메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김일영 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
한국근대영미소설학회 근대영미소설 근대영미소설 제24권 제2호
발행연도
2017.8
수록면
61 - 84 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Most critics who regard Foe by Coetzee as a post-colonial text also find in the novel gender criticism, pointing out the similarities between tongueless Friday and voiceless Susan. However, there is no decisive evidence that Friday’s tongue is cut by slavers, and Susan is deprived of her voice by the patriarchal society. Rather, they are contrastive figures belonging to totally different worlds: Susan who is obsessed with telling her own story belongs to the world of language, whereas Friday who does not even have notion of speech belongs to the world of silence, or rather, world of no-language. Each of their worlds can be explained in terms of Lacanian concept of the Symbolic order and the Real, since the Symbolic order is maintained and regulated by language, and the Real is a non-linguistic world, a world before the language/letter. Susan who tries to pursue her own identity through her story realizes that our story is not our own, but Other’s story written in Other’s language, and ultimately acknowledges herself to be a kind of a ghost without substance, or rather a fictional being written by Other/language. Friday, on the contrary, refuses to become a subject by rejecting the Symbolic Order/language. Thus, he maintains the fundamental self not subjected by the language. The reason why the anonymous narrator in the last section of the novel opens Friday’s mouth is that he/she wants to hear what Friday’s silent mouth holds, that is, the ultimate sound of the Lacanian Real which can never be “killed” by language/ letter.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0