지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to investigate formal and functional characteristics of gender systems of contemporary Chadic languages from a diachronic point of view. To do this the gender system of Hausa, the most well-known Chadic language, has first been thoroughly studied, and on that basis 7 gender-related comparative parameters have been established for revealing the real nature of gender system in Chadic. The number of Chadic languages investigated in this study was 32 languages from all four Chadic branches (West, Central, East, and Masa branch).
The following are a summary of the result of the study according to the gender-related comparative parameters.
(1) Which languages have a gender system? - Most languages from West, East, and Masa branch, and some from Central branch have a gender system, whereas most of Central languages do not.
(2) Which types of gender occur? - All the Chadic languages that have a gender system distinguish only two genders, feminine and masculine. There is no Chadic language that has a neuter gender (like in German) or a noun class system (like in Bantu).
(3) Is there gender distinction in plural? - There is no Chadic language that shows gender distinction in plural. However, in some languages (e.g. Hausa, Buduma, etc.) the masculine gender goes with the plural in agreement in certain syntactic constructions like genitival, demonstrative, etc.
(4) Which person distinguishes gender? - All the Chadic languages with a gender system distinguish gender in 2nd and 3rd person.
(5) Way of gender agreement -The ways and environments of gender agreement differ from language to language. The most frequent gender agreement occurs in personal pronouns, genitival/possessive construction, and demonstratives. In some languages (e.g. Hausa) there occurs gender agreement also in copula and relative constructions.
(6) Are Gender markers of Proto-Chadic reconstructable? - From this study two striking gender-related formatives emerge: {<SUP>*</SUP>T} for feminine and {<SUP>*</SUP>N} for masculine. They are the most frequently used formatives across the branches. This study reconfirms also the reconstruction of Proto-Chadic gender markers by Schuh(1983).
(7) Is a gender recognizable in the word form? - Ca. the half of the languages shows an gender indicator in word itself, the most used being a final vowel {-a} for feminine nouns. Whether or not it has historical relevance, one needs further investigation.
The following are a summary of the result of the study according to the gender-related comparative parameters.
(1) Which languages have a gender system? - Most languages from West, East, and Masa branch, and some from Central branch have a gender system, whereas most of Central languages do not.
(2) Which types of gender occur? - All the Chadic languages that have a gender system distinguish only two genders, feminine and masculine. There is no Chadic language that has a neuter gender (like in German) or a noun class system (like in Bantu).
(3) Is there gender distinction in plural? - There is no Chadic language that shows gender distinction in plural. However, in some languages (e.g. Hausa, Buduma, etc.) the masculine gender goes with the plural in agreement in certain syntactic constructions like genitival, demonstrative, etc.
(4) Which person distinguishes gender? - All the Chadic languages with a gender system distinguish gender in 2nd and 3rd person.
(5) Way of gender agreement -The ways and environments of gender agreement differ from language to language. The most frequent gender agreement occurs in personal pronouns, genitival/possessive construction, and demonstratives. In some languages (e.g. Hausa) there occurs gender agreement also in copula and relative constructions.
(6) Are Gender markers of Proto-Chadic reconstructable? - From this study two striking gender-related formatives emerge: {<SUP>*</SUP>T} for feminine and {<SUP>*</SUP>N} for masculine. They are the most frequently used formatives across the branches. This study reconfirms also the reconstruction of Proto-Chadic gender markers by Schuh(1983).
(7) Is a gender recognizable in the word form? - Ca. the half of the languages shows an gender indicator in word itself, the most used being a final vowel {-a} for feminine nouns. Whether or not it has historical relevance, one needs further investigation.
목차
1. 들어가는 글
2. 연구 내용, 범위 및 방법
3. 연구 결과
4. 나가는 글
〈참고문헌〉
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
차딕 어군 언어들의 유형적 특성에 관한 고찰
Asian Journal of African Studies
2006 .08
-
차딕어들에 나타나는 시제, 상, 서법(TAM) 범주의 유형적 특성 및 통시적 발전 과정에 관한 연구 : 서부와 동부 차딕어들을 중심으로
Asian Journal of African Studies
2011 .08
-
차딕어들에 나타나는 동사파생체계의 비교 연구
한국아프리카학회지
2008 .06
-
차딕어들에 나타나는 부정주어표시 (Indefinite subject marking) 유형 및 기능적 특성에 대한 연구
한국아프리카학회지
2005 .06
-
아프리카 제어에 나타난 성(Gender)범주의 유형학적 비교 : 스와힐리어의 명사부류체계를 중심으로
Asian Journal of African Studies
2008 .02
-
젠더예산분석
한국지방재정논집
2004 .12
-
성과 관련된 과제의 선호에서의 성 도식의 영향
아동학회지
1992 .12
-
아동의 성 도식과 성관련 과제의 기억 및 선호
아동학회지
1994 .06
-
성평등입법과 Gender-Mainstreaming
법학논집
2007 .01
-
성주류화관점에서 본 지역여성정책 : 광주광역시 여성정책에 대한 사례연구
지역사회연구
2011 .12
-
젠더와 건강 : 성인지적 보건정책을 위한 시론
보건행정학회지
2008 .01
-
성 주류화의 과제와 단계적 추진 방안
경기논단
2002 .09
-
Evaluating Welfare State in Gender Perspective
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2008 .06
-
젠더놀이(gender play) : 초등학교 학생들의 이분법적 젠더 정체성 경계 넘기
열린교육연구
2006 .01
-
자치단체 공무원의 성인지정책 인식에 관한 연구 - 전라북도 공무원을 중심으로 -
한국자치행정학보
2013 .01
-
성주류화 정책을 위한 젠더거버넌스 형성가능성 : 서울지역 성별영향분석평가사업 모니터링 과정 분석
사회과학연구
2015 .05
-
사회적 갈등 해소를 위한 학교 교육의 실천 방향: 젠더불평등을 중심으로
Global Creative Leader : Education & Learning
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0