지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제108호
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 91 - 140 (50page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.06.108.91
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article are characteristics displayed by the Leftist branch (within the National Movement front), in its pursuit of a ‘Democratic Republic.’ The objective of such examination is to have a look at what kind of philosophical stance the Korean Provisional Government maintained at the time.
At this juncture, the Korean notion of a Democratic Republic portrayed a particular dynamic, in which Democracy was coupled with the Republic, while a Republic would incorporate the virtue of Equality, with Equality itself reflected in the realization of Democracy. Formed in such vision, it did not pursue either Capitalism or Socialism, and what was firmly at the center was the Korean nation (race). One could call it a ‘Non-Capitalist’ pursuit, which also aspired to bring equalization to all areas of life, including politics, economy and education. In that sense, the Korean notion of a Democratic Republic could also be called a Nationalist approach to Equality, or in some sense even Socialist Nationalism.
This Korean notion of a Democratic Republic later grew more detailed, as the trend of emphasizing the people’s role began to spread, and a sense of equality was strengthened as well. After the efforts to organize the ‘Unified [Single] Nation Party’ failed, however, clashes intensified between the Leftists and Rightists. The Nationalist Leftists’ vision of a Democratic Republic continued to take shape, and eventually differentiated itself from the Socialist vision of the same concept. The emergence of the Korean Liberation party (1930) in Shanghai can be cited as a result.
There was also a power struggle inside the [National Movement front’s] Leftist branch, but it was not because they differed in opinions over their vision of a Democratic Republic. They all pursued democracy, republic and equality, with the Korean race as a linchpin. The situation of the time also facilitated that trend a little, as the World war of the time sort of had the Korean society go in either pro-Japan or anti-Japan directions. Meanwhile, the Nationalist Leftists were able to meet with the Socialist movement as well on various issues, such as direct and popular elections, as those issues could have contributed to political equality that was after all one of the objectives of a democratic republic.
At this juncture, the Korean notion of a Democratic Republic portrayed a particular dynamic, in which Democracy was coupled with the Republic, while a Republic would incorporate the virtue of Equality, with Equality itself reflected in the realization of Democracy. Formed in such vision, it did not pursue either Capitalism or Socialism, and what was firmly at the center was the Korean nation (race). One could call it a ‘Non-Capitalist’ pursuit, which also aspired to bring equalization to all areas of life, including politics, economy and education. In that sense, the Korean notion of a Democratic Republic could also be called a Nationalist approach to Equality, or in some sense even Socialist Nationalism.
This Korean notion of a Democratic Republic later grew more detailed, as the trend of emphasizing the people’s role began to spread, and a sense of equality was strengthened as well. After the efforts to organize the ‘Unified [Single] Nation Party’ failed, however, clashes intensified between the Leftists and Rightists. The Nationalist Leftists’ vision of a Democratic Republic continued to take shape, and eventually differentiated itself from the Socialist vision of the same concept. The emergence of the Korean Liberation party (1930) in Shanghai can be cited as a result.
There was also a power struggle inside the [National Movement front’s] Leftist branch, but it was not because they differed in opinions over their vision of a Democratic Republic. They all pursued democracy, republic and equality, with the Korean race as a linchpin. The situation of the time also facilitated that trend a little, as the World war of the time sort of had the Korean society go in either pro-Japan or anti-Japan directions. Meanwhile, the Nationalist Leftists were able to meet with the Socialist movement as well on various issues, such as direct and popular elections, as those issues could have contributed to political equality that was after all one of the objectives of a democratic republic.
목차
머리말
1. 임시정부의 「임시헌장」과 「정강」, ‘민주공화제’론의 명문화
2. 1920년대 민중론의 확산과 ‘민주공화제’론의 분화
3. 비자본주의를 지향하는 논리체계 수립
4. 세계대전과 ‘민족주의운동 좌파’의 접점 찾기
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
상해 대한민국임시정부 수립 일백주년 기념 : 상해 대한민국임시정부의「임시헌장」(1919)과 장로교회 「헌법」(1907-1922)의 공통성 연구 : 민주공화제의 정착에 관한 역사적 고찰을 중심으로
장신논단
2019 .03
-
3・1운동 이전 민주공화제의 수용과 확산
韓國史學史學報
2018 .01
-
一波 嚴恒燮의 독립운동과 대한민국 임시정부 활동
한국독립운동사연구
2021 .08
-
文化大革命과 ‘血統論’
중국사연구
2018 .01
-
68운동의 정신, 자본주의 비판에서 자본주의 정당화로 -볼탕스키와 시아펠로의 ‘새로운 자본주의 정신’을 중심으로-
서양사론
2018 .01
-
자본주의 다양성과 유럽 민주적 자본주의의 위기: 1986년 이후
서양사연구
2015 .01
-
대안 패러다임의 전망 －인지자본주의적 포획에 맞서는 공통장 운동과 다중의 절대민주주의적 섭정－
공동체문화와 민속 연구
2022 .09
-
윌슨의 민족자결주의가 대한민국 임시헌장에 미친 영향:기독교적 민주주의 국가 건설
성경과 신학
2019 .01
-
중일전쟁기 대한민국 임시정부에 대한 중화민국 국민정부의 지원
동양학
2016 .01
-
유교자본주의라는 용어에 대한 비판적 고찰
퇴계학논집
2015 .01
-
대한민국 임시정부의 ‘독립전쟁의 해’ 선포와 국내에서의 군사적 활동
한국민족운동사연구
2020 .01
-
대한민국임시정부의 3·1절 기념과 3·1운동 인식
한국독립운동사연구
2017 .02
-
대한민국 임시정부와 기독교 : 상호관계의 유형과 특징
한국기독교와 역사
2020 .03
-
대한민국 임시정부의 광복운동자 예우와 순국선열 기념
역사와교육
2021 .01
-
식민지 자본주의의 전개와 3·1운동에 대한 시론적 검토
역사학보
2020 .03
-
대한민국임시정부 수립과정에서 기독교 민족주의자들의 역할
한국교회사학회지
2018 .12
-
상해 대한민국 임시정부의 군사전략과 ‘陸軍臨時軍制’ 변화
역사민속학
2018 .06
-
대한민국 건국의 연속성과 독자성 : 조선왕국에서 대한민국까지
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2016 .03
-
한국교회의 병리현상과 신흥종교운동
한국기독교와 역사
2018 .03
-
1919년 상해 임시정부 수립 과정에 대한 재검토 -임정수립 기념일 논란을 중심으로
역사문화연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-003164508