지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With a reflection on the grand quantitative analysis in previous historical investigations, microhistory came into being in Italy in the 1960s and the 70s. Microhistory is, in principle, the intensive historical investigation of a relatively well defined smaller object. Notwithstanding, it still has the ambition to draw a larger picture of the history. Microhistory is also characterized by its preference to the exceptional individuals or phenomena, its “narrative” style and the delicate way it deals with historical sources. Essentially, microhistory endeavors to bring the individual’s role, the concrete life as well as the diversity and complexity of history to the historical writing.
At first, microhistory did not have intersection with the medical history. Nevertheless, the history of medicine echoes microhistory in bringing the concrete and vivid life beings to history. Mainly due to this similarity, historical surveys on medicine from the perspective of microhistory are increasing and gradually develop into a remarkable trend in the international historical academy from the 1980s onwards.
As the microhistory is rising and its influence is expanding, the microhistorical approach has been practiced to a certain extent in the historical writings on medicine in China. Concentrating on an individual person, a single event, a particular drug or a specific concept, there already have some studies conduct intensive historical investigation on a small scale. A small part of these researches, for example, those of Chang Che-Chia, Li Shang-jen and etc. could be regarded as perfect examples of microhistory. However, no relevant research is carried out explicitly under the heading of microhistory, instead, they are the offspring of the “new history”. Besides, most of these researches could not be regarded as real microhistories, strictly speaking. They do not practice microhistory consciously and they have a long way to go to improve the delicacy of the analysis, to reinforce the narrative style and to grasp the social context of the individual or the event (the link between micro and macro levels). Nevertheless, these studies anyway indicate the invisible influence of microhistory and have paved a way for the future microhistorical investigations on medicine. We believe that microhistory is an undercurrent about to emerge in the field of Chinese medical history. It is the right time to advocate and promote the self-conscious microhistorical investigation, promptly and strongly, while updating the ideas and methods of it to make it a dominant trend rather than an undercurrent in the studies of Chinese medical history. Its rise would not only display the value and significance of microhistory in a better way, but also would help medical history to realize its core idea of history of life, therefore to propel our inquiry into Chinese medical history.
At first, microhistory did not have intersection with the medical history. Nevertheless, the history of medicine echoes microhistory in bringing the concrete and vivid life beings to history. Mainly due to this similarity, historical surveys on medicine from the perspective of microhistory are increasing and gradually develop into a remarkable trend in the international historical academy from the 1980s onwards.
As the microhistory is rising and its influence is expanding, the microhistorical approach has been practiced to a certain extent in the historical writings on medicine in China. Concentrating on an individual person, a single event, a particular drug or a specific concept, there already have some studies conduct intensive historical investigation on a small scale. A small part of these researches, for example, those of Chang Che-Chia, Li Shang-jen and etc. could be regarded as perfect examples of microhistory. However, no relevant research is carried out explicitly under the heading of microhistory, instead, they are the offspring of the “new history”. Besides, most of these researches could not be regarded as real microhistories, strictly speaking. They do not practice microhistory consciously and they have a long way to go to improve the delicacy of the analysis, to reinforce the narrative style and to grasp the social context of the individual or the event (the link between micro and macro levels). Nevertheless, these studies anyway indicate the invisible influence of microhistory and have paved a way for the future microhistorical investigations on medicine. We believe that microhistory is an undercurrent about to emerge in the field of Chinese medical history. It is the right time to advocate and promote the self-conscious microhistorical investigation, promptly and strongly, while updating the ideas and methods of it to make it a dominant trend rather than an undercurrent in the studies of Chinese medical history. Its rise would not only display the value and significance of microhistory in a better way, but also would help medical history to realize its core idea of history of life, therefore to propel our inquiry into Chinese medical history.
목차
1. What is Microhistory
2. Microhistory and the History of Medicine
3. Microhistorical Studies in Chinese Medical History
4. Conclusion : Prospects and Solutions
REFERENCES
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이탈리아 미시사에서 지구적 미시사로 : 미시사의 전통과 변형
동아문화
2023 .06
-
미시사연구의 이론과 동향 : 의사학의 시각
의사학
2015 .08
-
포스트모던 미시사: 줄리안 반스와 김연수의 역사 쓰기
영미문화
2016 .01
-
반즈의 『끝남의 의미』 : ‘사회 없는’ 개인의 나르시시즘적 서사와 역사적 책임의 불안한 결합
외국문학연구
2018 .02
-
미시사 연구의 방법과 실제 : 이문건의 유의일기(儒醫日記)
의사학
2015 .08
-
공공역사 논의의 한국적 맥락과 공공역사가들
역사비평
2021 .08
-
역사교육과 역사학의 거리
역사교육
2016 .06
-
한국 공공역사 연구의 가능성과 지향
역사비평
2024 .08
-
학습내용구성 관점에서 본 최근 역사교육의 민주시민교육논의 : 대안적 구성 방향의 모색
역사교육논집
2018 .01
-
중 · 고 역사 교육과정의 중국사 학습 요소 체계화 모색
역사교육
2020 .03
-
역사교육 내용선정 기준 -‘의미 있는 역사’의 개념 탐색-
역사교육논집
2021 .01
-
고등학교 세계사 교과서의 중국고중세사 서술 : 역사 용어를 중심으로
역사교육
2017 .06
-
2015 초등 역사 교육과정에 대한 교사의 인식과 학생의 역사 이해
역사교육논집
2020 .01
-
시민을 위한 역사교육으로서 독일의 공공역사(Public history)
역사교육논집
2018 .01
-
서양의학사 연구동향과 전망, 2011~2020: 연구주제의 확장과 새로운 방법론의 모색
의사학
2020 .12
-
학생들이 알고 있는 역사의 특징
역사교육논집
2018 .01
-
세계사 교과서 현대사 단원의 학생 활동 분석
역사교육
2020 .06
-
‘발전’을 문제 삼기 ―‘발전사(History of Development)’ 연구의 전개와 동향
역사비평
2021 .02
-
공공역사가로서의 역사교사를 말하다
역사비평
2022 .05
-
우밍이(吳明益)의『도둑맞은 자전거(單車失竊記)』와 타이완 역사 재구성
한중언어문화연구
2024 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-510-001839323