메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
경찰대학 경찰학연구편집위원회 경찰학연구 경찰학연구 제8권 제1호(통권 제16호)
발행연도
2008.4
수록면
135 - 159 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
With beginning of 21C, North Korea is no longer a prohibited land. South Korean people can go on a trip to Mt. Kŭmgang by their cars or go to work at Gaesong Industrial Complex. Before long, we can see some climbing clubs will upload their special plans of climbing Mt. Paecdu at their personal site in the Internet. As North Korea becomes closer to us, it is possible that N.K’s judicial system can have an direct effect on South citizens, for example when they visit North Korea. In this regards, the necessity of the study on the North Korea criminal investigation structure get increased as much. These kinds of studies have been rare because of the shortage of useful materials and the limit of outer viewpoint. I studied North Korean criminal investigation procedure and structure by reading original books from N.K and interviewing with the escaped people. North Korean criminal investigation system is composed of investigation and preliminary investigation. Investigation is to find crimes and criminals before preliminary investigation and preliminary investigation is to collect evidences. Public prosecutors can indict criminals on basis of those investigations. Especially, prosecutors’ duties and rights in surveillance are checking the law enforcement of investigative unit, preliminary investigation, and trial. When public prosecutors find the violation of law in the way of investigation or preliminary investigation, they can correct it by means of the decision and instruction. The decision means the acceptance or rejection about investigators or preliminary judges’ conclusions. It has the written form and plays a role as the post controlling measure to those conclusions. And also the instruction is almost same with the decision. It is just different from the decision in the point of the participation in (preliminary) investigation. In conclusion, (preliminary)investigation of N.K is independent function. Public prosecutor cannot command (preliminary)investigators and must guarantee their independent actions at law. Also (preliminary)investigators can protest against prosecutor’s decision and instruction. This point is very suggestive to us preparing the period of union of the Korean Peninsula.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001374109