지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Never have the environmental problems been more deplorably corrupt. This is an unusual aberration for modern law. When the environmental dispute occurs, neither civil action nor administrative litigation offer a rational solution. If environmental pollution or infringement once occurs, the severity of the damages are beyond our imagination and impossible to recover. So, we need a secure compensation way against all damages. Futhermore, prepare well advanced prevention program for the nature of the environmental pollution or infringement. General antidote on environmental disputes are civil action and administrative litigation. Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration are the new alternative dispute settlement. Environmental effects evaluation is no less important than general means today, and we need to introduce a new system as a advanced prevention program. It is a punitive damages.
Punitive damages punishes the injurer who commit malicious torts and prevents recurrence of crime by others. This concept appeared at first in the British Jurisdiction which is developed from Punitive damages in Anglo-American law. Currently it is being applied most vigorously in U.S.A. However, there is no other place that this is accepted in the continent legal system countries. Multiple compensation system that is resemblant to Punitive damages existed in ancient times in many countries including Korea in history. Funtion of Punitive damages can devide into natural side and metrical side. Natural sides consist of five functions. They are punishment and control, satisfactory function, law observance function, social compensation function and functions of social reformation and control. On the other hand, metrical aspects consist of three roles, namely coming off profit through torts, function of supplying manuscript costs of a lawsuit and lawyer expense and reparation function of compensating about spiritual damages. Problems also exist in punitive damages compensation system. As Punitive damages was introduced and developed in Anglo-American law system, we must consider harmony with the current law.
Punitive damages punishes the injurer who commit malicious torts and prevents recurrence of crime by others. This concept appeared at first in the British Jurisdiction which is developed from Punitive damages in Anglo-American law. Currently it is being applied most vigorously in U.S.A. However, there is no other place that this is accepted in the continent legal system countries. Multiple compensation system that is resemblant to Punitive damages existed in ancient times in many countries including Korea in history. Funtion of Punitive damages can devide into natural side and metrical side. Natural sides consist of five functions. They are punishment and control, satisfactory function, law observance function, social compensation function and functions of social reformation and control. On the other hand, metrical aspects consist of three roles, namely coming off profit through torts, function of supplying manuscript costs of a lawsuit and lawyer expense and reparation function of compensating about spiritual damages. Problems also exist in punitive damages compensation system. As Punitive damages was introduced and developed in Anglo-American law system, we must consider harmony with the current law.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일반적인 환경분쟁 해결수단
Ⅲ. 예방적인 환경분쟁 해결수단
Ⅳ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강정혜 / 2008 / 대체적 분쟁해결제도(ADR)로서의 환경분쟁조정과 환경소송 / 환경법연구 30 (3) : 185 ~ 204
4. [학술대회논문] - 김병일 / 2007 / 지적재산권침해로 인한 손해배상과 징벌적 손해배상의 법리 / 2007년 한국법제연구원 워크샵 - 징벌적 손해배상제의 법리와 도입가능성 -
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김상겸 / 2003 / 환경국가와 환경영향평가제도 / 환경법연구 25 (1) : 1 ~ 26
7. [학위논문] - 김상천 / 2010 / 환경침해의 사법적 구제 / 박사 / 안동대학교 대학원
8. [학술대회논문] - 김성찬 / 2007 / 소비자법상 징벌적 배상제도 도입에 관한 소고 / 2007년 한국법제연구원 워크샵 - 징벌적 손해배상제의 법리와 도입가능성 -
4. [학술대회논문] - 김병일 / 2007 / 지적재산권침해로 인한 손해배상과 징벌적 손해배상의 법리 / 2007년 한국법제연구원 워크샵 - 징벌적 손해배상제의 법리와 도입가능성 -
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김상겸 / 2003 / 환경국가와 환경영향평가제도 / 환경법연구 25 (1) : 1 ~ 26
7. [학위논문] - 김상천 / 2010 / 환경침해의 사법적 구제 / 박사 / 안동대학교 대학원
8. [학술대회논문] - 김성찬 / 2007 / 소비자법상 징벌적 배상제도 도입에 관한 소고 / 2007년 한국법제연구원 워크샵 - 징벌적 손해배상제의 법리와 도입가능성 -
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
대법원 1995. 9. 15. 선고 95다23378 판결
가. 환경권에 관한 헌법 제35조의 규정이 개개의 국민에게 직접으로 구체적인 사법상의 권리를 부여한 것이라고 보기는 어렵고, 사법상의 권리로서의 환경권이 인정되려면 그에 관한 명문의 법률규정이 있거나 관계법령의 규정취지 및 조리에 비추어 권리의 주체, 대상, 내용, 행사방법 등이 구체적으로 정립될 수 있어야 한다.
자세히 보기
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-300-003338510