지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.6
- 수록면
- 120 - 127 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives：The purpose of this study was to verify discriminant validity and the clinical cutoff score of Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 in the diagnosis of developmental delayed infants.
Methods：The participants were screened by Denver II which includes 156 developmental delayed infants and 288 normal infants. Chi-squared test, t-test, ROC curve analysis, odds ratio analysis were performed on the data.
Results：Only 47 items out of 99 items among the CBCL 1.5-5 of total groups, 36 items of boys and 48 items of girls, discriminated developmental delayed infants well. Discriminant validity was confirmed by mean differences on the subscales of Withdrawn, Sleep Problems, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Externalizing Problems, Total Problems, DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems and DSM Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems between the two groups. Additionally, ROC analyses demonstrated that Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems significantly predicted developmental delayed infants compared to normal infants. Also, the clinical cutoff score criteria adopted in the Korean CBCL 1.5-5 for subscales of Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems were shown to be valid.
Conclusion：The subscales of Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalising Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems significantly discriminated in the diagnosis of developmental delayed infants well.
Methods：The participants were screened by Denver II which includes 156 developmental delayed infants and 288 normal infants. Chi-squared test, t-test, ROC curve analysis, odds ratio analysis were performed on the data.
Results：Only 47 items out of 99 items among the CBCL 1.5-5 of total groups, 36 items of boys and 48 items of girls, discriminated developmental delayed infants well. Discriminant validity was confirmed by mean differences on the subscales of Withdrawn, Sleep Problems, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Externalizing Problems, Total Problems, DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems and DSM Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems between the two groups. Additionally, ROC analyses demonstrated that Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems significantly predicted developmental delayed infants compared to normal infants. Also, the clinical cutoff score criteria adopted in the Korean CBCL 1.5-5 for subscales of Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems were shown to be valid.
Conclusion：The subscales of Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalising Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems significantly discriminated in the diagnosis of developmental delayed infants well.
목차
서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
References
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Ha EH / 2010 / Developmental test and Intelligence Test, In Handbook of Psychological Assessment for Child, Adolescent, and Adult / Hana Medical Press
2. [단행본] - Oh KJ / 1997 / Korean version of Child Behavior Checklist (K-CBCL) / ChungAng Aptitude Publishing
3. [단행본] - Achenbach TM / 2000 / Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles / University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families
4. [단행본] - Oh KJ / 2009 / Korean version of the child behavior checklist for ages 1.5-5 / Huno Consulting
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Pandolfi V / 2009 / Confirmatory factor analysis of the child behavior checklist 1.5-5 in a sample of children with autism spectrum disorders / J Autism Developmental Disorders 39 : 986 ~ 995
2. [단행본] - Oh KJ / 1997 / Korean version of Child Behavior Checklist (K-CBCL) / ChungAng Aptitude Publishing
3. [단행본] - Achenbach TM / 2000 / Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles / University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families
4. [단행본] - Oh KJ / 2009 / Korean version of the child behavior checklist for ages 1.5-5 / Huno Consulting
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Pandolfi V / 2009 / Confirmatory factor analysis of the child behavior checklist 1.5-5 in a sample of children with autism spectrum disorders / J Autism Developmental Disorders 39 : 986 ~ 995
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
자폐 범주성 장애 아동에서 아동ㆍ청소년 행동평가척도의 요인분석
박은영
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2011
.08
자폐스펙트럼장애 진단에서 Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 유아 행동평가척도 부모용의 변별력
이선희
,
하은혜
,
송동호
소아청소년정신의학
2015
.03
부모의 성격 및 자녀의 성격과 자녀의 심리적 적응 간의 관계
이숙희
,
김태호
,
전영순
소아청소년정신의학
2016
.03
일 중소도시 소아청소년의 인터넷 및 스마트폰중독 수준에 따른 심리사회적 취약요인의 차이
전영순
,
김태호
,
신용태
외 1명
소아청소년정신의학
2016
.09
지난 10년간 일 대학병원 정신건강의학과 소아청소년 초진환자 분포의 변화
김효진
,
정성원
,
정철호
소아청소년정신의학
2015
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-516-000676137