지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제103호
- 발행연도
- 2017.3
- 수록면
- 119 - 151 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2017.03.103.119
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Studies of the Colonial authorities’ forest policy, during the Japanese occupation period, have so far concentrated upon examining how the forest resources were managed and exploited. As it was important for the authorities to survey the overall size of Joseon forests (and who owned them as well) in order to manage and monitor forest resources efficiently and effectively, colonial authorities launched certain projects in such vein, and those projects have been well studied by today’s researchers.
Yet how the authorities were endowed with such power over forests, as well as the right to manage forests in the first place, was somewhat absent from previous studies. With the intention to compensate for such absence, the issue of forest protection will be examined in this article, in terms of the authorities’ supposed plans for fire fighting, which the colonial authorities claimed as stemming from their will to protect and preserve forests. By doing so we may see how the issue of forest fires entered the realm of state management to begin with.
Of course, forest fires were initially never the priority of concern for colonial authorities, as earlier they had no reason to deem the issue either worthy or necessary. It was only natural for them to turn their attention to such issue (forest fires) in times when the Bukseon reclamation project was launched and wartime mobilization was firing up full scale. The authorities had to monitor all those forest fires because they needed all the woods they could get, and that was how forest fires entered their range of interests. With a systemic preservation policy in place, at least some of the forest fires may have been prevented. But the effect such policy ultimately had upon the forests in general should be assessed from a more balanced point of view, as such policy was intent upon utilizing all the forest resources, just as much as it was claimed to be interested in preserving them. In that regard, forest fires should be considered as a topic that could reveal both the effects and shortcomings of the colonial authorities’ intentions and efforts.
Yet how the authorities were endowed with such power over forests, as well as the right to manage forests in the first place, was somewhat absent from previous studies. With the intention to compensate for such absence, the issue of forest protection will be examined in this article, in terms of the authorities’ supposed plans for fire fighting, which the colonial authorities claimed as stemming from their will to protect and preserve forests. By doing so we may see how the issue of forest fires entered the realm of state management to begin with.
Of course, forest fires were initially never the priority of concern for colonial authorities, as earlier they had no reason to deem the issue either worthy or necessary. It was only natural for them to turn their attention to such issue (forest fires) in times when the Bukseon reclamation project was launched and wartime mobilization was firing up full scale. The authorities had to monitor all those forest fires because they needed all the woods they could get, and that was how forest fires entered their range of interests. With a systemic preservation policy in place, at least some of the forest fires may have been prevented. But the effect such policy ultimately had upon the forests in general should be assessed from a more balanced point of view, as such policy was intent upon utilizing all the forest resources, just as much as it was claimed to be interested in preserving them. In that regard, forest fires should be considered as a topic that could reveal both the effects and shortcomings of the colonial authorities’ intentions and efforts.
목차
머리말
1. 식민지시기 산불현황
2. 산림정책의 변화와 산불문제 인식
3. 식민당국의 산불관리
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1930년대 북선제지화학공업(주)의 설립과 운영
역사와경계
2022 .08
-
삼림을 개척하라
신학정론
2022 .12
-
산의 경관 및 자연에 대한 인식의 역사적 변화 : 울진군에서 시행된 산림녹화사업과 화전정리사업 사례를 중심으로
비교문화연구
2017 .01
-
삼국 초중기의 숲 인식 변화
역사와현실
2017 .03
-
Реализация государственной политики по охране лесов на Алтае в период революций и гражданской войны (1917-1919 гг.)
러시아학
2017 .01
-
청산도 마을숲의 기능 분석 및 보전 방안
문학과환경
2015 .09
-
15~19세기 한반도 산림의 민간 개방과 숲의 변화
역사와현실
2017 .03
-
일제의 조선 산림 관습조사와 그 성격
한국민족문화
2018 .08
-
Reclamation Projects and Development of Agricultural Land in Colonial Korea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2018 .12
-
일제의 임야대부 정책과 그 성격 : 1910, 1920년대 대부 실태와 경영을 중심으로
한국민족문화
2016 .02
-
영아가 경험하는 숲체험놀이의 의미
생애학회지
2019 .01
-
고려시대 山林政策에 대한 기초적 검토 : 산림정책의 推移를 중심으로
사학연구
2019 .03
-
이주홍 작품의 화전민과 메아리 모티프의 변모 양상
한국문학논총
2016 .01
-
1910년대 일제의 국유림구분조사 과정과 법률적 성격
한국사연구
2019 .12
-
삼척군 원덕면 일대 임야측량사건과 산림자원의 약탈
지방사와 지방문화
2016 .05
-
화전을 준비하는 시기별 화전의 유형과 그 특징
한국민속학
2023 .11
-
일제의 한국삼림특별회계법 제정 배경과 영림창 운영의 성격(1905~1910)
도시연구
2024 .07
-
북한의 민간자원 동원정책과 일상적 동원체제의 형성(1945~1953)
한국사연구
2016 .12
-
개발과 이윤 추구에 갇힌 산림보호 : 식민지 임업가 사이토 오토사쿠(齋藤音作)를 중심으로
역사와현실
2017 .03
-
숲놀이 관련 연구 동향 분석: 국내 학위 논문 중심으로
기독교교육 논총
2022 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
1930년대 북선제지화학공업(주)의 설립과 운영
강정원
역사와경계
2022
.08
세계화시대 인구이동이 경제발전에 끼치는 함의 : 재브라질 한인사회를 중심으로
최금좌
디아스포라연구
2016
.12
대만ㆍ조선의 ‘식민지근대’의 격차 : 경찰 부문의 비교를 통하여
문명기
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2013
.05
일계인(日系人) 디아스포라의 민족공동체 형성 고찰 : 일계브라질인과 일계아메리카인 민족공동체의 사례
임영언
디아스포라연구
2010
.06
역법 문제와 한국사 서술 : 날짜 표기의 혼란과 오류
丘凡眞
역사교육
2005
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-002415648