지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to show the ways in which the book of Jeremiah took up the concept of false prophet, enlarged its connotations, and adopted it as one of the more available and important means in order to preclude particular social and religious behaviors, from the perspective of redaction criticism.
In the book of Jeremiah, the false prophets are defined by 4 kind" of formulas which use the word ??? as follows: ??? ???? (to prophesy in falsehood), ????? ???? ???? ??? (the prophet who prophesies in My name falsehood), ??? ??? ? (to prophesy falsehood to), ??? ??? (to make falsehood). The first formula is used to define the false prophets whose prophecies are suggested to be what the people wanted to hear(Jer. 5:30-31}. In this case the so-called false prophets are seen as a part of leaders in Judah. The texts using the second formula(Jer 14:13-16; 23:25-27, 32; 29:8-9}, without presenting the contents of false prophecy, criticize mainly the wrong means such as 'vision(????) and divination(???), idolatries(????), and the deceit of their heart(???? ??), which the false prophet would use to get oracles.
While these first two formulas try to define some attitudes and means of oracle as false prophets' without presenting the detailed contents of prophecy, the texts with the third formula(Jer. 27:9-10, 14-16; 29:21, 31) clearly show the contents of the so-called false prophecy, which is falsified according to its contents. The falsified prophecies all strongly opposed that Babylonia would destroy Judah and Jerusalem and that the victory of Babylon was the will of the Lord. The accusation against these falsified prophecies in Jeremiah can be understood properly in terms of the social context of the Babylon exile community.
In the texts with fourth formula(Jer, 6:13-14; 8:10-11), the prophets, who prophesied in order to earn economic profit with their prophecies, are falsified. And these texts use the wrong means of prophecy to falsify certain oracles and combine the criticism against the false prophetic mediums with the criticism against certain prophecies.
On the base of this observation, it is immediately suggested that the concept of falsehood had a special significance in the book of Jeremiah. In conclusion, using directly the various formulas of falsification, the redactors produced an edition of Jeremiah to serve their own purpose in the exilic political struggles for power in the community.
In the book of Jeremiah, the false prophets are defined by 4 kind" of formulas which use the word ??? as follows: ??? ???? (to prophesy in falsehood), ????? ???? ???? ??? (the prophet who prophesies in My name falsehood), ??? ??? ? (to prophesy falsehood to), ??? ??? (to make falsehood). The first formula is used to define the false prophets whose prophecies are suggested to be what the people wanted to hear(Jer. 5:30-31}. In this case the so-called false prophets are seen as a part of leaders in Judah. The texts using the second formula(Jer 14:13-16; 23:25-27, 32; 29:8-9}, without presenting the contents of false prophecy, criticize mainly the wrong means such as 'vision(????) and divination(???), idolatries(????), and the deceit of their heart(???? ??), which the false prophet would use to get oracles.
While these first two formulas try to define some attitudes and means of oracle as false prophets' without presenting the detailed contents of prophecy, the texts with the third formula(Jer. 27:9-10, 14-16; 29:21, 31) clearly show the contents of the so-called false prophecy, which is falsified according to its contents. The falsified prophecies all strongly opposed that Babylonia would destroy Judah and Jerusalem and that the victory of Babylon was the will of the Lord. The accusation against these falsified prophecies in Jeremiah can be understood properly in terms of the social context of the Babylon exile community.
In the texts with fourth formula(Jer, 6:13-14; 8:10-11), the prophets, who prophesied in order to earn economic profit with their prophecies, are falsified. And these texts use the wrong means of prophecy to falsify certain oracles and combine the criticism against the false prophetic mediums with the criticism against certain prophecies.
On the base of this observation, it is immediately suggested that the concept of falsehood had a special significance in the book of Jeremiah. In conclusion, using directly the various formulas of falsification, the redactors produced an edition of Jeremiah to serve their own purpose in the exilic political struggles for power in the community.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 직접적 거짓 예언 규정 유형들
Ⅲ. 거짓 예언자 규정의 시대적 변화
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김영진 / 2006 / 포로기와 포로기 이후의 신학사상 / 구약논단 21 : 33 ~ 50
2. [단행본] - 브라이트,죤 / 1985 / 예레미야 / 한국신학연구소
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 차준희 / 1995 / 예레미야의 성전 설교와 미가 전승 / 구약논단 1 : 205 ~ 232
4. [단행본] - Brueggemann, W. / 1988 / To Pluck Up, To Tear Down: A Commentary on the Book of Jeremiah 1-25 / Grand Rapid
5. [단행본] - Butler, S. A. L. / 1998 / Mesopotamian Conceptions of Dreams and Dream Rituals / Ugarit-Verlag
2. [단행본] - 브라이트,죤 / 1985 / 예레미야 / 한국신학연구소
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 차준희 / 1995 / 예레미야의 성전 설교와 미가 전승 / 구약논단 1 : 205 ~ 232
4. [단행본] - Brueggemann, W. / 1988 / To Pluck Up, To Tear Down: A Commentary on the Book of Jeremiah 1-25 / Grand Rapid
5. [단행본] - Butler, S. A. L. / 1998 / Mesopotamian Conceptions of Dreams and Dream Rituals / Ugarit-Verlag
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
에스겔서에 사용된 ‘허탄한 묵시’(하존 샤브)의 의미와 기능 연구 : 에스겔서 13장을 중심으로
구약논단
2014 .09
-
거짓과의 끝없는 논쟁들— 구약성서 예언서를 중심으로
신학과 선교
2018 .01
-
예레미야의 소명과 사명의 관계성
신학과 목회
2011 .05
-
The Falsehood of the Priests in Jeremiah
신학논단
2009 .12
-
예언과 사회체제
신학연구
1989 .11
-
성취되지 않은 예언의 문제 : 고대 이스라엘 예언을 중심으로
장신논단
2014 .03
-
이스라엘 예언과 예언서 연구
신학과세계
1986 .05
-
예언과 신유은사에 대한 신학적 이해
한국조직신학논총
2009 .01
-
신앗시리아의 왕을 향한 예언 연구
Canon&Culture
2011 .10
-
False Contrast
Korea Journal
1983 .06
-
구약성서의 문서적 기원
구약논단
2017 .06
-
고린도 공동체의 방언과 예언 : 고전 14:22-25을 중심으로
신학논단
2012 .12
-
예레미야서에 나타난 『거짓말』의 문제: 『쉐케르(ŝeqer)』의 사회사적 문맥을 중심하여
신학과세계
2019 .12
-
조선후기 천주교와 《鄭鍵錄》 : 소문화집단의 상호작용
교회사연구
2008 .06
-
예레미야와 바스훌의 갈등의 역사적 배경 연구
신학과 목회
2016 .05
-
소셜 미디어로서의 예언의 역할 : 마리문서의 예언현상을 중심으로
장신논단
2011 .07
-
예레미야 소명 설화의 의도
신학과 목회
2015 .11
-
신약성경에 나타난 예언의 영성: 바울을 중심으로
피어선 신학 논단
2014 .02
-
Prophetic Ways of Transmitting the Word of God
Catholic Theology and Thought
2015 .12
-
고대근동과 이스라엘의 예언에 나타난 왕과 예언자의 관계연구 : 신앗시리아의 예언과 나단의 예언(삼하 7:4-17)을 중심으로
장신논단
2012 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-230-004257124