지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Deleuze stresses the conceptual autonomy of the State. Deleuze's notion of the State operates on many different conceptual levels. He argues that the State is an abstract form of power not wholly identifiable with its particular concrete realisations. Deleuze refers to a 'State-form' an abstract model of power: "the apparatus of the State is a concrete assemblage which realises the machine of overcoding of a society ... This ma-chine in its tum is thus not the State itself, it is the abstract machine which organises the dominant utterances and the established order of a society, the dominant languages and knowledge, conformist actions and feelings, the segments which prevail over others."
For Deleuze the State is an abstract machine rather than a concrete institution, which essentially "rules" through more minute institutions and practices of domination. The State overcodes and regulates these minor dominations, stamping them with its imprint. What is important about this abstract machine is not the form in which it appears, but rather its function, which is the constitution of a field of interiority in which political sovereignty can be exercised. The State may be seen as a process of capture.
Similarly to Stimer, Deleuze breaks with the Marxist analysis of the State. The function and origins of the State cannot be wholly explained by an economic analysis. The State is an apparatus which codes economic flows and flows of production, organizing them into a mode. This apparatus did not rise as a result of an agrarian mode of production as Marx argued, but in fact predates, and is presupposed by, this mode of production. For Deleuze the State cannot be attributed to the mode of production. Turning this traditional Marxist analysis on its head they suggest that the mode of production may in fact be derived from the State. As Deleuze says: "It is not the State that presupposes a mode of production; quite the opposite, it is the State that makes productions a 'mode'" For Deleuze there has always been a State - the Urstaat, an eternal State which comes into existence fully formed, at one stroke. This non-economic analysis of the State opens up a radical philosophical terrain in which power is theorised in its own right.
For Deleuze the State is an abstract machine rather than a concrete institution, which essentially "rules" through more minute institutions and practices of domination. The State overcodes and regulates these minor dominations, stamping them with its imprint. What is important about this abstract machine is not the form in which it appears, but rather its function, which is the constitution of a field of interiority in which political sovereignty can be exercised. The State may be seen as a process of capture.
Similarly to Stimer, Deleuze breaks with the Marxist analysis of the State. The function and origins of the State cannot be wholly explained by an economic analysis. The State is an apparatus which codes economic flows and flows of production, organizing them into a mode. This apparatus did not rise as a result of an agrarian mode of production as Marx argued, but in fact predates, and is presupposed by, this mode of production. For Deleuze the State cannot be attributed to the mode of production. Turning this traditional Marxist analysis on its head they suggest that the mode of production may in fact be derived from the State. As Deleuze says: "It is not the State that presupposes a mode of production; quite the opposite, it is the State that makes productions a 'mode'" For Deleuze there has always been a State - the Urstaat, an eternal State which comes into existence fully formed, at one stroke. This non-economic analysis of the State opens up a radical philosophical terrain in which power is theorised in its own right.
목차
1. 들어가는 글
2. 원국가와 압제적 포획
3. 마법적 포획과 거대기계
4. 나가는 글
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국문학과 들뢰즈
국어국문학
2011 .08
-
질 들뢰즈의 철학적 기획
프랑스문화연구
2006 .01
-
초기 들뢰즈 철학에 관한 연구
철학연구
2012 .09
-
들뢰즈 마르크스주의는 가능한가?
철학연구
2019 .08
-
들뢰즈의 권력과 정치
인문과학
2011 .12
-
화이트헤드와 들뢰즈: 대화가능성의 모색
화이트헤드연구
2010 .01
-
정동의 의미와 가능성
영어권문화연구
2019 .01
-
바로크시인 존 단과 G. W. 라이프니츠—모나드, 주름의 펼침
영어영문학21
2011 .01
-
들뢰즈 철학에 나타난 성(性)과 신체의 문제
철학탐구
2004 .10
-
들뢰즈와 화이트헤드의 시간론에 관한 연구
화이트헤드연구
2005 .01
-
기독교적 입장에서 본 Gilles Deleuze의 사상
복음과 실천
2006 .06
-
Deleuze, Levinas, Asian Thought, and A Gesture Life
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2010 .10
-
Heidegger, Benjamin, Deleuze의 차이관에 의한 후기산업사회 문화현상 해석(Ⅰ)
새한영어영문학
1997 .05
-
공명효과 : 들뢰즈의 문학론
철학사상
2008 .02
-
들뢰즈의 『감각의 논리 』에 관한 연구 : ‘형상’개념을 중심으로
철학연구
2017 .02
-
들뢰즈와 불교의 시간론
동서비교문학저널
2007 .06
-
‘리좀학(Rhizomatique)’의 가능성 - 들뢰즈 철학의 학문적 원리와 확장 -
시대와 철학
2019 .01
-
‘표현-기계’로서의 들뢰즈의 문학론 : ‘바틀비-기능’과 ‘K-기능’을 중심으로
새한영어영문학
2008 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-001-004299354