지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
An anti-dumping measure shall be applied in the WTO Anti-dumping Code, on the condition that dumping, by which products one country are introduced into the commerce of another country at less than the normal value of the products, is to be condemned if it causes or threatens material injury to an established industry in the importing country or materially retards the establishment of a domestic industry. Therefore the purpose of this study is to improve the legislative policy of Korea on procedures regulations for Anti-dumping measure. This shall be performed through a comparative law study between Korea and EU(European Community), on a basis of WTO Anti-dumping Code. Pursuant to WTO Anti -dumping Code, as a general rule an investigation to determine the existence, degree and effect of any alleged dumping shall be initiated upon a written application by or on behalf of the domestic industry.
There is no difference in relation to the criteria of legitimate delegation of the domestic industry between Korea and EU. In cases in which any interested party do not fulfill its cooperative obligation to the authorities's investigation for an anti-dumping measure, Korea is given less appropriate authorty to cope with it than EU in Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure. When the authorities have limited their examination in accordance with 10 of article 6 in WTO Anti-dumping Code, Korea is permitted also less authorty than EU to exclude the weighted average margin of dumping estalished with respect to the selected exporters or producers for any anti-dumping duty applied to imports from exporters or producers not included in the examination.
A necessary condition in Korea Anti-dumping Act less precise than EU Antidumping Act for extention to duration of the application of provisionan measure, review of anti-dumping duties and other procedures regulations. EU regulate circumvention in Anti-dumping Act, on the other hand Korea impose legal controls in Rules of Origin. As a result of the above comperative analysis on Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure in Customs Administrative Law between Korea and EU, it should be necessary to legislate definitely Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure in Korea Customs Administrative Law and to complement rules of anti-circumvention in it.
There is no difference in relation to the criteria of legitimate delegation of the domestic industry between Korea and EU. In cases in which any interested party do not fulfill its cooperative obligation to the authorities's investigation for an anti-dumping measure, Korea is given less appropriate authorty to cope with it than EU in Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure. When the authorities have limited their examination in accordance with 10 of article 6 in WTO Anti-dumping Code, Korea is permitted also less authorty than EU to exclude the weighted average margin of dumping estalished with respect to the selected exporters or producers for any anti-dumping duty applied to imports from exporters or producers not included in the examination.
A necessary condition in Korea Anti-dumping Act less precise than EU Antidumping Act for extention to duration of the application of provisionan measure, review of anti-dumping duties and other procedures regulations. EU regulate circumvention in Anti-dumping Act, on the other hand Korea impose legal controls in Rules of Origin. As a result of the above comperative analysis on Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure in Customs Administrative Law between Korea and EU, it should be necessary to legislate definitely Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure in Korea Customs Administrative Law and to complement rules of anti-circumvention in it.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 問題의 提起
Ⅱ. GATT/WTO法上 반덤핑節次에 관한 規範原則
Ⅲ. 韓國 關稅行政法上 덤핑規制에 관한 節次法規
Ⅳ. EU 關稅行政法上 반덤핑에 관한 節次法規
Ⅴ. 韓國 關稅行政法上 반덤핑節次法規의 比較法的 評價 및 改善方案
參考文獻
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1998 / WTO體制下에서의 美國 및 EU 반덤핑法制의 分析
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2005 / Global 經濟時代에서의 韓國 關稅行政法에 관한 硏究 不公正貿易規制法規와 義務違反制裁法規를 중심으로
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1994 / Agreement on Implementation of Article Ⅵ of GATT1994 의 逐條解釋 그 영향 및 對應方案에 대한 硏究
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2003 / 外國物品輸入에 대한 우리나라 政府의 반덤핑措置가 國內同種産業에 미치는 영향에 관한 實證的 硏究
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1999 / WTO 반덤핑制度의 問題點과 改善方向에 관한 硏究
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2005 / Global 經濟時代에서의 韓國 關稅行政法에 관한 硏究 不公正貿易規制法規와 義務違反制裁法規를 중심으로
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1994 / Agreement on Implementation of Article Ⅵ of GATT1994 의 逐條解釋 그 영향 및 對應方案에 대한 硏究
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 2003 / 外國物品輸入에 대한 우리나라 政府의 반덤핑措置가 國內同種産業에 미치는 영향에 관한 實證的 硏究
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1999 / WTO 반덤핑制度의 問題點과 改善方向에 관한 硏究
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국반덤핑제도와 WTO규정과의 부합성
경영법률
2007 .01
-
Current Status of Anti-Dumping Investigations: The Korean Perspective
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2016 .12
-
중국의 불공정무역 조사제도 현황과 운용에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2010 .02
-
A Study on Anti-Dumping Measures of China and Countermeasures of Korea
관세학회지
2005 .12
-
중국 반덤핑법제상의 문제점과 해결방안
통상정보연구
2010 .09
-
반덤핑협정의 문제점 및 개정방향-WTO체제적 접근
법학논집
2003 .01
-
1997년 한ㆍ미 D램 분쟁에 대한 WTO 패널보고서의 비판적 분석
국제경제법연구
2004 .12
-
중국 반덤핑 사실과 절차에 관한 考察
무역상무연구
2006 .08
-
A Study on Measures against Unfair Trade between South Korea and Major Countries in Asia : Focus on Anti-dumping
관세학회지
2010 .05
-
WTO 규범에 근거한 중국 반덤핑 법규의 비교 연구
관세학회지
2006 .12
-
미국과 중국의 반덤핑조치에 영향을 미치는 정치·경제적 요인 분석
경영경제연구
2019 .08
-
EU 반덤핑법상 피해의 개념 및 그 결정 기준에 관한 고찰
유럽연구
1999 .06
-
WTO 국제규범과 우리나라 반덤핑제도개선의 선별성에 관한 연구 : 동종물품해석, 재심사, 우회수출의 쟁점을 중심으로
관세학회지
2001 .08
-
중국의 반덤핑 규제요인에 관한 연구 : 한ㆍ중 양국간 산업경쟁력을 중심으로
무역학회지
2005 .04
-
WTO 반덤핑협정 제2.4.2조에 의거한 네거티브 덤핑마진 산정 방식(“제로잉”)의 법적 문제
무역상무연구
2008 .05
-
中韩两国的反倾销制度比较研究
중국법연구
2008 .01
-
THE FUNCTION OF ANTI-DUMPING IN THE WORLD TRADE SYSTEM
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2000 .12
-
중국의 신 반덤핑조례의 특징과 그 한계에 관한 고찰
무역학회지
2006 .02
-
ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION : SOME PROBLEMS
법학연구
2000 .12
-
미국의 司法的 반덤핑법이 WTO에 위배되는지의 여부
문화산업연구
2001 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002832575