지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to review the case on the securities, collectively called “ARS” or “Long-short ELB” (“ARS”). ARS is a security with Underlying as an index based on the return of issuer’s investment portfolio from ARS investor’s money management. Notable features of new type of financial product are; (i) the investment portfolio above is determined as per the advice of investment advisory business entity, generally pursuing a long-short strategy in the stock market. (ii) Substantially, the investor, not the issuer, takes the investment portfolio’s return, except for some commissions paid to the issuer. (iii) All of the ARS issued in the market have a payoff which the return at maturity shall be on or above the invested principal. In other words, investors do not take any risk of loss, due to the payoff.
Underlying (the index) and predetermined payoff of the ARS is causative of being regulated as a Derivatives-combined security of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act (“the Capital Market Act”). However, the ARS is differentiated from general Derivatives-combined security in the financial market as followings: First, considering its economic substance, its risk and function is thought to be of the asset management businesses service, not security issuance of the Investment trading business. Any Derivatives-combined security investors’ return depends on the level of underlying and pre-determined pay-off, irrespective of the issuer’s investment performance. ARS also has Underlying and payoff, but their combination means the issuer’s performance shall be contributed to the investor in substantial. The issuer of the ARS collects commission or fee without market risk, except any extraordinary market events. Second, consequently, compared to the general Derivatives-combined security, the ARS shall contains agency problem as its specific risk, which arises from the conflict of interest between issuer as a manager of the investor’s money and investor as a beneficiary of the management.
Financial products or services should be legally positioned to be regulated by appropriate rules considering its function and risk in the view of the purpose of the Capital Market Act (protection of investors and integrity of the market). Therefore, to clarify the ARS’s legal position in the Capital Market Act, it is required to look into the function and risk of the ARS at first. Subsequently, we can find a correct position of the ARS, in the light of regulatory purpose, comparing to the regulations on the issuing of the Derivatives-combined security and on the Asset Management Business. Considering its function and risk above, it may be thought that issuing of the ARS should be regulated as a service of the Collective investment business or Discretionary investment business (“Asset Management Business”).
As mentioned at the above, the ARS are issued as a Derivatives-combined security and regulated as a product of Investment trading business entity. However, the regulations for the Asset Management Business are thought to be more appropriate and corresponded to its function and risk. The definition of Derivatives-combined security in the Capital Market Act can be accused to cause such confusion: it is significantly inclusive so that all type of financial products and services can find a way to avoid any regulations set for its original legal form using this security. To resolve such issue, first, the definition of Underlying in the Capital Market Act should be closely reviewed, since it is critical to determine the scope of Derivatives-combined security. Second, it should be reconsidered whether additional conditions are required for the Derivatives-combined security. Though it is not explicitly stipulated in the Capital Market Act, additional condition can be drown from the relationship with other kind of securities, and also required to make clear and reasonable boundary of the Derivatives-combined security from other financial products and services.
It may be arguable weather the ARS is a vehicle to avoid the regulations for the Asset Management Business or a good case of financial innovation by convergence between different kinds of products and service. Regardless of conclusion, what should be noted is that the first step for regulating new financial products should not be the precise understanding of only its present form but also substantial function and risk.
Underlying (the index) and predetermined payoff of the ARS is causative of being regulated as a Derivatives-combined security of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act (“the Capital Market Act”). However, the ARS is differentiated from general Derivatives-combined security in the financial market as followings: First, considering its economic substance, its risk and function is thought to be of the asset management businesses service, not security issuance of the Investment trading business. Any Derivatives-combined security investors’ return depends on the level of underlying and pre-determined pay-off, irrespective of the issuer’s investment performance. ARS also has Underlying and payoff, but their combination means the issuer’s performance shall be contributed to the investor in substantial. The issuer of the ARS collects commission or fee without market risk, except any extraordinary market events. Second, consequently, compared to the general Derivatives-combined security, the ARS shall contains agency problem as its specific risk, which arises from the conflict of interest between issuer as a manager of the investor’s money and investor as a beneficiary of the management.
Financial products or services should be legally positioned to be regulated by appropriate rules considering its function and risk in the view of the purpose of the Capital Market Act (protection of investors and integrity of the market). Therefore, to clarify the ARS’s legal position in the Capital Market Act, it is required to look into the function and risk of the ARS at first. Subsequently, we can find a correct position of the ARS, in the light of regulatory purpose, comparing to the regulations on the issuing of the Derivatives-combined security and on the Asset Management Business. Considering its function and risk above, it may be thought that issuing of the ARS should be regulated as a service of the Collective investment business or Discretionary investment business (“Asset Management Business”).
As mentioned at the above, the ARS are issued as a Derivatives-combined security and regulated as a product of Investment trading business entity. However, the regulations for the Asset Management Business are thought to be more appropriate and corresponded to its function and risk. The definition of Derivatives-combined security in the Capital Market Act can be accused to cause such confusion: it is significantly inclusive so that all type of financial products and services can find a way to avoid any regulations set for its original legal form using this security. To resolve such issue, first, the definition of Underlying in the Capital Market Act should be closely reviewed, since it is critical to determine the scope of Derivatives-combined security. Second, it should be reconsidered whether additional conditions are required for the Derivatives-combined security. Though it is not explicitly stipulated in the Capital Market Act, additional condition can be drown from the relationship with other kind of securities, and also required to make clear and reasonable boundary of the Derivatives-combined security from other financial products and services.
It may be arguable weather the ARS is a vehicle to avoid the regulations for the Asset Management Business or a good case of financial innovation by convergence between different kinds of products and service. Regardless of conclusion, what should be noted is that the first step for regulating new financial products should not be the precise understanding of only its present form but also substantial function and risk.
목차
【초록】
Ⅰ. 서론 : 신상품의 등장과 규제 적용
Ⅱ. 운용성과지수 기초 증권의 개요
Ⅲ. 운용성과지수 기초 증권의 규제 현황
Ⅳ. 운용성과지수 기초 증권의 파생결합증권 해당 여부
Ⅴ. 운용성과지수 기초 증권의 위험과 규제
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (3)
-
대법원 2016. 3. 10. 선고 2013다7264 판결
자세히 보기 -
대법원 2015. 3. 26. 선고 2014다214588(본소), 2014다214595(반소) 판결
자세히 보기 -
대법원 2015. 5. 14. 선고 2013다2757 판결
[1] 민법 제2조, 제150조 제1항, 구 증권거래법(2007. 8. 3. 법률 제8635호 자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 부칙 제2조로 폐지) 제52조 제3호, 구 증권거래법 시행령(2008. 7. 29. 대통령령 제20947호 자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 시행령 부칙 제2조로 폐지) 제36조의3 등의 규정 취지에 비추어 보면, 증권회사는 유가
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국어판 ADHD 평정척도-Ⅳ(K-ARS-Ⅳ)의 현황과 개선방안
정서·행동장애연구
2015 .01
-
Recent Developments in the Research on Derivatives Securities in Korea
재무연구
2022 .08
-
개인투자자의 파생상품, 파생결합증권 투자행태 분석
Financial Planning Review
2017 .02
-
파생상품 규제에 관한 고찰
법과 정책연구
2016 .01
-
Examining Online to Offline Service Using Augmented Reality : Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective
한국호텔외식경영학회 학술발표논문집
2015 .06
-
기업의 정보보안 투자에 시장이 어떻게 반응하는지에 대한 탐색적 연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2018 .01
-
장기투자자산으로써 파생상품의 경제적 가치-주가연계증권*
선물연구
2019 .01
-
Impact Factors Analysis on AR Shopping Service’s Immersion
유통과학연구
2019 .01
-
기업의 정보보호 공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향
지식경영연구
2019 .01
-
2015년 자본시장법 주요 판례의 분석과 평가
상사판례연구
2016 .01
-
유통산업에서 증강현실(AR)과 가상현실(VR)의 흐름과 확산에 관한 연구: 주요 성공사례를 중심으로
유통경영학회지
2017 .10
-
AR 전시가 소비자의 구매 의사 결정에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
인문사회 21
2023 .06
-
韩国资本市场法集合投资制度对中国的借鉴意义
중국법연구
2016 .01
-
서비스 디자인 기반 증강현실(AR) 학습 콘텐츠 개발 연구
교육정보미디어연구
2019 .01
-
VR과 AR의 교육적 활용에 대한 초등교사의 사용의도 분석
미래교육연구
2018 .01
-
AR체험을 활용한 관광지의 선택속성, 혜택, 가치 간의 관계분석: 중국인 잠재관광객을 대상으로
관광레저연구
2022 .04
-
생명보험회사의 재무적 특성과 파생상품 활용
기업경영연구
2017 .01
-
스마트관광도시의 AR 만족도와 지불의사 향상을 위한 AR 경험 디자인에 대한 연구 -바르셀로나 까사바뜨요를 중심으로-
관광학연구
2021 .01
-
Potential Risks due to Expansion in Financial Investment Product Market
[BOK] Financial Stability Report
2015 .08
-
Young Foreign Language Learners’ Engagement and Motivation in Augmented Reality-based Vocabulary Learning
멀티미디어 언어교육
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-327-002818230