지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.9
- 수록면
- 59 - 78 (20page)
- DOI
- 10.37967/emh.2017.09.137.59
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The grammatical sum does not form a coherent semantic identity. In the arrangement of the prefinal ending, the following elements add the grammatical and semantic meanings to the preceding elements. In conclusion, the arrangement of the prefinal ending of the estimation－confirmation is composed of the functions of estimation and confirmation and adds the semantic qualities of the information to the assumed element, and the confirmation－estimation undermines grammatical structure by less emphasizing the significance of confirmation. The ‘－리어－’ of the estimationconfirmation and the ‘－어리－’ of the confirmation－estimation have different syntactic structures, leading to different semantic qualities in terms of [±Confirmation]. This is accompanied by a change in the semantic elements of the estimation according to the meaning of the confirmation that precedes to or follows after the ‘－리－’, which is realized in the same form. Specifically, the form of estimation－confirmation carries the semantic element of simple assumption, while functioning to deliver the information. Therefore, the meaning unit of confirmation is not clearly distinguished. On the other hand, confirmation－estimation takes a form of rhetorical questionand therefore conveys the opposite meaning. It strengthens the role of confirmation, by placing the semantic element of the confirmation after the prefinal ending. The sentence of the confirmation－estimation often takes a form of “interrogative －려” (or “interrogative －리어－”) in front of the final ending. On the other hand, confirmation－estimation is associated with ‘－아－ + －리 － + －아 (＜ 가)’. The grammatical arrangement and placement determines different semantic roles.
If ‘－리－’ is realized in the form of estimation, it can be used to express the semantic differences determined byaccording to the order of arrangement. However, as a result, this research shows that ‘－리₁－’, which is settled in the form of estimation－confirmation, and ‘－리₂－’, is realized in a form of the confirmation－estimation, and the both are originally different grammatical elements. In a historical sense, there is no precedent to ‘－리₁－’ coming before the prefinal endings of ‘－거/어－아－’, except for ‘－리₂－’. ‘★’ and ‘★’ in Sǒktok kugyǒl during the Koryǒ period, which reveals the historical trajectory of the grammar functions corresponding to ‘ － 리₁－’ and ‘－ 리₂－’ of the 15th century Korea, respectively. For example, ‘★’ functions as the prefinal ending and ‘★’ functions as the interrogative ending in combination with interrogative auxiliary element.
In the 15th century, ‘－리₁－’ and ‘－리₂－’ show different grammatical categorization, as the ‘－리－’ element was originally a combination of two or more morphemes, not a single morpheme, deriving from other grammatical elements. The element was drawn from a combination of a gerund ending and a copula, but ‘리₁－’ and ‘－리₂－’ were differentiated by which prefinal ending the element is being combined with. The two forms derived from the grammaticalization process of the interrogative endings and formed new grammar categories. Although they contain different semantic compositions, their properties indicates that they share the semantic function of the estimation.
If ‘－리－’ is realized in the form of estimation, it can be used to express the semantic differences determined byaccording to the order of arrangement. However, as a result, this research shows that ‘－리₁－’, which is settled in the form of estimation－confirmation, and ‘－리₂－’, is realized in a form of the confirmation－estimation, and the both are originally different grammatical elements. In a historical sense, there is no precedent to ‘－리₁－’ coming before the prefinal endings of ‘－거/어－아－’, except for ‘－리₂－’. ‘★’ and ‘★’ in Sǒktok kugyǒl during the Koryǒ period, which reveals the historical trajectory of the grammar functions corresponding to ‘ － 리₁－’ and ‘－ 리₂－’ of the 15th century Korea, respectively. For example, ‘★’ functions as the prefinal ending and ‘★’ functions as the interrogative ending in combination with interrogative auxiliary element.
In the 15th century, ‘－리₁－’ and ‘－리₂－’ show different grammatical categorization, as the ‘－리－’ element was originally a combination of two or more morphemes, not a single morpheme, deriving from other grammatical elements. The element was drawn from a combination of a gerund ending and a copula, but ‘리₁－’ and ‘－리₂－’ were differentiated by which prefinal ending the element is being combined with. The two forms derived from the grammaticalization process of the interrogative endings and formed new grammar categories. Although they contain different semantic compositions, their properties indicates that they share the semantic function of the estimation.
목차
1. 서론
2. 추측확인법과 확인추측법의 의미
3. 추측확인법과 확인추측법의 기원
4. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘해’체 어미의 의문법 실현 양상
언어학
2018 .12
-
의문사 구성의 한중 대조 연구 -비의문 표현을 중심으로-
언어학연구
2024 .08
-
학술 텍스트에서 ‘-는가/(으)ㄴ가’, ‘-나’, ‘-(으)ㄹ까’의 의미와 의문문의 담화 기능
언어학 연구
2023 .01
-
의문 용언 ‘어떠하－’와 ‘어찌하－’에 대한 몇 가지 관견
어문학
2018 .12
-
20세기 전반기 종결어미의 감탄법 실현 양상
어문론집
2019 .09
-
국어 명사절의 범위에 대한 비판적 고찰
국어교육연구
2022 .02
-
중국인 학습자의 확인의문문 억양 연구
이중언어학
2017 .01
-
한국어교육을 위한 화용론적 관점의 한국어 의문문 연구 - 한·영 병렬 말뭉치 기반 대조분석을 중심으로 -
어문론집
2025 .03
-
의문문 형성 표지로부터 발달하는 선어말어미 상당구성과 담화표지에 대하여: ‘-다아니-’/‘아이가’(동남방언)와 ‘-지뭐(이)-’/‘뭐’를 중심으로
언어와 정보사회
2020 .01
-
명사절 기능의 의문형 종결 어미
형태론
2024 .05
-
해라체 의문형 종결어미 {-니}의 형성
국어사연구
2020 .01
-
TV 토론 텍스트에 나타난 의문 표현의 설득 전략 연구
겨레어문학
2016 .12
-
여성결혼이민자를 위한 한국어 방언 종결어미 연구 - 안동 방언의 비격식체 의문형 어미 ‘해’체를 중심으로 -
언어와언어학
2016 .01
-
의문형 종결어미 ‘-(으)ㄹ까(요)’의 담화 기능 연구
언어사실과 관점
2019 .01
-
15세기 국어 연결어미에 결합한 [더+시] 통합순서의 변화에 대한 管見
돈암어문학
2016 .06
-
의문사의 기능 확대 용법
한민족문화연구
2018 .01
-
중 · 한 의문사 ‘誰’와 ‘누구’의 비의문 지칭기능 대조 연구
중국어문학논집
2015 .06
-
양태 표현 ‘-(으)ᄅ까 보-’, ‘-나 보-’에 대하여
언어과학연구
2023 .06
-
여성결혼이민자를 위한 한국어 방언 문법 교육 기초 연구 - 안동 방언의 ‘해라’체 의문형 어미를 중심으로 -
언어와 문화
2016 .01
-
<伍倫全備諺解>에 나타난 의문법 어미 연구
동양고전연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-810-001362482