지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Despite continuing interest in the relative effectiveness of different types of written corrective feedback in both second language (L2) research and classroom, no one type of written feedback has yet been conclusively shown to be more effective than another. The present study investigated the differential efficacy of two types of focused written corrective feedback, direct error correction and indirect coded feedback, for L2 development. Forty-three Korean English as a foreign language (EFL) learners from three intact classes at a university were assigned to a control group or one of two experimental groups (i.e., direct vs. indirect coded feedback). A pretest-post-test design was employed to assess improvement in learners’ ability to use the target structure, the past counterfactual conditional. Only the direct written feedback group significantly outperformed the control group on the post-test involving a new piece of writing. Results indicated that direct written feedback was more effective than indirect written feedback provided in the form of coded feedback in improving learners’ subsequent accuracy in using a complex syntactic structure in a short-term period.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. The Present Study
4. Method
5. Results
6. Discussion and Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bitchener, John / 2008 / Evidence in support of written corrective feedback / Journal of Second Language Writing 17 : 102 ~ 118
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bitchener, John / 2012 / A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’of written CF / Journal of Second Language Writing 21 : 348 ~ 363
3. [단행본] - Bitchener, John / 2012 / Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing / Routledge
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bitchener, John / 2010 / Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback / Journal of Second Language Writing 19 : 207 ~ 217
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bitchner, John / 2005 / The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing / Journal of Second Language Writing 14 : 191 ~ 205
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bitchener, John / 2012 / A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’of written CF / Journal of Second Language Writing 21 : 348 ~ 363
3. [단행본] - Bitchener, John / 2012 / Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing / Routledge
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bitchener, John / 2010 / Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback / Journal of Second Language Writing 19 : 207 ~ 217
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bitchner, John / 2005 / The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing / Journal of Second Language Writing 14 : 191 ~ 205
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
The Differential Effect of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Two English Structures
Bo-Ram Suh
영어학
2014
.09
Learners’ Proficiency Level and the Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback on L2 Acquisition
Sung-Soo Jang
응용언어학
2014
.09
Preferences for Error Correction : Teachers vs. Students; High vs. Low Anxiety Group
Pa
,
k Hyang-Sook
신영어영문학
2011
.02
고등학생 영어쓰기에서 교사의 간접 형태 오류 수정 피드백의 효과
한정화
,
김은정
영어영문학
2013
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-701-000942259