지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study focuses on influence, a crucial element of leadership, and intends to investigate ‘standards", one of the valuable influences demanded by highly advanced societies. The standards, the focus of this study, are new order and new values formed as a result of meaningful reforms and revolutions demanded by societies.
This study intends to research and compare leadership as standards and values with the reign and leadership of King Saul and King David. While these two kings faced the same issues of the same times, King Saul stood upon the foundation of traditional customs and values, and King David concentrated on creating new order and values. Their differences will be examined thoroughly. Also, leadership as standards shall be the direction at which the Korean society and its churches aim in order to play a meaningful role as a member of the international community for the 21st century.
§2 will examine the issues of the times, as follows: First, overcoming the crises arising from continuous warfare setting; second, charismatic traditions that threaten royal authority; and third, integration of stratified society. Subsequently, §3 and §4 will examine two Kings" approaches to address these issues. The core task is to combine these three issues as one by integrating the society. For such purposes, one must create integration-driven social standards that can overcome a society"s stratification.
Saul and David found themselves on a common historical foundation. Externally, they had to achieve social integration that bound various members in a nation as one, and, internally, they had to overcome social obstacles, such as kinship, regionalism, gender gap, and racism, and enable social integration in a practical way by establishing democratic and universal values. King David overcame authoritarian values based on outdated and closed world view, and established reasonable and universal values for the new era.
Furthermore, King David had to integrate various nationalities, who were once his enemies, into his nation as its new citizens, and transform a stratified and divided society into an egalitarian structure. In order to do so, universal values, which can be described as wisdom, justice and order, were adopted as the new principles of integration. This new social standards are the true influence of leadership.
This study intends to research and compare leadership as standards and values with the reign and leadership of King Saul and King David. While these two kings faced the same issues of the same times, King Saul stood upon the foundation of traditional customs and values, and King David concentrated on creating new order and values. Their differences will be examined thoroughly. Also, leadership as standards shall be the direction at which the Korean society and its churches aim in order to play a meaningful role as a member of the international community for the 21st century.
§2 will examine the issues of the times, as follows: First, overcoming the crises arising from continuous warfare setting; second, charismatic traditions that threaten royal authority; and third, integration of stratified society. Subsequently, §3 and §4 will examine two Kings" approaches to address these issues. The core task is to combine these three issues as one by integrating the society. For such purposes, one must create integration-driven social standards that can overcome a society"s stratification.
Saul and David found themselves on a common historical foundation. Externally, they had to achieve social integration that bound various members in a nation as one, and, internally, they had to overcome social obstacles, such as kinship, regionalism, gender gap, and racism, and enable social integration in a practical way by establishing democratic and universal values. King David overcame authoritarian values based on outdated and closed world view, and established reasonable and universal values for the new era.
Furthermore, King David had to integrate various nationalities, who were once his enemies, into his nation as its new citizens, and transform a stratified and divided society into an egalitarian structure. In order to do so, universal values, which can be described as wisdom, justice and order, were adopted as the new principles of integration. This new social standards are the true influence of leadership.
목차
I. 문제의 제기
II. 사울과 다윗 시대의 시대적 상황과 시대적 과제
III. 사울의 위기 극복
IV. 다윗의 위기 극복
V. 결론: 다윗의 리더십과 성공 요인
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이새의 아들인가? 사울의 아들인가?: 사울과 다윗의 갈등 내러티브(삼상 16-26장)에서 본 사무엘상 17장 55-58절
구약논단
2023 .03
-
고대 이스라엘의 보편사상과 선교적 확장
미션네트워크
2019 .12
-
사울 왕의 놉 제사장 학살 사건: 심리적 분석
목회와 상담
2017 .01
-
사울과 다윗의 기름부음받음 연구: 1사무 9,1-10,27과 1사무 16,1-13 본문 비교
신학전망
2025 .03
-
사무엘상 13:1의 번역 제안 - 사울의 즉위 나이와 ‘2년’의 역사적 의미 -
성경원문연구
2021 .10
-
‘다윗의 자손’에 관한 다양한 이해 : 구약, 솔로몬의 시편, 쿰란, 마태복음 비교를 중점으로
신학과 사회
2024 .02
-
이스라엘 사회 통합을 위한 다윗의 정치 : 종교적 조처들
구약논단
2017 .12
-
다윗의 다세대 전수과정 탐색: 불안을 중심으로
신학과 사회
2023 .02
-
제왕신탁의 관점으로 본 “다윗의 마지막 말” (사무엘하 23장 1-7절)
구약논단
2018 .03
-
제의 예물로 드린 ‘거룩한 떡’ - 왕만이 요구할 수 있는 특권 :사울 왕이 놉의 제사장들을 학살하다(삼상 21:1-9; 22:6-19)
신학사상
2016 .01
-
전환기 대통령 리더십의 성공조건
유라시아연구
2017 .01
-
아가페(αγαπη) 리더십: 한국교회 리더십 위기상황극복을 위한 기독교적 리더십
복음과 상담
2016 .01
-
대리 왕 제의(代理王祭儀)의 관점으로 본 다윗 왕의 위기 극복 과정
구약논단
2015 .09
-
고전문학 리더십의 재발견과 그 인문학적 가치
韓國古典硏究
2016 .01
-
마소라 본문 사무엘하 7:1-17에 나타난 다윗의 안식과 두 집에 대한 여호와의 약속
성경원문연구
2020 .04
-
영적 리더십 연구
신학지남
2019 .09
-
다윗과 골리앗 이야기 다시 보기 - 개념성(Conceptuality)을 중심으로 -
신학논단
2022 .09
-
아리스토텔레스의 리더십에 관한 연구
동서철학연구
2019 .01
-
기원전 11-10세기 고대 남부 레반트 베냐민과 유다 역사 재구성: 고고학 자료와 문헌 자료 재평가
구약논단
2025 .03
-
Missiological Perspective of Church Leadership: Restoring Missional Leadership
선교신학
2017 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-230-001343698