메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
우순조 (성결대학교)
저널정보
사단법인 한국언어학회 언어학 언어학 제79호
발행연도
2017.12
수록면
159 - 191 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to draw out a principled account of the phonologically unconditioned tensification in Korean (type 2 tensification, in short). That is, the tensification in point is the effect of a general principle that requires to differentiate homohonous linguistic forms from each other, especially syntactic constructions from morphological constructions in regard to type 2 tensification.
In advance, this paper draws out the generalization that Occurrences of type 2 tensification have syntactic boundaries in common. In order to do so, this paper shows that the so-called stem and endings are actually syntactic words and there are syntactic boundaries between them, and explains that they have been analysed in that way simply because previous analyses are affected by the inadequate application of the notion ‘conjugation’, which is originally invented for inflectional languages, to the alternations of Korean agglutinative elements following verbs and adjectives.
A natural question arises from the fact that type 2 tensification does not occur at each and every syntactic boundaries: What blocks type 2 tensification in candidate constructions?
As the answer to the question, this paper introduces the anti-homophonous constraint which bans from blind application of type 2 tensification. This paper shows that the constraint reasonably explains why lax obstruents after stem-final open syllable do not undergo type 2 tensification. When applied, present tense forms of verbs come to be identical to their past tense conterparts. Context, argument structure, class d’objet or anything else mentioned in relation to the discussion of homonym can not resolve the ambiguity of homophonous linguistic forms caused by type 2 tensificaton. This situation sets us free from vicious circle and provides us with the independent motivation for the introduction of the anti-homophonous constraint.

목차

1. 들어가기
2. 문제 제기
3. 경음화의 몇 가지 측면
4. 통사적 환경과 경음화
5. 식별 강화 효과와 제2유형 경음화
6. 식별 강화 효과 가설의 설명력
7. 마무리
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-710-001808246