지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study has a purpose that I have critically investigated a literary theory of Deleuze an aspect how much useful ways there are to understand and interpret on Korean literature. For the efficient conduct of this purpose, above all, I had to guided literary theory from his philosophy and then, should have made a way clear and applied his literary theory in actual literary study. We simultaneously need to investigate an arrival level and an achieved result when we applied Deleuze’s thinking method in literary study.
An philosophical doing of Deleuze is creating work ‘New’ like an illegitimate child who was born by to practice sodomy between Deleuze and existing philosophers. It was an attempt to grasp chaos of living. He wanted to discover puissance of rhizomatic manifolds that has a virtual power in literature. Deleuze had constructed minority literary logic by to discover a concept of ‘people to come’ in literary text of F. Kafka, A. Artaud, D.H. Lawrence.
Deleuze’s philosophy was taken in 1990’s in Korea and Duleze’s ways applied to study in literature is from 2002 in the concrete. But these studies were staying level to introduce his theory or a ‘theoretical toolbox’ that was utilized partially. They were incapable of presenting a process of creation itself that was constructed a field in potential-nature and could not reached a productive level of discourse ‘New’ from sodomy between Deleuze and existing philosophers. Today and this spot are the ‘when and where’ we was met the needs of a ‘productive misunderstanding’ and ‘creative misreading’ about Deleuze and his works.
An philosophical doing of Deleuze is creating work ‘New’ like an illegitimate child who was born by to practice sodomy between Deleuze and existing philosophers. It was an attempt to grasp chaos of living. He wanted to discover puissance of rhizomatic manifolds that has a virtual power in literature. Deleuze had constructed minority literary logic by to discover a concept of ‘people to come’ in literary text of F. Kafka, A. Artaud, D.H. Lawrence.
Deleuze’s philosophy was taken in 1990’s in Korea and Duleze’s ways applied to study in literature is from 2002 in the concrete. But these studies were staying level to introduce his theory or a ‘theoretical toolbox’ that was utilized partially. They were incapable of presenting a process of creation itself that was constructed a field in potential-nature and could not reached a productive level of discourse ‘New’ from sodomy between Deleuze and existing philosophers. Today and this spot are the ‘when and where’ we was met the needs of a ‘productive misunderstanding’ and ‘creative misreading’ about Deleuze and his works.
목차
1. 들어가며 - 왜 들뢰즈인가?
2. 들뢰즈의 글쓰기
3. 들뢰즈의 문학이론
4. 한국문학 연구에 있어서 들뢰즈의 수용
5. 마무리
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-810-000685877