지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The corporate social responsibility and business ethics were introduced when laissez-faire economic order exposed its limits and was converted into Keynesian interventionalism in early 20th century due to social conflicts, such as class struggle. The importance was emphasized on a new level in the face of economic environmental changes such as information revolution and globalization. From a business management point of view, as corporate survival and changed environment in management strategy should be accommodated and adapted, corporate ethics have changed from negative to positive, from internal to external and have been expanded and reorganized into global business management.
From an economic point of view, corporate social responsibility has been understood within a narrow range based on the thought that a social interest can be effectively accomplished if laissez-faire economics exist, that is, if corporations pursue optimalization. However, even though it is based on market fundamentalism, there is an assumption that the optimalization for profit maximization should be pursued under the condition of legitimacy. As the legitimacy assumed here means legitimacy as a social consensus derived as a result of social public choice on the efficiency and equity of market economy, it can be understood as a result of political public choice and neo-classical economics is not enough to present a persuasive demonstration on it.
The 21st century market economic order asks us to present a synthesis and such a historical demand requires a new interpretation of corporate social responsibility.
It should be recognized that the new order required by the 21st century capitalism(including Korea) is an accumulation of social capital such as ethics, moral and social responsibility and the key of social capital is ‘trust’ between social members. The ‘trust’ required for social capital by 21st century free market economic order uses active and dynamic social responsibility of corporations as an economic subject, especially, as conglomerates as key materials.
In particular, in establishing the range of corporate social responsibility in Korean society, we have to emphasize the principle of legitimacy. Major events where corporate social responsibility was a point at issue in the U.S.A. or Korea happened due to illegal or evasive behavior of conglomerates. So, in establishing the legal standards of this society that are propositions of the legitimacy principle, we have to establish the principle of constitutional law based on a free market economic order that modifies market failure effectively instead of a laissez-faire economic order. For this, the study suggests that we have to review the historical process and theoretical achievements of the German social market economic order and develop interdisciplinary approaches on basic economic order in our economic constitutional law based on all the principles of competitional order presented by W. Eucken and theoretical and positive achievements of modem economics. When an organized system of economic law, financial law and tax law is prepared, the contents of corporate social responsibility on a legal level will be decided.
From an economic point of view, corporate social responsibility has been understood within a narrow range based on the thought that a social interest can be effectively accomplished if laissez-faire economics exist, that is, if corporations pursue optimalization. However, even though it is based on market fundamentalism, there is an assumption that the optimalization for profit maximization should be pursued under the condition of legitimacy. As the legitimacy assumed here means legitimacy as a social consensus derived as a result of social public choice on the efficiency and equity of market economy, it can be understood as a result of political public choice and neo-classical economics is not enough to present a persuasive demonstration on it.
The 21st century market economic order asks us to present a synthesis and such a historical demand requires a new interpretation of corporate social responsibility.
It should be recognized that the new order required by the 21st century capitalism(including Korea) is an accumulation of social capital such as ethics, moral and social responsibility and the key of social capital is ‘trust’ between social members. The ‘trust’ required for social capital by 21st century free market economic order uses active and dynamic social responsibility of corporations as an economic subject, especially, as conglomerates as key materials.
In particular, in establishing the range of corporate social responsibility in Korean society, we have to emphasize the principle of legitimacy. Major events where corporate social responsibility was a point at issue in the U.S.A. or Korea happened due to illegal or evasive behavior of conglomerates. So, in establishing the legal standards of this society that are propositions of the legitimacy principle, we have to establish the principle of constitutional law based on a free market economic order that modifies market failure effectively instead of a laissez-faire economic order. For this, the study suggests that we have to review the historical process and theoretical achievements of the German social market economic order and develop interdisciplinary approaches on basic economic order in our economic constitutional law based on all the principles of competitional order presented by W. Eucken and theoretical and positive achievements of modem economics. When an organized system of economic law, financial law and tax law is prepared, the contents of corporate social responsibility on a legal level will be decided.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기업의 사회적 책임의 시대적 배경
Ⅲ. 기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 경영학적 고찰
Ⅳ. 기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 경제학적 고찰
Ⅴ. 기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 법학적 고찰
Ⅵ. 결론 - 자유주의 시장경제질서와 기업의 사회적 책임의 범주
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
【토론】
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 사회책임위원회제도의 도입 검토
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
'지속가능한 발전'과 '기업의 사회적 책임'의 통합과 법적 쟁점 : 서론적 고찰
증권법연구
2013 .08
-
소비자의 기업평가에 있어서 기업과 소비자의 사회적 책임활동의 상호작용효과
경영과학
2012 .07
-
기업의 사회적 책임활동을 통한 이미지 형성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
대한경영학회지
2013 .04
-
제품 시장 경쟁 및 기업의 사회적 책임 활동
산경연구논집
2019 .01
-
Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia
Global Asia
2007 .12
-
외식기업의 사회적 책임활동과 관광지에 관한 연구
관광연구저널
2008 .12
-
기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 척도 개발
마케팅연구
2005 .06
-
항공사의 사회적 책임활동이 신뢰와 애호도에 미치는 영향
관광레저연구
2011 .11
-
기업의 사회적 책임활동이 기업이미지에 미치는 영향 : 대기업과 중소기업의 비교
경영과학
2012 .03
-
사회적 공헌활동과 재무보고품질: 유통, 서비스 기업을 중심으로
유통과학연구
2018 .01
-
기업의 사회적 책임활동이 기업이미지 및 성과에 미치는 영향
서비스경영학회지
2010 .06
-
기업의 사회적 책임과 서비스품질의 관계에 관한 연구 : 신뢰와조절효과를 중심으로
서비스경영학회지
2011 .06
-
공공 담론과 기업의 사회적 책임
사회와이론
2011 .05
-
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CORPORATE INVESTMENT
국제거래와 법
2012 .12
-
기업의 사회적 책임, 지배구조, 자본비용 간의 관련성
국제회계연구
2013 .10
-
The Distribution Industry’s Social Responsibility and Ethics Management: Effects on Corporate Trust and Loyalty
유통과학연구
2014 .01
-
Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk : Around the World
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .10
-
기업의 사회적 책임활동에 따른 경영성과의 차별적 자본시장 반응
세무회계연구
2018 .01
-
헌법상의 경제질서에 대한 법경제학적 접근 : 신자유주의와 정부개입의 한계
기업법연구
2006 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000783211