지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to present a cultural policy, especially a basic direction for arts policy and practical tasks in the next 10 years. First, this article points out the performance and limitations of policies for culture and the arts that President Noh Mu-hyeon’s Participative Government has developed and implemented for the past 5 years. Furthermore, it specifically presents a basic direction and practical tasks for future cultural and the artistic policies, especially amid rapidly changing surroundings, after reviewing the possible political, economic, social and cultural changes in culture and arts policies.
The culture and arts policies of the Participative Government, highlighting the three values of ‘autonomy,’ ‘participation’ and ‘decentralization of power’, began with its expansion of autonomy and creativity. Improving the autonomy in culture and the arts has led to the establishment of the Arts Council Korea (ARKO) and accompanying efforts to promote cultural creativity nationwide. In the mean time, the orientation of boosting creativity has produced an effort to achieve international competitiveness by making artists’ creative production and quality of cultural goods of world-class level.
With these two results, the most distinguished part of the Participative Government’s performance has been its strengthening of the autonomy of basic arts through the expansion and firming up of the foundation of artistic demand, mainly by expanding cultural support for vulnerable classes in our society and by emphasizing the importance of basic arts education.
Today, our society is undergoing great changes in the areas of politics, economy and social structure, and these changes demand a new cultural and political response, as well as changes in the cultural domain. Above all, it must be pointed out that globalization and localization are proceeding. The basic direction our society should take includes the fusion of cultural contents and growth of the knowledge-based industry, the advent of a leisure-centered consumer society according to the introduction of the five-day work week system, demographical changes due to the rapid increase of foreigners and the elderly, and the diversification of basic arts.
Through what policies will we be able to heighten artists’ creativity and enhance people’s quality of life in this changing environment? I have classified the basic direction and practical tasks to solve this into seven sectors. First, I have presented the spread of social recognition for the value of culture and arts, promotion of professional artists’ status and the improvement of creative environments, expansion of artistic autonomy by pushing for the growth of the arts industry and the market, intensification of support for participative and experiential activities, and adaptation of multi-ethnic and multicultural society through effective literary policies.
On top of this, I have suggested that we should produce local creative cultures and work to popularize the Korean culture and art around the world and beyond the limitations of public culture. We should also expand demand for art and culture through the intensification of basic arts education, while increasing cultural budget in order to realize these goals. We should also immediately arrange the financial resources of cultural promotion funds.
The culture and arts policies of the Participative Government, highlighting the three values of ‘autonomy,’ ‘participation’ and ‘decentralization of power’, began with its expansion of autonomy and creativity. Improving the autonomy in culture and the arts has led to the establishment of the Arts Council Korea (ARKO) and accompanying efforts to promote cultural creativity nationwide. In the mean time, the orientation of boosting creativity has produced an effort to achieve international competitiveness by making artists’ creative production and quality of cultural goods of world-class level.
With these two results, the most distinguished part of the Participative Government’s performance has been its strengthening of the autonomy of basic arts through the expansion and firming up of the foundation of artistic demand, mainly by expanding cultural support for vulnerable classes in our society and by emphasizing the importance of basic arts education.
Today, our society is undergoing great changes in the areas of politics, economy and social structure, and these changes demand a new cultural and political response, as well as changes in the cultural domain. Above all, it must be pointed out that globalization and localization are proceeding. The basic direction our society should take includes the fusion of cultural contents and growth of the knowledge-based industry, the advent of a leisure-centered consumer society according to the introduction of the five-day work week system, demographical changes due to the rapid increase of foreigners and the elderly, and the diversification of basic arts.
Through what policies will we be able to heighten artists’ creativity and enhance people’s quality of life in this changing environment? I have classified the basic direction and practical tasks to solve this into seven sectors. First, I have presented the spread of social recognition for the value of culture and arts, promotion of professional artists’ status and the improvement of creative environments, expansion of artistic autonomy by pushing for the growth of the arts industry and the market, intensification of support for participative and experiential activities, and adaptation of multi-ethnic and multicultural society through effective literary policies.
On top of this, I have suggested that we should produce local creative cultures and work to popularize the Korean culture and art around the world and beyond the limitations of public culture. We should also expand demand for art and culture through the intensification of basic arts education, while increasing cultural budget in order to realize these goals. We should also immediately arrange the financial resources of cultural promotion funds.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 참여정부 문화예술정책의 성과와 한계
Ⅲ. 문화예술정책의 환경 변화 양상
Ⅳ. 향후 문화예술정책의 방향과 과제
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
여가활동으로서 문화예술체험에 관한 시론
관광연구저널
2011 .12
-
대중예술문화산업과 헌법－법제개선을 위한 기본방향－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
도서지역에 있어서 창의성 향상을 위한 문화예술교육의 필요성 및 역할
한국도서연구
2019 .01
-
‘문화적 자본’ 이론을 활용한 지역문화향유의 함의에 관한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2009 .05
-
문화예술교육정책의 비판적 재구성과 미래전망 : 문화정책과 교육정책의 불완전한 통합을 넘어서
문화정책논총
2008 .01
-
문화도시마케팅으로서 지역문화예술축제의 가치와 발전방향에 관한 질적 연구 -부산국제연극제를 중심으로-
한국항공경영학회지
2011 .01
-
한국과 오스트리아의 문화예술교육정책 비교연구
미술과 교육
2008 .12
-
문화국가를 위한 법체계 검토
문화정책논총
2007 .02
-
문화복지와 부산문화재단의 역할
지역사회연구
2012 .12
-
전통공연예술 활성화 정책의 전망과 과제
문화정책논총
2008 .01
-
The Art of Policy Making : The Art of Policy Making의 이해와 서평
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2014 .10
-
예술교육 관련 법령의 비교·분석: ｢문화예술교육 지원법｣을 중심으로
예술교육연구
2018 .01
-
창의산업 체제의 문화예술정책 동학 : 문화기획자들의 실천을 중심으로
한국언론정보학보
2017 .12
-
Building Strong Culture and Art Education Programs: Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Approaches to Policy
미술과 교육
2013 .08
-
참여정부의 문화법제의 변화와 그 평가
문화정책논총
2008 .01
-
지역에 밀착한 문화예술교육 정책: 성남문화재단 문화예술교육 정책 전개 과정을 중심으로
도시연구
2017 .12
-
문화예술교육정책은 왜 혼란스러운가? : 문화예술교육정책 연구를 위한 사회학적 시론
문화와 사회
2017 .08
-
한국 문화예술교육 연구 경향 분석
문화정책논총
2017 .01
-
문화예술단체 모금을 위한 문화예술기부 거버넌스 모형 연구
문화산업연구
2012 .06
-
도서지역에 있어서 문화예술교육의 필요성 및 가치성 - 음악교육을 중심으로 -
한국도서연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-505-003510111