메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
전준택 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.54 No.1
발행연도
2018.3
수록면
27 - 52 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article focuses on three tasks to look into Sheridan’s strategy toward Drury Lane’s playbill of 29 Jan. 1781, consisting of Garrrick’s Florizel and Perdita and Sheridan’s pantomime, Robinson Crusoe and Harlequin Friday. First, to stage Whig political propaganda, Sheridan chose Florizel and Perdita as it became associated with the inappropriate love affair of Prince of Wales and the actress who played the role of Perdita, Mary Robinson. Second, Sheridan intended to satire inappropriateness of George III’s foreign affairs and the Tory policies promoting the legitimacy of the hereditary power. Thus he chose DeFoe’s novel as an Opening of the first part of his pantomime as it was a text embodying both European colonial and nationalist rhetoric, symbolic of beating Spain out of the New World. Third, to upstage George III and the Tory and their policies, Sheridan finally downstaged an uncanny resemblance between the fundamental traits of Friday/Harlequin and himself. Friday/Harlequin/Sheridan humiliated Spanish culture and religion which its contemporary audience would have recognized as the satires of the Tory. Thus after the premiere of the playbill of 1781, Sheridan began to be considered as Harlequin advocating constitutional authority and representative government, middle class values and abolition.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-840-001916759