메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

The Debate on Xin: Zhuangzi's Argument and Xunzi's Response
Recommendations
Search
Questions

전국시대 후기의 心 논쟁, 장자의 회의와 순자의 대응

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Jeong-Keun Shin (성균관대학교)
Journal
Korean Philosophical Association Korean Journal of Philosophy Vol.129 KCI Excellent Accredited Journal
Published
2016.11
Pages
27 - 48 (22page)
DOI
10.18694/KJP.2016.11.129.27

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
The Debate on Xin: Zhuangzi's Argument and Xunzi's Response
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Early Chinese thinkers attempted to respond to Mencius, since Mencius had understood xin as the basis for human motivations and actions. This paper focuses especially on Zhuangzi’’s understanding of xin and another Confucian thinker Xunzi’’s response to it. Zhuangzi understood the function of xin negatively and thought that the faculty of memory only distorted the facts and disturbed emotions. In contrast, Xunzi tried to show, in the Jiebi解蔽 chapter of the Xunzi, that humans could make fair judgments through the function of xin, and, therefore, xin should not be regarded simply as the source of distorted judgments and emotional excesses.

Contents

요약문
1. 문제 제기
2. 전국시대 후기의 ‘心’ 주제화
3. 장자의 회의
3. 순자의 대응
4. 결론: 장자의 화도(化道)와 순자의 체도(體道)
참고문헌
Abstract

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-105-001891295