지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article discusses themes such as trans-humanities, trans-nationalism, trans-identity through Taiwan movies, 〈Cape No.7〉 and 〈Etude〉. Korea and Taiwan are sharing the history of colonization, but two nations possess the same moments with different ways. In Taiwan, the identification is difficult and complicated.
This paper focuses on the ‘Trans-’ in the process of identification of Taiwan. Referring to the survey of ‘Changes in the Taiwanese/Chinese Identity of Taiwanese’(the Election Study Center, NCCU, 1992-2016.12), the results is below. Taiwanese : 17.6%(1992) → 58.2%(2016) Both Taiwanese and Chinese : 46.4%(1992) → 34.3%(2016)Chinese : 25.5%(1992) → 3.4%(2016) What
I am interesting is the figure steady upwards curve of Taiwanese. It means that Taiwanese have chosen their identity as only Taiwanese. The figure of 25.5% as Chinese(1992) was even more than the figure of 17.6% as Taiwanese(1992). Taiwanese identity has been transferred from Chinese and Taiwanese to only Taiwanese. Stuart Hall said that the identity is not given in the fixed conception, is evolving in the process.
In modern history of Korea and Taiwan, national identity was mostly transferred by not arbitrary, for example as a colonist under the imperialism of Japan. Also Taiwan classified into 3 identities given by time when you came to the island of Taiwan such as Native taiwanese, Mainlanders and aborigines. When the national party(Guomintang) ruled Taiwan, Taiwanese were forced to identify themselves as Chinese, then after 90s, when the president Lidenghui governed Taiwan, they have been considering themselves as Taiwanese and the Taiwanese things.
〈Cape No.7〉 have been at the center of controversy, having a pro-Japanese’s review, even if Taiwan had been ruled by Japan. So 〈Cape No.7〉 has been criticized that still can not get out of the colonial view of history. But I wonder why Taiwanese accepted this movie.
The critics on criticizing 〈Cape No.7〉, they are under the views of ‘Sinocentrism’. China has an intention which integrates Taiwan as one nation using mediated memory of colonial history, whereas Taiwan refuses to construction of memory by China, Taiwan tries to reconstruct the memory of Taiwanese. In 〈Etude〉 tried to explore the ‘Taiwanese things’ through crossing island of Taiwan by bike.
So I focuses on the memory and hybridity for the reconstruction of Taiwanese things through these 2 movies. The quests for Identification or Taiwanese things examine the diverse reviews mediated through transnational and regional discourses. It concerns how difficult it has been to create local-ethnographies of what it means to be a dweller in Taiwan through any single historical interpretation.
The memory of colonization can be serving as a mediated memory in the nation-state, such as Korea after Japanese-colonization has focused on the anti-Japan, that is, nationalism for the social unification using the memory of colonization and after Korean war has focused on the anti-communism using the memory of the war, so maintained pro-American.
The memory of colonist has been used as the mediated memory for the unified nation state. The nation needs one homogeneous memory, so some memories uncomfortable for one homogeneous memory could be excluded and forgotten. So this article concerns hybridity and diversity from behind the homogeneous memory.
This paper focuses on the ‘Trans-’ in the process of identification of Taiwan. Referring to the survey of ‘Changes in the Taiwanese/Chinese Identity of Taiwanese’(the Election Study Center, NCCU, 1992-2016.12), the results is below. Taiwanese : 17.6%(1992) → 58.2%(2016) Both Taiwanese and Chinese : 46.4%(1992) → 34.3%(2016)Chinese : 25.5%(1992) → 3.4%(2016) What
I am interesting is the figure steady upwards curve of Taiwanese. It means that Taiwanese have chosen their identity as only Taiwanese. The figure of 25.5% as Chinese(1992) was even more than the figure of 17.6% as Taiwanese(1992). Taiwanese identity has been transferred from Chinese and Taiwanese to only Taiwanese. Stuart Hall said that the identity is not given in the fixed conception, is evolving in the process.
In modern history of Korea and Taiwan, national identity was mostly transferred by not arbitrary, for example as a colonist under the imperialism of Japan. Also Taiwan classified into 3 identities given by time when you came to the island of Taiwan such as Native taiwanese, Mainlanders and aborigines. When the national party(Guomintang) ruled Taiwan, Taiwanese were forced to identify themselves as Chinese, then after 90s, when the president Lidenghui governed Taiwan, they have been considering themselves as Taiwanese and the Taiwanese things.
〈Cape No.7〉 have been at the center of controversy, having a pro-Japanese’s review, even if Taiwan had been ruled by Japan. So 〈Cape No.7〉 has been criticized that still can not get out of the colonial view of history. But I wonder why Taiwanese accepted this movie.
The critics on criticizing 〈Cape No.7〉, they are under the views of ‘Sinocentrism’. China has an intention which integrates Taiwan as one nation using mediated memory of colonial history, whereas Taiwan refuses to construction of memory by China, Taiwan tries to reconstruct the memory of Taiwanese. In 〈Etude〉 tried to explore the ‘Taiwanese things’ through crossing island of Taiwan by bike.
So I focuses on the memory and hybridity for the reconstruction of Taiwanese things through these 2 movies. The quests for Identification or Taiwanese things examine the diverse reviews mediated through transnational and regional discourses. It concerns how difficult it has been to create local-ethnographies of what it means to be a dweller in Taiwan through any single historical interpretation.
The memory of colonization can be serving as a mediated memory in the nation-state, such as Korea after Japanese-colonization has focused on the anti-Japan, that is, nationalism for the social unification using the memory of colonization and after Korean war has focused on the anti-communism using the memory of the war, so maintained pro-American.
The memory of colonist has been used as the mediated memory for the unified nation state. The nation needs one homogeneous memory, so some memories uncomfortable for one homogeneous memory could be excluded and forgotten. So this article concerns hybridity and diversity from behind the homogeneous memory.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 : 나는 대만인
Ⅱ. 기억 : 집단의 기억(Nationalism)에서 개인의 기억(Trans-natioanlism)으로
Ⅲ. 길 : 단일성에서 혼종성으로
Ⅳ. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사회 개선과 지속가능성 확보를 위한 인문학 교육 방안
정책연구
2020 .11
-
‘트랜스-동아시아’ 연구 동향 및 전망 ― 디지털 인문학적 방법론에 입각하여
중국학논총
2024 .09
-
인문학의 확장과 변용: 교정인문학의 방향과 전망
교정담론
2017 .01
-
섬 관광 활성화를 위한 인문학적 접근
관광연구저널
2023 .05
-
주제어 토픽모델링을 통한 IT 인문학 개념의 정립
정보교육학회논문지
2022 .10
-
A study on the Meaning of 「Sea Region」 at Education of Humanities in the School
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .07
-
인문도시지원사업의 현황 및 시사점 : 한국연구재단 선정사업을 중심으로
문화산업연구
2017 .06
-
경기도 인문학사업 발전 방안
정책연구
2016 .12
-
교사들이 이해하는 인문교육의 개념 탐색
한국교육학연구
2017 .01
-
인문학은 누구의 편인가? 노동의 인문학과 정치시민을 위한 논의
시민사회와 NGO
2015 .01
-
인문학과 예술의 접점에 대한 연구 : 미술교육의 인문학적 가치 탐색을 위해
미술과 교육
2020 .04
-
영화를 통한 공학교육과 인문학의 만남
공학교육연구
2015 .01
-
도덕과 인성교육의 쟁점에 관한 일고
도덕윤리과교육
2017 .05
-
디지털인문학과 전자문화지도 -도서『지중해 여정 Mediterranean Passages』의 전자문화지도 구현-
지중해지역연구
2015 .01
-
Trans-National Influence Operations and their Impact on Human Rights in Asia
Global Asia
2023 .06
-
4차 산업혁명 시대의 인문교양교육의 역할과 방향
교양학연구
2017 .06
-
남북러 철도(TKR-TSR) 연결의 정치학 : 과제와 국제협력
국제정치연구
2019 .09
-
위키(WIKI) 플랫폼을 활용한 인문학 교과목의 교육 방법 모색 - 역사, 문화 강좌의 사례 분석을 중심으로
교육방법연구
2022 .08
-
북한 인문학 데이터 아카이브와 디지털 인문학 교육: 빅데이터 혁신융합대학 교과목 개발을 중심으로
통일과 평화
2023 .06
-
인문사회 영재에 대한 질적 사례연구
시민교육연구
2016 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한 · 중 영화교류 1세대 대표 영화인 ‘정기탁’ 연구 : 중국활동시기(1928~1934)를 중심으로
배상국
씨네포럼
2021
.04
포스트-유고슬라비아 영화의 특성과 주제 연구
조준래
노어노문학
2021
.03
아카이브 영화, 비/인종적 몽타주, 역사 쓰기 ―일본군 점령하 인도네시아 수용소 포로를 둘러싼 영화를 읽는 방법
김한상
역사비평
2021
.02
중국 영화에 나타난 공자 이미지의 변화와 특징
위군
종교문화연구
2018
.06
욕망이 충돌하는 일상의 공간, 왕가위 영화의 노마디즘 읽기 : 〈중경삼림〉, 〈화양연화〉,〈2046〉을 중심으로
김소영
영화연구
2018
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-030-002128926