지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.3
- 수록면
- 30 - 37 (8page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives：The purpose of this study was to verify the validity and clinical cutoff score of the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 1.5-5 (CBCL 1.5-5) for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Methods：44 ASD infants and 100 normal infants participated. T-test, discriminant analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and odds ratio analysis were performed on the data.
Results：Discriminant validity was confirmed by mean differences and discriminant analysis on the subscales of Withdrawn, Attention problems, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, and all Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-oriented scales between the two groups. ROC curve analysis showed that Withdrawn, Attention problems, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, DSM pervasive developmental problems, DSM attention deficit/hyperactivity problems, and DSM oppositional defiant problems significantly predicted ASD infants compared to normal infants. In addition, the clinical cutoff score criteria adopted in the Korean CBCL 1.5-5 for subscales of Withdrawn, Attention problems, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, DSM pervasive developmental problems, DSM attention deficit/hyperactivity problems, and DSM oppositional defiant problems were shown to be valid.
Conclusion：The subscales of Withdrawn, Attention problems, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, DSM pervasive developmental problems, DSM attention deficit/hyperactivity problems, and DSM oppositional defiant problems significantly discriminated for the diagnosis of ASD.
Methods：44 ASD infants and 100 normal infants participated. T-test, discriminant analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and odds ratio analysis were performed on the data.
Results：Discriminant validity was confirmed by mean differences and discriminant analysis on the subscales of Withdrawn, Attention problems, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, and all Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-oriented scales between the two groups. ROC curve analysis showed that Withdrawn, Attention problems, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, DSM pervasive developmental problems, DSM attention deficit/hyperactivity problems, and DSM oppositional defiant problems significantly predicted ASD infants compared to normal infants. In addition, the clinical cutoff score criteria adopted in the Korean CBCL 1.5-5 for subscales of Withdrawn, Attention problems, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, DSM pervasive developmental problems, DSM attention deficit/hyperactivity problems, and DSM oppositional defiant problems were shown to be valid.
Conclusion：The subscales of Withdrawn, Attention problems, Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, Total problems, DSM pervasive developmental problems, DSM attention deficit/hyperactivity problems, and DSM oppositional defiant problems significantly discriminated for the diagnosis of ASD.
목차
서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
References
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - American Psychiatric Association / 2013 / Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 / American Psychiatric Association
2. [단행본] - American Psychiatric Association / 2000 / Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR / American Psychiatric Association
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Pinborough-Zimmerman J / 2012 / Changes in the administrative prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: contribution of special education and health from 2002-2008 / J Autism Dev Disord 42 : 521 ~ 530
4. [단행본] - Achenbach TM / 2000 / Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles / University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Pandolfi V / 2009 / Confirmatory factor analysis of the child behavior checklist 1.5-5 in a sample of children with autism spectrum disorders / J Autism Dev Disord 39 : 986 ~ 995
2. [단행본] - American Psychiatric Association / 2000 / Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR / American Psychiatric Association
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Pinborough-Zimmerman J / 2012 / Changes in the administrative prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: contribution of special education and health from 2002-2008 / J Autism Dev Disord 42 : 521 ~ 530
4. [단행본] - Achenbach TM / 2000 / Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles / University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Pandolfi V / 2009 / Confirmatory factor analysis of the child behavior checklist 1.5-5 in a sample of children with autism spectrum disorders / J Autism Dev Disord 39 : 986 ~ 995
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Validation Study of the Korean Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Non-Autism Spectrum Disorder
소아청소년정신의학
2019 .01
-
자폐스펙트럼장애와 발달지체의 변별진단에서CBCL 1.5-5 DSM 전반적 발달문제 척도의 유용성
한국놀이치료학회지
2015 .01
-
Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 Compared to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV
소아청소년정신의학
2018 .10
-
DSM-5 변경 그 이후의 흐름: ASD & Social Communication Disorder
대한소아청소년정신의학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .05
-
Recent update of autism spectrum disorders
Korean journal of pediatrics
2015 .01
-
정신질환의 진단 및 통계 편람(DSM) 조현병 진단 개념의 변천: 1980년에서 2013년까지
신경정신의학
2021 .11
-
정신장애 영유아의 언어발달수준과 문제행동의 관계: 성별, 연령별, 언어지연과 정상 집단 간 문제행동의 차이
한국놀이치료학회지
2016 .01
-
한국판 DSM-5 섭식장애진단척도(Korean version of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale DSM-5, K-EDDS DSM-5) : 신뢰도와 타당도 연구
대한불안의학회지
2018 .01
-
Clinical Utility of Impact of Event Scale–Revised for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION
2024 .08
-
자폐스펙트럼장애 영유아의 수면문제 경계선 및 임상 수준 집단과 정상 수준 집단 간 사회성숙도와 문제행동의 차이
재활치료과학
2021 .01
-
Comparing the diagnostic systems for the DSM and ICD
대한소아청소년정신의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .05
-
정신장애 영유아의 CARS 절단점에 따른 진단분포, 발달수준, 사회성숙도 및 자폐증상의 차이
한국놀이치료학회지
2019 .01
-
Development of the IMB Model and an Evidence- Based Diabetes Self-management Mobile Application
Healthcare Informatics Research
2018 .01
-
자폐스펙트럼장애 아동들의 효과적인 조기 중재에 대한 체계적 고찰
재활치료과학
2018 .01
-
공격적 문제행동을 보이는 자폐스펙트럼장애 아동청소년의 임상적 특징 : 예비연구
소아청소년정신의학
2017 .10
-
The Mixed-Features Specifier of Major Depressive Disorder in DSM-5: Is It Practical?
PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION
2018 .01
-
발달지체 영유아에 대한 CBCL 1.5-5 유아행동평가척도-부모용의 요인분석
한국놀이치료학회지
2015 .01
-
Discriminative Effects of Social Skills Training on Facial Emotion Recognition among Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder
소아청소년정신의학
2018 .10
-
ADHD의 K-CBCL 아동ㆍ청소년 행동평가척도 군집분석: 아동복지시설 아동ㆍ청소년 대상으로
한국놀이치료학회지
2020 .01
-
DSM-5의 불안성 디스트레스 세부 진단에 따른 주요우울장애 입원 환자의 약물치료 반응의 차이
대한정신약물학회지
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
발달지체 진단에서 CBCL 1.5-5 유아행동평가척도-부모용의 변별력
하은혜
,
김서윤
,
송동호
외 2명
소아청소년정신의학
2011
.06
‘자폐스펙트럼장애’ 용어의 사용
신석호
소아청소년정신의학
2014
.06
자폐 스펙트럼 장애 청소년에서 주의력결핍 과잉행동장애 유무에 따른 임상적 특성 : 자폐증상, 정서문제, 부모·자녀관계를 중심으로
송재원
,
반건호
,
조인희
외 7명
소아청소년정신의학
2013
.12
자폐 범주성 장애 아동에서 아동ㆍ청소년 행동평가척도의 요인분석
박은영
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2011
.08
부모의 성격 및 자녀의 성격과 자녀의 심리적 적응 간의 관계
이숙희
,
김태호
,
전영순
소아청소년정신의학
2016
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-516-001389722