메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대소설학회 현대소설연구 현대소설연구 제17호
발행연도
2002.12
수록면
183 - 205 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Until now the literary works which were produced in the first half of 1940`s has been called as the Chin-il Munhak(the pro-Japanese Literature) or the Am-huk-ki Munhak(the Literature in the darkness age). Because these literary works were written in Japanese and have the themes that take side with the policy of Japanese Emperialism on the whole. But if we rethink those literary works on the position beyond the nation-state and national literature, we can come to the different conclusion and the different definition. This term does not position those literary works on the outside of the nation-state and the national literature, but locates it on the relationship between the colonizer and colonized subject. By Homi Bhabha the relationship is ambivalent because the colonized subject is never simply and completely opposed to the colonizer and colonizer also never wants colonial subjects to be exact replicas of themselves too. Although the Japanese colonizers adapted the policy of assimilation, they never wanted colonial subjects to be exact replicas of themselves. Both of the complete assimilation and the complete heterogeneity were a threat for them. We can see the example of the former in the Kubota Yukio`s novel. From the Rural Society, and the latter in the Miyazaki Seitaro`s novel, His Elder Brother. In order to escape from a threat of ambivalence, they reconstruct the image of the colonized subjects in their own way. We can explain this ambivalence not only in the unconscious aspect, but also in the historical aspect. According to Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, this age was the shift point from the age of the Imperialism to that of the Imperial. The Imperialism is the product of the Modernity and the Nationalism, and only expansion of the Nationalism. But the Imperial is the product of the Post-Modernity and the Post-Nationalism, and contrary to the Imperialism it has no center. Japanese Dae-Dong-A-Kong-Young-Kwan(Dai-To-A-Kyo-Ei-Ken, The Great Co-prospecrity Alliance of Asia) has two faces of the Imperialism and the Imperial. It has center and in contemporary has no center, It has both policy of the assimilation and the discrimination.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-810-000974382