개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.9
- 수록면
- 87 - 107 (21page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It seems that the popular terminologies in the area of political sciences and public administration in the 21 century are region, balance, development, governance, metropolitan and collaboration, etc. Despite of the various implications of their terminologies from an academic perspective, most frequent combination of the terminologies are regional development and regional governance. This is presumably, because regional development and regional governance are one of policies on which higher priority is supposed to be imposed.
In order to address political and administrative problems faced in the 21 century considerable interests and concerns are on the increase in the Europe. The importance of region has been deeply associated with economic growth, integration and harmony, improvement of efficiency and effectiveness of public services, enhancement of transparency and accountability in the policy process, and protection of geographical, cultural, and social-economic diversity in Europe.
Various policies for balanced regional development in Korea have resulted in a wide gap between regions in several respects. This was one of bases for a comprehensive regional balanced development plan established by the Noh Administration. Lee Administration slightly adjusted regional policy to its political philosophy in terms of 5+2 regional development plan.
It is premature to predict shapes and contents of 5+2 regional development plan under the Lee Administration because the Lee Administration has not announced any commitment and specific policy ideas associated with 5+2 regional development plan.
As a result, the purpose of this paper is to analyze every conceivable choices of organizational forms of 5+2 regional development. In response to the central organizational forms, local imaginable options are also under review.
This paper discussed every conceivable governance in response to the emergence of new regionalism in association with regional development. It seems that there are many choices from a selective governance bases on self-rule to integrated governance without flexibility.
Despite of the diversity it seems certain that the governance for regional development should be based on collaborations between local governments and the central government. In light of the features of the 21 century, including diversity, harmony, and peace, the governance of the 21 century is to be created on the basis of decentralization which is able to promote local flexibility.
On the basis of assumptions mentioned above this paper is to suggest two recommendations of the conceivable options of combinations of organizations which are supposed to handle 5+2 regional growth plan. From a short term perspective, the combination of regional development agency-regional assembly may be appropriate. The governance of regional development agency is also be suggested to be organized in a decentralized way. The key funcitons of regional assembly are supposed to consult, supervise and monitor activities of regional development agency.
From a long term perspective, the establishment of regional government is more efficient to coordinate different policy positions and interests between different local governments. The regional government is to be created on the basis of and amalgamation and consolidation of current upper-tier local governments in Korea.
In order to address political and administrative problems faced in the 21 century considerable interests and concerns are on the increase in the Europe. The importance of region has been deeply associated with economic growth, integration and harmony, improvement of efficiency and effectiveness of public services, enhancement of transparency and accountability in the policy process, and protection of geographical, cultural, and social-economic diversity in Europe.
Various policies for balanced regional development in Korea have resulted in a wide gap between regions in several respects. This was one of bases for a comprehensive regional balanced development plan established by the Noh Administration. Lee Administration slightly adjusted regional policy to its political philosophy in terms of 5+2 regional development plan.
It is premature to predict shapes and contents of 5+2 regional development plan under the Lee Administration because the Lee Administration has not announced any commitment and specific policy ideas associated with 5+2 regional development plan.
As a result, the purpose of this paper is to analyze every conceivable choices of organizational forms of 5+2 regional development. In response to the central organizational forms, local imaginable options are also under review.
This paper discussed every conceivable governance in response to the emergence of new regionalism in association with regional development. It seems that there are many choices from a selective governance bases on self-rule to integrated governance without flexibility.
Despite of the diversity it seems certain that the governance for regional development should be based on collaborations between local governments and the central government. In light of the features of the 21 century, including diversity, harmony, and peace, the governance of the 21 century is to be created on the basis of decentralization which is able to promote local flexibility.
On the basis of assumptions mentioned above this paper is to suggest two recommendations of the conceivable options of combinations of organizations which are supposed to handle 5+2 regional growth plan. From a short term perspective, the combination of regional development agency-regional assembly may be appropriate. The governance of regional development agency is also be suggested to be organized in a decentralized way. The key funcitons of regional assembly are supposed to consult, supervise and monitor activities of regional development agency.
From a long term perspective, the establishment of regional government is more efficient to coordinate different policy positions and interests between different local governments. The regional government is to be created on the basis of and amalgamation and consolidation of current upper-tier local governments in Korea.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 지역주의에 대한 이론적 논의
Ⅲ. 우리나라의 지역 거버넌스의 형태
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지역발전과 광역 (지역) 거버넌스의 형태와 과제
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2008 .09
-
영국 잉글랜드 지역 거버넌스의 이해
한국사회와 행정연구
2010 .11
-
국가균형발전을 위한 지역정책 패러다임의 변화와 방법론
도시행정학보
2010 .06
-
한국의 지역정책과 공간계획, 정책수단의 상호 조응성에 괸한 연구
한국지역개발학회지
2011 .11
-
지역발전을 위한 중앙-지방 역할분담에 관한 연구 : 지역산업정책을 중심으로
국토연구
2004 .06
-
지역개발학의 정체성과 발전방향
한국지역개발학회지
2011 .11
-
실천성의 측면에서 본 우리나라 지역개발정책의 비판적 검토와 정책과제
도시행정학보
2003 .12
-
박근혜정부의 지역정책에 있어서 지역생활권의 권역설정과 협력 거버넌스체제 구축의 정책과제
한국지역개발학회지
2013 .11
-
도시 지역발전과 거버넌스 : 부산ㆍ울산 지역혁신협의회의 비교연구
지역사회연구
2006 .12
-
The search of governance model for regional development in Asian Countries
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2014 .07
-
지역개발론
한국지역지리학회지
1995 .09
-
리저널 거버넌스 측면에서 대테러 협력체제의 구축방안
법학연구
2005 .06
-
지역개발사업의 통합적 추진방안 : 신공공관리적 접근방법을 중심으로
국토연구
2007 .03
-
중국의 지역균형개발정책 효과 및 영향요인에 관한 연구
도시행정학보
2006 .12
-
지방대학 육성을 통한 지역균형발전 방안
지역연구
2002 .12
-
한국의 지역발전 전략에 관한 제안
경기논단
2008 .06
-
EU의 지역정책 변화와 지역혁신정책의 함의
국토연구
2002 .09
-
구조방정식을 이용한 지역인재육성사업 운영체계의 성과에 미치는 영향요인 분석 : HRD 거버넌스 체계를 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2015 .06
-
영국 광역전략계획체계에 있어서 통합전략계획의 역할과 과제
한국지역개발학회지
2007 .09
-
분권형 지역발전체제 구축 : 정치경제학적 분석
국토연구
2006 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-359-001372168