메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Hae-Young Choi (Chonnam National University)
저널정보
한국서양고전학회 서양고전학연구 서양고전학연구 제54권 제3호
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
41 - 49 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Euripides’ play Cyclops is the only complete satyr play that exists. In the past, Cyclops was not one of Euripides’ most analyzed plays; however, scholars have recently starting paying more attention to it. One result of this has been renewed interest in the controversy surrounding its age. Sutton argued that Cyclops was written in 424 BC, Ussher, in 412 BC and Seaford proposed that Cyclops was written after 412 BC, and most likely produced in 408 BC. But all arguments are based on reasoning and not hard evidence. The difficulties of dating Cyclops are, therefore, unresolved.
In this paper, I argue that Cyclops must have been performed before the Sicilian Expedition turned into a disaster for the Athenians. My argument is mainly based on two new sets observations: the descriptions of the role of Poseidon and Helen in the play. In my opinion, Cyclops was produced around the time of an intense discussion of the Sicilian Expedition, but before its failure –which means that the play was produced no earlier than 416 and no later than 413. Euripides tried to dissuade the Athenians from embarking on the expedition by emphasizing the remoteness and the possibility of danger in Sicily through the metaphor of the monster Cyclops, and by warning against the maritime empire of Athens through the metaphor of Poseidon, the god of the Sea.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Poseidon
3. Helen
4. Conclusion
Bibliography
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-800-002216658