메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
법무부 국제법무정책과 통상법률 통상법률 제60호
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
12 - 28 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A WTO panel reviewing consistency of a national anti-dumping investigation with the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement faces the issue of whether to include in its review confidential information that was not previously available to the WTO member whose exporters had been subject to investigation. The provisions of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement fail to provide a clear guidance to the panel faced with this issue. On the one hand, admitting all relevant information provided to the panel, including confidential information, enhances a WTO panels ability to make an informed decision. On the other hand, admitting previously undisclosed information is arguably prejudicial to the complainant country that had to make the decision to bring the case to the panel without being completely informed of all available facts. This unsettled question as to the evidentiary scope of a WTO panels review is lately resolved by the Appellate Bodys decision in Thailand - H-Beams. The Appellate Body expanded the authority of a WTO panel to admit evidence, holding that a panel is not prevented from examining analysis and reasoning in documents that had not been disclosed to interested parties during a national anti-dumping investigation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-002329708