메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대소설학회 현대소설연구 현대소설연구 제15호
발행연도
2001.12
수록면
399 - 424 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The two main reasons why I compared <Daybreak of the Dawn> and <Luo-tuo-xiang-zi> is because one, due to its similar era of being written, and two, the two having a similar philosophy about the world between each other. These two books are similar in showing the real past expressing realism. Both authors use real history and they create art and the danger of a nation. The first main similarity that I found between the two books is that the two authors both are the first ones to accept the western ideas early, but interestingly enough, they both uses the beauty of Eastern literature without any hesitation and difficulty, getting the two pieces to stand out more. As the world is becoming smaller and smaller, opinions about all literatures being universalized is rising, comparing the two pieces of literature of two close countries geographically has a very great and important meaning. The two major motives that are behind these two stories are; one, expressing the lives of the common people during the two stories takes place. The main focuses of the two are the harsh lives of the people when another country is taking over their own country that they are living in. The second motive of the two stories is the variety of their literary means. The works are Gu Yin Hwan can be divided into three big parts. One is writing about our people in history under attack in war, two, the hope of the people worrying about the future of their own country even though they are under the rule of Japan, and three, how the people is eagerly wanting and requiring the perfect life in their normal lives. The works of Lao She can be divided into two parts; one with a strong sense of society, and two, the beauty of literature all by itself. The third motive is that the two stories both take place in the same era, time period. They both are saying how the people struggled being poor trying to develop under the control of the Japanese. Despite the similarities in the motives, there are differences in the way of life and the fate of people in the two stories. The reasons of this differences is because one, the way of explaining/expressing the characters and the ideal of the authors are not the same. In Gu`s story, the characters that set up the plot of the story is mostly made up with well-educated high class people, worrying about the future of their country and people. In Laos story however, the characters are made up of people that are have no wealth, and they are not able to get out of their poor condition due to the influence in their environment. The second difference is the difference in the ideas and the way it is expressed. In Gus story, the author talks about the possible ideals, but Lao only shows the poor and inescapable tragic reality. The Korean author also does show the lives of farmers, but it mainly talks about the pathway of hope to the open world. The Chinese author however, only shows the hard lives of the poor men and that is the only thing that is dealt in the story. Third difference of the two stories is the two different philosophies of the two writers. Lao in the other hand is only realistic. The main and only focus of Laos writing is to show how it is not possible for the poor to get out of there harsh conditions due to the conflicting society, and it deals with the agony of the poor to get a way to win their individual rights. The final difference between the two pieces is that the two literary works carefully and profoundly criticizes different things. Gu In Hwan suggests that the attack and the rule of the Japanese over the Koreans is the reason that brought the separation of families and lovers and the harsh and poor life of the common people. Different from this, Lao ironically criticizes the rudeness of capitalists, and it deals with the problem of individualism. These differences stated above is brought by the different world philosophy of the two authors, and the historical and cultural difference that they have within them.
#낙원의식 #동질성 #비교문학 #사회의식 #이질성

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

『낙타상자』와 『운수 좋은 날』비교
유재성 중국과 중국학 2011 .08
자전적 서사의 서술기법과 공감의 문제 : 박완서 「엄마의 말뚝1」과 황순원 「곡예사」를 중심으로
강유정 현대소설연구 2017 .09
소설과 미디어 환경에 관한 연구 : 비문자 매체(nontext-media)의 소설적 형상화와 기법적 수용의 문제
김정남 현대소설연구 2006 .12
역사추리소설의 장르적 성격과 한국적인 특수성
박진 현대소설연구 2006 .12
라캉의 정신분석 담론을 통해본 황석영의 <손님>론
이봉일 현대소설연구 2006 .12

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-810-000973916