지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.6
- 수록면
- 564 - 579 (16page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of Maritime Safety Tribunal is that experts about ship operation investigate and reveal causes of marine disasters and suggest plans to prevent recurrence in Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal which is a kind of administrative court. Despite the fact that 72% of marine disasters is fishing vessel accidents and 75% of collision accidents between vessels which most occur is related to fishing boats, it is the very serious problem that there is no any person with licenses of marine technicians for fishing vessels in judges and investigators of Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal.
The operational characteristics of fishing vessels, their sizes, and shift patterns of duties in wheelhouses are completely and incommensurably different from those of merchant vessels. By the way, if the investigators and judges who just consist of merchant vessel experts investigate and judge marine accidents about fishing vessels, there could be errors in establishment of policies to investigate and reveal their causes and prevent recurrence of accidents. Especially, in case of collision accidents between fishing vessels and merchant vessels, it is thought that the marine accident interested provides causes which can be doubtful about fairness of judges.
Therefore, it is thought that the ratio of judges and investigators is most desirable to compose it to be similar to the occurrence frequency of marine accidents. For this, the following solution plans are suggested.
First, qualification for appointment requires first class marine technicians. But there is the only one vessel which needs the first class in fishing vessels.
Therefore, it is thought that the provisory clause should be added so that the second class marine technicians can be used instead of the first class ones.
Second, the marine accidents of fishing vessels reach 72% but the fact that there is no any judge and investigator with licenses of marine technicians for fishing vessels is thought to go against the purpose of establishment of Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal. Therefore, it is thought that there is ,at least, one more judges and investigators in the central and local Korean Maritime Safety Tribunals. The same method should be applied to judge assistants and investigation assistants.
The operational characteristics of fishing vessels, their sizes, and shift patterns of duties in wheelhouses are completely and incommensurably different from those of merchant vessels. By the way, if the investigators and judges who just consist of merchant vessel experts investigate and judge marine accidents about fishing vessels, there could be errors in establishment of policies to investigate and reveal their causes and prevent recurrence of accidents. Especially, in case of collision accidents between fishing vessels and merchant vessels, it is thought that the marine accident interested provides causes which can be doubtful about fairness of judges.
Therefore, it is thought that the ratio of judges and investigators is most desirable to compose it to be similar to the occurrence frequency of marine accidents. For this, the following solution plans are suggested.
First, qualification for appointment requires first class marine technicians. But there is the only one vessel which needs the first class in fishing vessels.
Therefore, it is thought that the provisory clause should be added so that the second class marine technicians can be used instead of the first class ones.
Second, the marine accidents of fishing vessels reach 72% but the fact that there is no any judge and investigator with licenses of marine technicians for fishing vessels is thought to go against the purpose of establishment of Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal. Therefore, it is thought that there is ,at least, one more judges and investigators in the central and local Korean Maritime Safety Tribunals. The same method should be applied to judge assistants and investigation assistants.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 해양안전심판원의 인적 구성의 문제점
Ⅲ. 해양안전심판제도
Ⅳ. 어선 관련 해양사고의 현황
Ⅴ. 어선의 운항 특성
Ⅵ. 개선방안
Ⅶ. 결론
Reference
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
1. [보고서] - Bak Mun-Gab / 2012 / Report on the Cause analysis and method to prevent a recurrence of marine accidents between Fishing and Merchant vessel, A Report of Research : 31 ~ 34
2. [학위논문] - Baek Ok-Hee / 2009 / A Study on the Investigation and Judgement of Marine Accidents / Graduate School of Mokpo Maritime University
3. [기타자료] - IMO / / Guidelines for the Investigation of Human factors in Marine Casualties and Incidents, Appendix 2
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Jo Dong-O / 2001 / A Study on Reform Directions for effectiveness of Marine Accident' Cause Examination / Marine fishery 206 : 8 ~ 11
5. [보고서] - Jo Dong-O / 2002 / A Study for Evolution Direction of Korea' Maritime Safety Tribunal : 105 ~ 115
2. [학위논문] - Baek Ok-Hee / 2009 / A Study on the Investigation and Judgement of Marine Accidents / Graduate School of Mokpo Maritime University
3. [기타자료] - IMO / / Guidelines for the Investigation of Human factors in Marine Casualties and Incidents, Appendix 2
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Jo Dong-O / 2001 / A Study on Reform Directions for effectiveness of Marine Accident' Cause Examination / Marine fishery 206 : 8 ~ 11
5. [보고서] - Jo Dong-O / 2002 / A Study for Evolution Direction of Korea' Maritime Safety Tribunal : 105 ~ 115
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 5년간 국내 연근해에서 발생한 해양사고에 대한 주성분분석
김영식
수산해양교육연구
2016
.04
해양안전심판법상 징계재결과 인과관계의 추정법리 : 2015. 4. 6. 고지 중앙해심 제2015-05호 재결의 평석을 중심으로
이정원
법학연구
2017
.02
해양안전심판에서의 불이익변경금지원칙의 적용과 한계
임석원
법학연구
2013
.09
개항의 항계 안에서의 선박충돌에 따른 법률상의 쟁점 : 해양안전심판원의 재결사례에 대한 분석을 중심으로
임석원
수산해양교육연구
2016
.02
우리나라 시운전 선박의 해양사고 위험성 조사 분석 연구
박영수
,
김종성
,
김종수
외 2명
수산해양교육연구
2015
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-520-003216257