메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
洪郁喜 (國立臺灣師範大學)
저널정보
동서미술문화학회 미술문화연구 미술문화연구 제6호
발행연도
2015.6
수록면
189 - 206 (18page)
DOI
10.18707/jacs.2015.06.6.189

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
History is a huge irregular-shaped collective; there were always a blind spot. We can only see part of the historical information, but couldn’t analyze the details via a single historical perspective. Historical evidence only exist at the time, doesn’t apply to any other time or space. When we use our intuition to explain what we see from historical evidence, it’s easy to fall into the quagmire of misreading. However, reconstruct broken history has become a situation couldn’t be avoided; also, misreading become a potentially inevitable incidence. Misreading in Literary Criticism of Deconstruction can be divided into “reading misunderstanding” and “misreading creation”. From the study of Cognitive Psychology, they divided misread into “arrangement of the wrong sequences”, “subjective bias” and “error-induced”. According to theories of Deconstruction and Cognitive Psychology, one’s based on experienced ink wash painting technique combine with new technology devices, use the quasi-imitation historical data to highlighting the evidence is in a situation of undoubtedly but uncertainly. Started from the rupture of a conventional image, juxtaposed the modern image then transformed. One’s attempts to reflect modern interpretation of vague state through art; also hope that when viewers are enjoying the work, can remind them that we encountered with many misreading situations in our life.

목차

중문초록
Ⅰ. 前言
Ⅱ. 名詞解釋與界定
Ⅲ. 以認知學淺析誤讀型態
Ⅳ. 應用誤讀?生的藝術模式
Ⅴ. 結論
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0