메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 법학연구소 법학논집 법학논집 제7권 제2호
발행연도
2003.1
수록면
167 - 186 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Doha New Round of WTO negotiations has adopted as its agenda not only trade liberalization but also such an ambitious issue as clarifying and improving WTO rules. This means that the WTO system is now passing through ‘take-off’ stage and enters into the next stage of ‘drive-to-maturity’, in which predictability, judicialization, and horizontal balance(parallelism) among its rules are empathized. At this juncture, Korea as a major state interested in the anti-dumping rules must perform a systemic review of the rules and garner supports from like-minded countries. In doing this, Korea has to pay careful attention to ‘systemic issues’ for which focus is to be given on proper balance and relationship between anti-dumping rules and the rest of the WTO jurisprudence. Thus, it is necessary to identify systemic problems of the existing anti-dumping rules and to produce directions of their amendment. The followings are the summary: First, it should be noted that the standards of de minims margin and negligible imports in anti-dumping rules are not in line with comparable standards of countervailing rules. Given that both sets of rules are sharing a common function of dealing with unfair trade, the same or parallel standards must be adopted in both rules. Second, the Anti-dumping Agreement provides a unique standard of review which is vastly different from the general standard of review. It needs to be examined whether this anti-dumping standard should be abrogated or, at least, be changed to another form which is more acceptable from the systemic perspective. Third, in order to prevent the ‘chain complaint’ phenomenon, the Anti-dumping Agreement must provide that re-initiation of the anti-dumping investigation is prohibited during a certain time period after the conclusion of a prior investigation procedure. In this light, comparable provisions in the Safeguard Agreement must be referred to. Fourth, it is widely known that one-and-half year period of WTO dispute settlement procedure costs large expense to enterprises subject to anti-dumping regulations. Thus, anti-dumping rules should establish the ‘fast-track’ dispute settlement procedure in parallel with the actionable subsidy rules. Fifth, the ‘like product’ concept in the anti-dumping context must be clarified so as not to include ‘potential or future competition’ factor in the concept. Sixth, mutual exemption of anti-dumping duty imposition between parties to a regional trade agreement is permitted under interpretation of current rules. It could be considered to clarify this understanding through adding a relevant provision to the Anti-dumping Agreement. Seventh, it may be considered to introduce a new anti-dumping system based on the ‘traffic-lights theory’, according to which anti-dumping investigations are limited to cases where export prices are lower than average total production cost, but higher than average variable production cost, of the enterprise subject to the investigation.
#WTO 반덤핑협정 #뉴라운드 #국제통상법 상의 체제적 이슈 #반덤핑제도 개정방향 #Anti-dumping Agreement #New Round #Systemic Issues #Amendment of anti-dumping rules

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0