지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 5 - 137 (133page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)
2009
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to develop an objective vocational function screen test to aid job-seekers with disabilities choose appropriate employment service. We depicted factors and items from previous vocational assessment researches and screen tests from foreign countries to develop the EDI vocational function screen test. A questionnaire including the factors and items were distributed to 21 vocational rehabilitation specialists three times using the Delphi method. As a result, 29 items were selected for the EDI vocational function screen test. The five function and items are independent living(4 items), physical function(6 items), cognitive function(7 items), social function(7 items) and vocational function(5 items). Each factor has a reliability of .65, .66, .73, .77, .83 respectively. The total reliability of items are .90.
A pilot test for the EDI vocational function screen test was conducted amongst 619 workers with disabilities. The pilot test was conducted depending on the type of disability, type of employment service and type of workplace. Based on the pilot test, the exploratory factor analysis was conducted. As a result, EDI vocational function screen test was divided into two areas - physical and mental. The physical area consists of independent living function, movement function and language function. The mental area consists of vocational function, cognitive function and social function. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis show that the analysis model of the physical area show that the items in the independent living function had a low explanatory function thus only the GFI received above 0.9. However, the item is an important factor of the vocational area for people with disabilities, therefore the analysis model was selected as appropriate. The analysis model of the mental area showed CFI, NFI, IFI as higher than .9. Also RMR and RMSEA analysis model showed that it was adequate. After analyzing the EDI vocational function screen test factors" reliability, it showed that independent living function is .80, movement function .76, and language function .74, for the physical area. The vocational function was .93, cognitive function .91, social function .85 for the mental area which illustrates the reliability and validity of the analysis model.
After analyzing whether the EDI vocational function screen test differs according to the type and degree of disability, type of employment service and type of workplace, we found that there was a meaningful difference regarding the above factors. This shows that the EDI vocational function screen test helps job seekers with disabilities find employment service and workplace in accordance with their vocational level. In addition, when we applied the discriminant analysis, the degree of disability, type of employment service and type of workplace also had a significant difference regarding the above factors. Finally, proposal to standardize the EDI vocational unction screen test was provided for future research.
A pilot test for the EDI vocational function screen test was conducted amongst 619 workers with disabilities. The pilot test was conducted depending on the type of disability, type of employment service and type of workplace. Based on the pilot test, the exploratory factor analysis was conducted. As a result, EDI vocational function screen test was divided into two areas - physical and mental. The physical area consists of independent living function, movement function and language function. The mental area consists of vocational function, cognitive function and social function. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis show that the analysis model of the physical area show that the items in the independent living function had a low explanatory function thus only the GFI received above 0.9. However, the item is an important factor of the vocational area for people with disabilities, therefore the analysis model was selected as appropriate. The analysis model of the mental area showed CFI, NFI, IFI as higher than .9. Also RMR and RMSEA analysis model showed that it was adequate. After analyzing the EDI vocational function screen test factors" reliability, it showed that independent living function is .80, movement function .76, and language function .74, for the physical area. The vocational function was .93, cognitive function .91, social function .85 for the mental area which illustrates the reliability and validity of the analysis model.
After analyzing whether the EDI vocational function screen test differs according to the type and degree of disability, type of employment service and type of workplace, we found that there was a meaningful difference regarding the above factors. This shows that the EDI vocational function screen test helps job seekers with disabilities find employment service and workplace in accordance with their vocational level. In addition, when we applied the discriminant analysis, the degree of disability, type of employment service and type of workplace also had a significant difference regarding the above factors. Finally, proposal to standardize the EDI vocational unction screen test was provided for future research.
목차
[목차]
[Abstract]
[연구요약]
[제1장 검사개발의 필요성]
제1절 검사개발의 필요성
제2절 검사개발 목적
제3절 검사개발 과정
[제2장 EDI 직업기능탐색검사 개발방법]
제1절 EDI 직업기능탐색검사 개발을 위한 문헌검토
제2절 EDI 직업기능탐색검사 개발을 위한 델파이조사
제3절 EDI 직업기능탐색검사 타당성 검증
제4절 검사 요인별 차이검증
[제3장 EDI 직업기능탐색검사 개발을 위한 문헌검토]
제1절 검사요인
제2절 검사문항
제3절 측정방법
[제4장 EDI 직업기능탐색검사 개발]
제1절 검사 구성을 위한 델파이조사 결과 분석
제2절 EDI 직업기능탐색검사 구성
[제5장 EDI 직업기능탐색검사 타당성 분석]
제1절 타당도 및 신뢰도 분석
제2절 수렴·변별타당도
[제6장 검사 요인별 차이검증]
제1절 장애유형별 차이분석
제2절 장애정도별 차이분석
제3절 고용서비스 유형별 차이분석
제4절 취업 사업장 유형별 차이분석
제5절 장애·고용서비스·사업장유형별 판별분석
[제7장 결론]
제1절 EDI 직업기능탐색검사의 요인과 특성
제2절 EDI 직업기능탐색검사의 타당성 검증
제3절 제언
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
EDI 직업기능탐색검사 개발 I
기본과제보고서
2008 .12
-
EDI 직업기능탐색검사 개발 I
연구자료
2009 .01
-
EDI 직업기능탐색검사 개발 II
기본과제보고서
2009 .11
-
장애인 직업기능탐색검사 개발을 위한 예비 연구
장애와 고용
2009 .11
-
“V过O的N”的语义类型及功能考察
중국과 중국학
2016 .05
-
｢직업기능스크리닝검사｣ 시범사업 평가
기본과제보고서
2015 .12
-
「직업기능스크리닝 검사」의 진단적 효율성 탐색
장애와 고용
2015 .08
-
사례를 통해 본 기업체 직무중심 직업능력평가
기본과제보고서
2012 .12
-
Assessment for Vocational Evaluation with Persons with Disabilities in Korea
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2004 .06
-
센터 직업생활교육프로그램 내용구성 연구
기본과제보고서
2008 .12
-
취업알선 상담원을 위한 직업평가
기본과제보고서
2011 .12
-
The Paradigm Shift of Vocational Evaluation in the Field of Vocational Rehabilitation
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2004 .06
-
The Paradigm Shift of Vocational Evaluation in the Field of Vocational Rehabilitation
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2004 .06
-
장애유형별 특화훈련 효과분석
연구자료
2009 .01
-
한ㆍ독ㆍ일 장애인 직업훈련 체제 비교 연구
연구자료
2009 .01
-
장애유형별 특화훈련 효과분석
기본과제보고서
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-336-000533657