메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
심영규 (배재대학교) 이진규 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제21집
발행연도
2007.8
수록면
470 - 490 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently international society has been witnessing the proliferation of international judicial organs. This development of international law, especially focusing on the activities of international judicial organs, makes a significant contribution to realization of the purposes of international law. However, the quantitative increase of international judicial organs inevitably triggers complex legal problems in international law. The main problems in activating the role of international judicial organs can be found in two aspects. First, generally, locus standi only belongs to states. This state-centric perspective of actors in international judicial organs inevitably brings about the restriction of activities of non-state actors in international society. Moreover, this restriction prevents international judicial organs from playing an active role in settling international disputes among non-state actors. Another problem comes from the jurisdictional matters. International judicial organs cannot be operated without the consent of states. International judicial organs heavily hinge on the voluntary submission of will of states. Second, although the proliferation of international judicial organs helps in dealing with various legal cases, it also makes jurisdictional problems: conflicts of jurisdiction of international judicial organs. Using different and various international judicial organs, states ultimately control the operation of international judicial organs by forum shopping.
This article makes a robust attempt to solve above-mentioned problems. The first solution to these problems can be found in the operational perspective of international judicial organs - expanding and strengthening jurisdiction of international judicial organs with conferring locus standi on individuals, inter-governmental organization, and non-governmental organizations. Also, establishment of compulsory jurisdiction should be followed. Second, as a panacea to conflicts of jurisdiction, common rules about jurisdiction of international judicial organs should be laid down through the cooperation of international judicial organs. Also, the competence of ICJ to render the advisory opinion can be one of the solutions to solve the conflicts of jurisdiction problems.

목차

Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 國際裁判機關의 發展과 管轄權規則
Ⅲ. 現行 國際司法裁判所(ICJ) 管轄權의 問題點
Ⅳ. 國際司法裁判所(ICJ) 管轄權의 發展方案
Ⅴ. 結論
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000704214