메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제40권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
173 - 195 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper addresses the different meanings of double object constructions. Verbs of <giving> take X and H as its objects to constitute {A v<giving> H X} meaning “A transfer X to H,” while verbs of <taking-away> constitute {A v<taking-away> H X} meaning “A transfer X from H.” Non <giving> verbs in DOCs are classified into four different semantic categories; <<sending>giving> verbs, <<preparing>giving> verbs, <<getting>giving> verbs, and <<producing>giving> verbs. Non <taking -away> verbs in DOCs are grouped into two different categories; <taking-away<getting>> and <taking-away<losing>> verbs. Write, a <producing> verb or <sending> verb in monotransitive constructions, takes X and H as its objects to constitute either {A v<<sending>giving> H X} as in He wrote her a poem or {A v<<producing>giving> H X} as in He wrote her a letter, exemplifying lexical ambiguity. A <getting> verb, steal takes X and H as its objects to constitute either {A v<<getting>giving> H X} as in Steal me a mink for my birthday or {A v<taking-away<getting>> H X} as in He stole me a mink for his wife’s birthday, exemplifying structural ambiguity.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0