심으로
중국학논총
2015 .01
-
4월혁명기 대구지역 대학 학생운동의 양상과 성격
대구사학
2020 .01
-
When can Topics be Questioned?
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
1980년대 교지의 문예담론과 실천 연구
우리어문연구
2021 .09
-
독일 68운동의 비판과 반(反)비판 -폭력문제를 중심으로-
서양사론
2018 .01
-
미투(me too)운동의 나아갈 길과 위드유(with you)운동의 선구자들
한국여성신학
2018 .06
-
1980년대 문학에서 여성운동과 민중운동의 접점 : 고정희 시를 읽기 위한 시론(試論)
우리말글
2016 .12
-
주제화·wh-이동과 어순섞기 현상에서의 비대칭성
신영어영문학
2017 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-003164679