지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Park Jeong-hi came to power by a Coup, and tried to legitimatize his own power with the slogan of “Promotion of National Culture.” Apparently, his intention was to earn a justified place in the history of Koreans. Park Jeong-hi regime proceeded with a series of excavation of archaeologically important places while promoting historical figures with significance, and by doing so seized the initiative in National culture development projects. It seems Park Jeong-hi regime’s policy was never simply trying to change or distort historical facts and traditions. So, criticism and evaluation should both be applied in the examination of this era.
National history textbooks began to be ‘designated’ by the government in the Yushin Regime, and such fact shows us the goal of the Park Jeong-hi regime and its policy concerning national culture. The launch of the “Government designation” system was led by forces whose intention was to glamorize or at least justify pro-Japanese actions in the past and brutal dictatorship in the present. It was indeed a Fascist approach, as it intended to control the people’s memories. It also intended to create citizens who would identify themselves within the power structure of the state, and obey orders from it. Considering all that, we could say the transfer from the “Government qualification” system to the “Government designation” system was a very anti-historic action, and also a choice that went against democracy itself. It was also an unconstitutional policy direction, as such turn bore the potential of violating the independent and professional nature of education and even disrupt the principle of political neutrality in schools, in a very ‘uninstructive’ matter. And the change in policy was also very much insensitive to the fact that historical evaluation could differ by the viewer’s interpretation of historical events, and not to mention the historian’s own point of view.
The society of historians, however, would also have to contemplate upon the issue of modernity, upon which the Park Jeong-hi regime’s national culture policy was established. The historical society in Korea has always recognized the European model of modern historical studies as the only model to pursue, and Korean historians tended to identify themselves within such boundaries. In order to develop a more solid logic to criticize governmental policies and the government’s ongoing pursuit to employ various forms of “government-designated” textbook systems again, the idea and nature of “modern historical studies” should be dissected and reassembled with a fresh perspective.
National history textbooks began to be ‘designated’ by the government in the Yushin Regime, and such fact shows us the goal of the Park Jeong-hi regime and its policy concerning national culture. The launch of the “Government designation” system was led by forces whose intention was to glamorize or at least justify pro-Japanese actions in the past and brutal dictatorship in the present. It was indeed a Fascist approach, as it intended to control the people’s memories. It also intended to create citizens who would identify themselves within the power structure of the state, and obey orders from it. Considering all that, we could say the transfer from the “Government qualification” system to the “Government designation” system was a very anti-historic action, and also a choice that went against democracy itself. It was also an unconstitutional policy direction, as such turn bore the potential of violating the independent and professional nature of education and even disrupt the principle of political neutrality in schools, in a very ‘uninstructive’ matter. And the change in policy was also very much insensitive to the fact that historical evaluation could differ by the viewer’s interpretation of historical events, and not to mention the historian’s own point of view.
The society of historians, however, would also have to contemplate upon the issue of modernity, upon which the Park Jeong-hi regime’s national culture policy was established. The historical society in Korea has always recognized the European model of modern historical studies as the only model to pursue, and Korean historians tended to identify themselves within such boundaries. In order to develop a more solid logic to criticize governmental policies and the government’s ongoing pursuit to employ various forms of “government-designated” textbook systems again, the idea and nature of “modern historical studies” should be dissected and reassembled with a fresh perspective.
목차
머리말 : 비판의 방향
1. 전유(專有) : 정책과 국사의 이중주
2. 동조(同調) : 수용과 내면화
3. 비판(批判) : 비껴간 근대주의
맺음말 : 역사의 반복
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제3차 국사과 교육과정의 성립과 국사교과서 개편
역사와교육
2018 .01
-
역사 텍스트 독해를 둘러싼 동향과 쟁점
역사교육
2017 .06
-
국정 ‘국사’ 교과서 서술 방향의 문제점과 ‘민주주의’ 교육 원칙의 왜곡
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
제3차 교육과정기 고등학교 『국사』 국정교과서의 한국 근⋅현대사 서술과 그 특징
역사와교육
2018 .01
-
역사교육과 역사학의 거리
역사교육
2016 .06
-
제2차 교육과정기 고등학교 국사교과서의 발행과 서술 변화
역사와교육
2017 .01
-
세계사 교과서 현대사 단원의 학생 활동 분석
역사교육
2020 .06
-
역사 교육과정 개선을 위한 대안 서사 모색 및 핵심개념 도출의 필요성
역사비평
2021 .11
-
1950~1960년대 독재 권력의 삼별초항쟁(三別抄抗爭)인식과 서술 : 검정 국사 교과서의 서술을 중심으로
역사와현실
2015 .06
-
북한 체제 성립기 역사교과서의 문화 서술 체계 -『조선통사(상)』을 중심으로-
백산학보
2021 .01
-
핵심역량 중심의 역사교육과 역사교과서 개발
역사와실학
2018 .11
-
중등 “역사”ㆍ고등 “한국사” 교과서 국정화에 대한 반론
역사와실학
2015 .11
-
교과서의 고려시기 학습내용 서술체계·요소 분석과 체계화
역사교육
2018 .09
-
고등학교 ‘한국사’ 교과서 사료 활용 방식의 특징과 문제점
역사교육
2015 .12
-
공공역사 논의의 한국적 맥락과 공공역사가들
역사비평
2021 .08
-
역사교육의 정치적 성격과 다양성 논의
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
공공역사가로서의 역사교사를 말하다
역사비평
2022 .05
-
역사전쟁을 성찰하며 - 정사(正史) · 정통성(正統性)론의 함정
역사비평
2019 .08
-
역사과 국가교육과정 내용구성 쟁점의 비판적 검토
역사교육논집
2021 .01
-
최근 한국 보수정부의 역사교육정책과 국가주의 역사교육
역사교육논집
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001610525