메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
법무부 국제법무정책과 통상법률 통상법률 제53호
발행연도
2003.10
수록면
12 - 34 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
One of the main reasons for the dispute on GPA in GATT was the diffusion of public enterprises around the world. Public enterprises and other organization concerned with governments were targets discussed in GPA of UR. But these days, we don't have critical standard about the enterprises depending on the degree of the government's control influence. Moreover, it is still argued whether privatized companies, which were public enterprises before, should be included in the agreements or not. Currently public enterprises have been privatized to improve the inefficiency worldwide. Many public enterprises have already privatized and have been privatizing in Korea, too. Taking a good look at the Article 24 of WTO GPA, privatized companies which were public enterprises are not automatically excluded from the GPA list. It should be proved that government's controls have effectively eliminated and all of the membership countries need to agree that situation without the objection. Now how can we prove that the government's control has effectively eliminated in proper way? It is quite difficult to judge because WTO GPA doesn't clearly recommended the appropriate standard. The privatized companies should be withdrawn in WTO GPA list. If they are not withdrawn because of insufficient preparation about the standard, many of side effects can be produced in the company. The right of management could be infringed and the efficiency of procurement could be diminished, which can be against the main purpose of privatization. To solve the problems, the standard of withdrawal from WTO GPA list for the privatized companies should clearly be created. So this paper is trying to examine the standard of withdrawing those privatized companies, which were public enterprises.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-002327562