메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
서원식 (칭화대학교) 최윤동 (신안산대학교) 김창현 (중원대학교)
저널정보
한국발육발달학회 한국발육발달학회지 한국발육발달학회지 제25권 제3호
발행연도
2017.8
수록면
321 - 328 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to compare the impact of perceived identification in each Taekwondo dimension in Korea and China. This study investigated the impact of each characteristic of Taekwondo on identification and the impact of identification on loyalty by stipulating the characteristics of Taekwondo, gymnasium, and master, which constitute 5-dimension of Taekwondo. For this study, data were collected from Shanghai, Beijing, and Tsingtao in China where Taekwondo is widely spread and from Gangnam and Gangbuk area in Korea. Data collection was carried out between February and March in 2007. Survey is conducted among Taekwondo trainees who are over the age of 10: elementary, middle school, and high school students. 500 Questionnaires in Korea and 250 questionnaires in China each were distributed, and a total of 733 samples were collected. Unfaithful responses were excluded and a total of 688 samples were used for the final data analysis, 449 from Korea and 239 from China. This study divided the dimension of Taekwondo into Taekwondo, gymnasium, and master. The characteristics of Taekwondo were measured by 7 trait categories-mental development, elevation of mental power, physical development, order consciousness, positive attitude, positiveness, and right attitude. The characteristics of gymnasium was measured by 3 items-customer management, training method, and facility. The characteristics of master was measured by intimacy of training method, the clarity of coaching, and eagerness of training method. Identification and loyalty each were measured by 3 items and 4 items by considering previous research.

목차

Abstract
I. 서론
II. 연구 방법
III. 결과 및 논의
IV. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-692-001313869