지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.6
- 수록면
- 1 - 29 (29page)
- DOI
- 10.34122/jip.2007.06.2.1.1
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The role of IPRs in international trade, the global economy and international relations has grown considerably, especially since the 1970s. IP regulation during the 1980s came to be linked to trade policy, this setting the stage for the globalization of IP standards. Competition regulation, at least so far as IP was concerned, began to adopt a hands-off approach. The rationale behind these movements is the exterior influences and pressures coming from governmental and non-governmental actors. In fact, private interest groups are
increasing competing to shape the international IPR in ways that further their economic interests and reflect their sense of fairness. For example, Under the leadership of Pfizer"s CEO backed up by his IBM counterpart, the ACTPN successfully elicited the support of groups such as the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and the Chemical Manufacturers of America, and actively sought to educate congressmen and the USTR officials in the arcane subject of IPRs, and its importances for the United States, and the need for a multilateral solution with GATT as the best available forum. And, IIPA works closely with the U.S. Trade Representative in the annual "Special 301" reviews on whether acts, policies or practices of any foreign country deny adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights or fair and equitable market access for U.S. persons relying on intellectual property protection. Private interest groups do not only collect statistics for IP Infringement, but also endeavor to acquire and protect the IPRs. The acquisition of rights and the efforts to protect the rights include a small army of people to monitor the market, take enforcement action, if necessary, engage law enforcement, lobby government agencies and other steps. In these ways, private interest groups of Korea should expand their powers to reflect their IP in trade policy.
increasing competing to shape the international IPR in ways that further their economic interests and reflect their sense of fairness. For example, Under the leadership of Pfizer"s CEO backed up by his IBM counterpart, the ACTPN successfully elicited the support of groups such as the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and the Chemical Manufacturers of America, and actively sought to educate congressmen and the USTR officials in the arcane subject of IPRs, and its importances for the United States, and the need for a multilateral solution with GATT as the best available forum. And, IIPA works closely with the U.S. Trade Representative in the annual "Special 301" reviews on whether acts, policies or practices of any foreign country deny adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights or fair and equitable market access for U.S. persons relying on intellectual property protection. Private interest groups do not only collect statistics for IP Infringement, but also endeavor to acquire and protect the IPRs. The acquisition of rights and the efforts to protect the rights include a small army of people to monitor the market, take enforcement action, if necessary, engage law enforcement, lobby government agencies and other steps. In these ways, private interest groups of Korea should expand their powers to reflect their IP in trade policy.
목차
I. 의의
II. 무역정책과 지식재산
III. 무역정책에 있어 민간 기구
IV. 지식재산 관련 무역정책에 있어 민간 기구
V. 우리의 상황과 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
통상환경 변화에 따른 기술무역 활성화 방안 : 지식재산권을 중심으로
통상정보연구
2008 .06
-
한국의 지식재산권 무역에 관한 실증연구
무역연구
2016 .01
-
지식재산권 이론을 통해 본 한중일 FTA 협상 시의 시사점
국제정치연구
2012 .12
-
Intellectual Property Rights as an Engine of Economic Innovation in China’s Five-Year Plans -Vaulting Ambitions and Towering Challenges-
일감법학
2017 .01
-
한국의 지식재산권 무역불균형 극복을 위한 정책 대응 방향: 유럽연합 공동시장을 중심으로
EU연구
2018 .01
-
수출입통관 단계에서 지식재산권 침해와보호에 관한 연구
무역연구
2015 .01
-
외국의 지적재산권 정책이 한국의 수출규모에 미치는 영향
무역학회지
2006 .08
-
Intellectual Property Rights, Imitative Ability and Export Performance: The Korean Experience
Asian International Studies Review
2012 .01
-
고부가가치 무역을 위한 지식재산권 무역에 대한 실증연구
무역학자 전국대회 발표논문집
2016 .06
-
외국의 지적재산권 보호가 한국의 FDI에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 국가특성과 산업특성을 중심으로
관세학회지
2007 .02
-
APEC 회원국의 지적재산권 보호 수준이 역내 무역에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구
관세학회지
2009 .05
-
滥用知识产权市场支配地位之反垄断实施机制研究
중국법연구
2016 .01
-
Fair Trade and The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in U.S.-Korean Economic Relations
저스티스
1987 .12
-
Deconstructing Global Intellectual Property Rights Regimes over Biodiversity
대한지리학회지
2006 .06
-
불공정무역행위로 인한 지적재산권 보호방안에 관한 연구
무역연구
2010 .01
-
디자인 보호법제간 경합 현황과 경합의 처리를 둘러싼 제 문제
디자인과 법
2017 .03
-
APEC 회원국의 지적재산권 출원과 보호수준 분석 : EU와의 비교와 정책대안을 중심으로
관세학회지
2008 .12
-
On China’s Intellectual Property Rights Protection Online
통상정보연구
2004 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0