지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제104호
- 발행연도
- 2017.6
- 수록면
- 229 - 262 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2017.06.104.229
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is aim to know the meaning of king’s a posthumous epithet(國王諡號) between Korea and China in early 14th century. The period from late Goryeo to early Joseon was the period of changing in east asia. Goryeo and Joseon had to prepare for the new world powers, Yuan(元) and Ming(明) dynasty and the new period in the same time. So they quickly took action to the changes of international situation. The king’s a posthumous epithet appeared in the relation between Korea and China in 14th century was a result of this quick action.
Goryeo strengthened their royal authority. As a result they emphasized the relationship with the emperor of Ming dynasty by King’s a Posthumous Epithet. But Goryeo didn"t requested for it regularly because it was according on the political situation. Joseon used king’s a posthumous epithet as the tool to materialize their ideals. Especially Joseon emphasized The peaceful international order through mutual coexistence based on Confucian thought(事大字小) at relationship with Ming dynasty.
Ming dynasty also sought the same international order with Joseon. Joseon tried to build the trust with Ming dynasty by show them the image of feudal lord they wanted. For Joseon the king"s a posthumous epithet was important point with showing their trust to Ming dynasty. In this reason Joseon modified and maintained this formality, even though it was different with other east asian countries in the same period.
even without considering the relation with Ming dynasty, king’s a posthumous epithet was an important formality for Joseon. It’s because Joseon was a country sought the ideal society of confucian. For Joseon the grant of king’s a posthumous epithet, which is symbolizing feudal lord of the emperor of Ming dynasty was important tool to strengthen their legitimacy. In this reason, unlike Goryeo, Joseon asked for king’s a posthumous epithet to China whenever the king died.
The king’s a posthumous epithet symbolized that Goryeo and Joseon was the vassal status of Yuan or Ming dynasty. But there were also purposes like existence the nation and confucian ideological intention. There was no pluralistic order in this period, but they had to maintain the country and prepare for the new era. It’s the reason we can see the worries of Goryeo and Joseon from the king’s a posthumous epithet.
Goryeo strengthened their royal authority. As a result they emphasized the relationship with the emperor of Ming dynasty by King’s a Posthumous Epithet. But Goryeo didn"t requested for it regularly because it was according on the political situation. Joseon used king’s a posthumous epithet as the tool to materialize their ideals. Especially Joseon emphasized The peaceful international order through mutual coexistence based on Confucian thought(事大字小) at relationship with Ming dynasty.
Ming dynasty also sought the same international order with Joseon. Joseon tried to build the trust with Ming dynasty by show them the image of feudal lord they wanted. For Joseon the king"s a posthumous epithet was important point with showing their trust to Ming dynasty. In this reason Joseon modified and maintained this formality, even though it was different with other east asian countries in the same period.
even without considering the relation with Ming dynasty, king’s a posthumous epithet was an important formality for Joseon. It’s because Joseon was a country sought the ideal society of confucian. For Joseon the grant of king’s a posthumous epithet, which is symbolizing feudal lord of the emperor of Ming dynasty was important tool to strengthen their legitimacy. In this reason, unlike Goryeo, Joseon asked for king’s a posthumous epithet to China whenever the king died.
The king’s a posthumous epithet symbolized that Goryeo and Joseon was the vassal status of Yuan or Ming dynasty. But there were also purposes like existence the nation and confucian ideological intention. There was no pluralistic order in this period, but they had to maintain the country and prepare for the new era. It’s the reason we can see the worries of Goryeo and Joseon from the king’s a posthumous epithet.
목차
서론
1. 원 간섭기 대원관계와 국왕시호
2. 원·명 교체기 대명관계와 국왕시호
결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
諡號, 조선시대 官僚形 인물의 死後 品格(1)
영주어문
2018 .01
-
영조대 숙빈 최씨 추숭과 가상시호加上諡號의 의의
국학연구
2023 .07
-
대한제국기 追贈·諡號 제도의 변화와 追贈文書·諡號文書 연구
장서각
2021 .10
-
조선시대 포은(圃隱) 정몽주 치제의례(致祭儀禮)
포은학연구
2019 .01
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
朝鮮 初期 中國語 通譯 發展 背景에 관한 硏究 －≪朝鮮王朝實錄≫의 記錄을 中心으로－
중국어문학
2015 .01
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
고려 전기 국왕 諡號制의 내용과 그 의미
한국사학보
2021 .02
-
朝鮮王朝“三唐”詩人的宗唐詩風與元明詩學
열상고전연구
2015 .08
-
백제의 시호제(諡號制)와 시호(諡號)의 함의
백제학보
2020 .01
-
조선후기 刀劒 素材 科擧 答案사례에 대한 一考察 -｢劒策問｣과 ｢劒對策文｣을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
To Remember the Ming: Eighteenth-Century Joseon Envoys and their Interpreters on the Ming-Qing Transition
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2022 .06
-
‘조선’ 국호로 본 여말선초의 역사인식과 이상국가론
역사와현실
2018 .06
-
五山禪僧의 對中國 집단학습활동을 통한 관련 지식 축적 및 인식 전파에 관한 연구(3)- 글로 배운 중국, 目睹한 중국 -
인문학연구
2024 .09
-
명 · 청 교체기 대명 사신과 거주민의 교류 - 최현의 『조천일록』을 중심으로 -
한국문학과 예술
2022 .09
-
The Zhonghua Community Strategy in the Early Joseon Dynasty: The Establishment of Rituals and the Change in Ming’s Attitude toward Joseon
Korea Journal
2023 .12
-
고려 국왕 즉위에 관한 외교 형식의 변화와 의미
역사문화연구
2023 .05
-
1598년 조선 조정의 명군지휘부 접촉과 전쟁국면 調整
史叢(사총)
2024 .09
-
Liu Yi’s Surrender to the Ming and the Nature of Goryeo Missions to the Ming Dynasty
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2022 .06
-
조선 전기 朝明외교관계의 함수, ‘禮義之國’
대동문화연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001052349