지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is for examining the essence of Sa-cheongseong(淸聲) and the errors of Sa-cheongseong about 12Yul(律), centering around 〈discussing that Sa-cheongseong(淸聲) arises〉 from discussion part, and 〈defending that 4Cheong(淸) is Cheong(淸) of 5Cheong(五淸), not Cheongseong(淸聲) of 12Yul〉 from defense part in articles about Sa-cheongseong from Jeong, yak-yong’s 『Akseogojon』(樂書孤存).
First, that Sa-cheongseongs are sounds among 5 sounds is the basic premise by Jeong, yak-yong. The reason is, a sound would be very low if it is lower than Gung(宮) and a sound would be very high if it is higher than Woo(羽). So he claimed that a saint made Cheongseong(淸聲) at Gung(宮) · Sang(商) · Gak(角) · Chi(徵). That is, the 9 sound system is finally made up of ‘Gung(宮) · Cheonggung(淸宮) · Sang(商) · Cheongsang(淸商) · Gak(角) · Cheonggak(淸角) · Chi(徵) · Cheongchi(淸徵) · Woo(羽)’. Also Sa-cheongseong is same with ‘4Sang’(四上) · ‘4So’(四少) · ‘4Yun’(四閏) · ‘4Byeon’(四變), and so is the system.
Second, Jeong, yak-yong told 〈4Cheong is Cheong(淸) of 5Cheong, not Cheongseong of 12Yul〉. This is the problem raised between 12Yul and Sa-cheongseong, which is not well recognized now in Korean Music Academia. Jeong, yak-yong criticized Chuyeon(鄒衍) and Yeobulwi(呂不韋)’s Seongungjibeop(旋宮之法), since he thought that they deliberately added 4Yul(律) to Yichik(夷則)․Namyeo(南呂) · Muyeok(無射) · Uengjong(應鐘) to make 5 sounds system so that it can play a role as Seongung(旋宮). Moreover, he thought that the newly-made 4Yul(律), Cheonghwngjong[潢], Cheongdaeryeo[汏], Cheongtaeju[汰], Cheonghyeopjong[浹], were named samely with Sa-cheongseong(四淸聲) of O-seong(五聲) by theorists so that there becomes an error for the article of Sa-cheongseong. In addition, he claimed that there is no reason to add 4 stairs to 6Yul(律) since it has several grades. and he thought if there were Cheongseong(淸聲) in 12Yul, all the 12Yul had to have Cheongseong. Thus, he raised a question about the reason they made only Sa-cheongseongs. And he also doubted who to follow because the articles of Sa-cheongseong about 12Yul are all different depending on theorists.
Furthermore, this paper discusses whether Pyeonjong(編鐘) which has 16 bells is an original shape or not, focusing on ‘Sa(肆)’ of Gajong(歌鍾) 2Sa(肆) which Jung Dynasty person gave to Qin Dynasty marquis. In this part, the point is that we can not know what shape ‘Sa’(肆) has exactly, because there is no accurate standard letters such as ‘Sa’(肆) or ‘Do’(堵) which are from the difference of translation from Jeonghyeon(鄭玄) and Duye(杜預). Thus, I can’t be sure if the 16 bells is 1Je(劑), which Jeonghyeon(鄭玄) translated with 『Jurye』(周禮) on the basis of Han(漢) Dynasty music system. Also, there is no sentence like that in scriptures. Therefore, Dasan(茶山) suggested a sentence, ‘Music instrument makes 12Yul as its custom, and 12Seong(十二聲) as its standard’ from 『Jurye』(周禮) 「Jeondongjik」 (典同職). And he doubted if we should believe and iconize Jeonghyeon’s annotation without considering any sentences in scriptures which could be significant grounds. Finally, he expressed the legitimacy of Pyeonjong(編鐘) which is made of 12 bells.
First, that Sa-cheongseongs are sounds among 5 sounds is the basic premise by Jeong, yak-yong. The reason is, a sound would be very low if it is lower than Gung(宮) and a sound would be very high if it is higher than Woo(羽). So he claimed that a saint made Cheongseong(淸聲) at Gung(宮) · Sang(商) · Gak(角) · Chi(徵). That is, the 9 sound system is finally made up of ‘Gung(宮) · Cheonggung(淸宮) · Sang(商) · Cheongsang(淸商) · Gak(角) · Cheonggak(淸角) · Chi(徵) · Cheongchi(淸徵) · Woo(羽)’. Also Sa-cheongseong is same with ‘4Sang’(四上) · ‘4So’(四少) · ‘4Yun’(四閏) · ‘4Byeon’(四變), and so is the system.
Second, Jeong, yak-yong told 〈4Cheong is Cheong(淸) of 5Cheong, not Cheongseong of 12Yul〉. This is the problem raised between 12Yul and Sa-cheongseong, which is not well recognized now in Korean Music Academia. Jeong, yak-yong criticized Chuyeon(鄒衍) and Yeobulwi(呂不韋)’s Seongungjibeop(旋宮之法), since he thought that they deliberately added 4Yul(律) to Yichik(夷則)․Namyeo(南呂) · Muyeok(無射) · Uengjong(應鐘) to make 5 sounds system so that it can play a role as Seongung(旋宮). Moreover, he thought that the newly-made 4Yul(律), Cheonghwngjong[潢], Cheongdaeryeo[汏], Cheongtaeju[汰], Cheonghyeopjong[浹], were named samely with Sa-cheongseong(四淸聲) of O-seong(五聲) by theorists so that there becomes an error for the article of Sa-cheongseong. In addition, he claimed that there is no reason to add 4 stairs to 6Yul(律) since it has several grades. and he thought if there were Cheongseong(淸聲) in 12Yul, all the 12Yul had to have Cheongseong. Thus, he raised a question about the reason they made only Sa-cheongseongs. And he also doubted who to follow because the articles of Sa-cheongseong about 12Yul are all different depending on theorists.
Furthermore, this paper discusses whether Pyeonjong(編鐘) which has 16 bells is an original shape or not, focusing on ‘Sa(肆)’ of Gajong(歌鍾) 2Sa(肆) which Jung Dynasty person gave to Qin Dynasty marquis. In this part, the point is that we can not know what shape ‘Sa’(肆) has exactly, because there is no accurate standard letters such as ‘Sa’(肆) or ‘Do’(堵) which are from the difference of translation from Jeonghyeon(鄭玄) and Duye(杜預). Thus, I can’t be sure if the 16 bells is 1Je(劑), which Jeonghyeon(鄭玄) translated with 『Jurye』(周禮) on the basis of Han(漢) Dynasty music system. Also, there is no sentence like that in scriptures. Therefore, Dasan(茶山) suggested a sentence, ‘Music instrument makes 12Yul as its custom, and 12Seong(十二聲) as its standard’ from 『Jurye』(周禮) 「Jeondongjik」 (典同職). And he doubted if we should believe and iconize Jeonghyeon’s annotation without considering any sentences in scriptures which could be significant grounds. Finally, he expressed the legitimacy of Pyeonjong(編鐘) which is made of 12 bells.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
2. 정다산이 밝히는 4청성의 실체
3. 4청성은 5성의 청성으로, 12율의 청성이 아님에 대하여
4. 결론
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[허연의 인문학산책 ⑤] 조선의 르네상스인 정약용
매경럭스맨
2019 .06
-
Middle latency response in stuttering : A case study
한국언어치료학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .12
-
다산 정약용의 스폰서와 친족들 : 관념과 관행
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2016 .12
-
정약용의 평화사상
통일과 평화
2017 .06
-
정약용의 출판사상에 관한 연구
한국출판학연구
2022 .12
-
다산 정약용의 목민심서(牧民心書)에서 제시된 정책분석과 평가
학술대회 발표논문집
2015 .12
-
『檀几叢書』와 명말청초 문학경향
동북아 문화연구
2017 .06
-
韓中 승려 시인 淸虛와 函可의 시가 비교연구
중국학보
2016 .11
-
｢규장각도(奎章閣圖)｣에 나타난 창덕궁 부용정 일원의 원형경관 연구
휴양및경관연구
2023 .03
-
식민지 ‘수도’의 위상을 둘러싼 동상이몽의 연대기 : 일제하 경성부윤의 지위와 경성부 행정 체계의 변화를 중심으로
서울학연구
2017 .02
-
성금연류 가야금산조 조현법 연구 ― 1950년대 음원을 중심으로 ―
호남학
2020 .01
-
성(誠)사상의 한국교육사적 전개와 지적성장
한국교육사학
2017 .12
-
주자의 사서학과 다산 정약용의 비판 : 논어의 인, 대학의 덕, 중용의 천명, 맹자의 심성에 대한 논쟁
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2020 .12
-
Explanatory Diagrams Of Sung Confucianism (Seong-nihak)
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2019 .07
-
｢산당서객전(山堂書客傳)｣을 통해 본 산당(山堂) 최충성(崔忠成)의 자기 인식
호남학
2019 .01
-
광주학생독립운동가 장재성 디지털 아카이브 구축에 관한 연구
한국기록관리학회지
2021 .11
-
기름에 젖은 머리를 턱 비어 던지고 -사회주의, 여성주의, 지역주의, 혁명가 정칠성의 겹서사 연구-
한국문화연구
2019 .01
-
운문사(雲門寺)와 청도팔경(淸道八景)
국토
2016 .09
-
인삼은 어떻게 ‘한국’의 상징이 되었을까
한국문화연구
2023 .06
-
청도읍성(淸道邑城)과 석빙고(石氷庫)
국토
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
풍수지리적 요인이 부동산 구매 선호도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 서울시 용산구 한남동을 중심으로
강정희
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2017
.06
조선 시대의 『산해경(山海經)』 수용 약론(略論) : 문헌자료를 중심으로
정재서
도교문화연구
2017
.11
Wonders decoded : 직관으로 본 공간의 모습
H. S Suh
한국정신과학회 학술대회논문집
2017
.10
조선 중기 재지사족의 한양정착 과정 연구 : 대구서씨 약봉파와 안동김씨 서윤공파를 중심으로
김규순
한국민족문화
2017
.11
《山海經》象徵結構研究方法考察
李碩九
중국어문학논집
2017
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-910-002008993