메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국관세학회 관세학회지 關稅學會誌 第6卷 第4號
발행연도
2005.12
수록면
15 - 48 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
An anti-dumping measure shall be applied in the WTO Anti-dumping Code, on the condition that dumping, by which products one country are introduced into the commerce of another country at less than the normal value of the products, is to be condemned if it causes or threatens material injury to an established industry in the importing country or materially retards the establishment of a domestic industry. Therefore the purpose of this study is to improve the legislative policy of Korea on procedures regulations for Anti-dumping measure. This shall be performed through a comparative law study between Korea and EU(European Community), on a basis of WTO Anti-dumping Code. Pursuant to WTO Anti -dumping Code, as a general rule an investigation to determine the existence, degree and effect of any alleged dumping shall be initiated upon a written application by or on behalf of the domestic industry.
There is no difference in relation to the criteria of legitimate delegation of the domestic industry between Korea and EU. In cases in which any interested party do not fulfill its cooperative obligation to the authorities's investigation for an anti-dumping measure, Korea is given less appropriate authorty to cope with it than EU in Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure. When the authorities have limited their examination in accordance with 10 of article 6 in WTO Anti-dumping Code, Korea is permitted also less authorty than EU to exclude the weighted average margin of dumping estalished with respect to the selected exporters or producers for any anti-dumping duty applied to imports from exporters or producers not included in the examination.
A necessary condition in Korea Anti-dumping Act less precise than EU Antidumping Act for extention to duration of the application of provisionan measure, review of anti-dumping duties and other procedures regulations. EU regulate circumvention in Anti-dumping Act, on the other hand Korea impose legal controls in Rules of Origin. As a result of the above comperative analysis on Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure in Customs Administrative Law between Korea and EU, it should be necessary to legislate definitely Procedures Regulations for an Anti-dumping Measure in Korea Customs Administrative Law and to complement rules of anti-circumvention in it.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 問題의 提起
Ⅱ. GATT/WTO法上 반덤핑節次에 관한 規範原則
Ⅲ. 韓國 關稅行政法上 덤핑規制에 관한 節次法規
Ⅳ. EU 關稅行政法上 반덤핑에 관한 節次法規
Ⅴ. 韓國 關稅行政法上 반덤핑節次法規의 比較法的 評價 및 改善方案
參考文獻

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002832575